A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccines against Omicron variants

被引:6
作者
Song, Shangchen [1 ]
Madewell, Zachary J. [1 ]
Liu, Mingjin [2 ]
Miao, Yu [2 ]
Xiang, Shaolin [2 ]
Huo, Yanan [3 ]
Sarkar, Shoumi [1 ]
Chowdhury, Amily [4 ]
Longini Jr, Ira M. [1 ]
Yang, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Stat, Athens, GA USA
[3] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Athens, GA USA
关键词
Bivalent; Omicron; Vaccine Effectiveness; Meta-Analysis; Infection; Severe disease;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.049
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: A global shift to bivalent mRNA vaccines is ongoing to counterbalance the diminishing effectiveness of the original monovalent vaccines due to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants, yet substantial variation in the bivalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) exists across studies and a complete picture is lacking. Methods: We searched papers evaluating absolute or relative effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 type or BA.4/5 type bivalent mRNA vaccines on eight publication databases published from September 1st, 2022, to November 8th, 2023. Pooled VE against Omicron-associated infection and severe events (hospitalization and/or death) was estimated in reference to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses. Results: From 630 citations identified, 28 studies were included, involving 55,393,303 individuals. Bivalent boosters demonstrated higher effectiveness against symptomatic or any infection for all ages combined, with an absolute VE of 53.5 % (95 % CI: -22.2-82.3 %) when compared to unvaccinated and relative VE of 30.8 % (95 % CI: 22.5-38.2 %) and 28.4 % (95 % CI: 10.2-42.9 %) when compared to >= 2 and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. The corresponding VE estimates for adults >= 60 years old were 22.5 % (95 % CI: 16.8-39.8 %), 31.4 % (95 % CI: 27.7-35.0 %), and 30.6 % (95 % CI: - 13.2-57.5 %). Pooled bivalent VE estimates against severe events were higher, 72.9 % (95 % CI: 60.5-82.4 %), 57.6 % (95 % CI: 42.4-68.8 %), and 62.1 % (95 % CI: 54.6-68.3 %) for all ages, and 72.0 % (95 % CI: 51.4-83.9 %), 63.4 % (95 % CI: 41.0-77.3 %), and 60.7 % (95 % CI: 52.4-67.6 %) for adults >= 60 years old, compared to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. Conclusions: The bivalent boosters demonstrated superior protection against severe outcomes than the original monovalent boosters across age groups, highlighting the critical need for improving vaccine coverage, especially among the vulnerable older subpopulation.
引用
收藏
页码:3389 / 3396
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against Delta (B.1.617.2) Variant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
    Pormohammad, Ali
    Zarei, Mohammad
    Ghorbani, Saied
    Mohammadi, Mehdi
    Neshin, Saeideh Aghayari Sheikh
    Khatami, Alireza
    Turner, Diana L.
    Djalalinia, Shirin
    Mousavi, Seied Asadollah
    Mardani-Fard, Heydar Ali
    Kasaeian, Amir
    Turner, Raymond J.
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [42] Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Xiaokun
    Zhao, Hongting
    Li, Zhili
    Zhu, Aiqin
    Ren, Minrui
    Geng, Mengjie
    Li, Yu
    Qin, Ying
    Feng, Luzhao
    Peng, Zhibin
    An, Zhijie
    Zheng, Jiandong
    Li, Zhongjie
    Feng, Zijian
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (02) : 1 - 13
  • [43] Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccination and previous infection in older adults during Omicron period: real-world evidence
    Espana, Pedro-Pablo
    Castillo-Sintes, Idoia
    Legarreta, Maria J.
    Bilbao-Gonzalez, Amaia
    Larrea, Nere
    Gascon, Maria
    Uranga, Ane
    Artaraz, Amaia
    Garcia-Asensio, Julia
    Quintana, Jose M.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2024, 53 (11)
  • [44] Effectiveness of grade retention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Goos, Mieke
    Pipa, Joana
    Peixoto, Francisco
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2021, 34
  • [45] The Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Hong
    Jin, Rongjiang
    Li, Mengxiao
    Liu, Zhihong
    Xie, Qing
    Wang, Pu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (03): : 489 - 513
  • [46] The Vaccine Efficacy Against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zou, Yuntao
    Huang, Doudou
    Jiang, Qian
    Guo, Yanglin
    Chen, Chider
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [47] Immunogenicity, duration of protection, effectiveness and safety of rubella containing vaccines: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    van den Boogaard, Jossy
    de Gier, Brechje
    Lima, Priscila de Oliveira Bressane
    Desai, Shalini
    de Melker, Hester E.
    Hahne, Susan J. M.
    Veldhuijzen, Irene K.
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (06) : 889 - 900
  • [48] The Effect of Malaria on Responses to Unrelated Vaccines in Animals and Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zirimenya, Ludoviko
    Natukunda, Agnes
    Nassuuna, Jacent
    Kabagenyi, Joyce
    Nkurunungi, Gyaviira
    Elliott, Alison M.
    Webb, Emily L.
    PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 46 (10)
  • [49] Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in real-world: a literature review and meta-analysis
    Shao, Weihao
    Chen, Xiaorui
    Zheng, Caifang
    Liu, Haoshuang
    Wang, Gaili
    Zhang, Bowen
    Li, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Weidong
    EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS, 2022, 11 (01) : 2383 - 2392
  • [50] Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines against COVID-19 Infection: A Meta-Analysis of Test-Negative Design Studies
    Chang, Shuailei
    Liu, Hongbo
    Wu, Jian
    Xiao, Wenwei
    Chen, Sijia
    Qiu, Shaofu
    Duan, Guangcai
    Song, Hongbin
    Zhang, Rongguang
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (03)