A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccines against Omicron variants

被引:6
作者
Song, Shangchen [1 ]
Madewell, Zachary J. [1 ]
Liu, Mingjin [2 ]
Miao, Yu [2 ]
Xiang, Shaolin [2 ]
Huo, Yanan [3 ]
Sarkar, Shoumi [1 ]
Chowdhury, Amily [4 ]
Longini Jr, Ira M. [1 ]
Yang, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Stat, Athens, GA USA
[3] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Athens, GA USA
关键词
Bivalent; Omicron; Vaccine Effectiveness; Meta-Analysis; Infection; Severe disease;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.049
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: A global shift to bivalent mRNA vaccines is ongoing to counterbalance the diminishing effectiveness of the original monovalent vaccines due to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants, yet substantial variation in the bivalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) exists across studies and a complete picture is lacking. Methods: We searched papers evaluating absolute or relative effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 type or BA.4/5 type bivalent mRNA vaccines on eight publication databases published from September 1st, 2022, to November 8th, 2023. Pooled VE against Omicron-associated infection and severe events (hospitalization and/or death) was estimated in reference to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses. Results: From 630 citations identified, 28 studies were included, involving 55,393,303 individuals. Bivalent boosters demonstrated higher effectiveness against symptomatic or any infection for all ages combined, with an absolute VE of 53.5 % (95 % CI: -22.2-82.3 %) when compared to unvaccinated and relative VE of 30.8 % (95 % CI: 22.5-38.2 %) and 28.4 % (95 % CI: 10.2-42.9 %) when compared to >= 2 and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. The corresponding VE estimates for adults >= 60 years old were 22.5 % (95 % CI: 16.8-39.8 %), 31.4 % (95 % CI: 27.7-35.0 %), and 30.6 % (95 % CI: - 13.2-57.5 %). Pooled bivalent VE estimates against severe events were higher, 72.9 % (95 % CI: 60.5-82.4 %), 57.6 % (95 % CI: 42.4-68.8 %), and 62.1 % (95 % CI: 54.6-68.3 %) for all ages, and 72.0 % (95 % CI: 51.4-83.9 %), 63.4 % (95 % CI: 41.0-77.3 %), and 60.7 % (95 % CI: 52.4-67.6 %) for adults >= 60 years old, compared to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. Conclusions: The bivalent boosters demonstrated superior protection against severe outcomes than the original monovalent boosters across age groups, highlighting the critical need for improving vaccine coverage, especially among the vulnerable older subpopulation.
引用
收藏
页码:3389 / 3396
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Real-World Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against Infection, Symptomatic and Severe COVID-19 Disease Caused by the Omicron Variant (B.1.1.529)
    Mohammed, Hassen
    Pham-Tran, Dan Duy
    Yeoh, Zi Yi Michelle
    Wang, Bing
    McMillan, Mark
    Andraweera, Prabha H.
    Marshall, Helen S.
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [32] The Effectiveness of Therapeutic Vaccines for the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ventura, Cathy
    Luis, Angelo
    Soares, Christiane P.
    Venuti, Aldo
    Paolini, Francesca
    Pereira, Luisa
    Sousa, Angela
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [33] How well do different COVID-19 vaccines protect against different viral variants? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hoang, Thi Ngoc Anh
    Byrne, Aisling
    Quach, Ha-Linh
    Bannister-Tyrrell, Melanie
    Vogt, Florian
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2024, 119 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [34] Seropositivity to non-vaccine incorporated genotypes induced by the bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bissett, Sara L.
    Godi, Anna
    Jit, Mark
    Beddows, Simon
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (32) : 3922 - 3929
  • [35] Influenza vaccine effectiveness against influenza-associated hospitalization in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kalligeros, Markos
    Shehadeh, Fadi
    Mylona, Evangelia K.
    Dapaah-Afriyie, Christine
    van Aalst, Robertus
    Chit, Ayman
    Mylonakis, Eleftherios
    VACCINE, 2020, 38 (14) : 2893 - 2903
  • [36] mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Molica, Stefano
    Giannarelli, Diana
    Montserrat, Emili
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2022, 108 (03) : 264 - 267
  • [37] Immunogenicity and Safety of Chikungunya Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rosso, Annalisa
    Flacco, Maria Elena
    Cioni, Giovanni
    Tiseo, Marco
    Imperiali, Gianmarco
    Bianconi, Alessandro
    Fiore, Matteo
    Calo, Giovanna Letizia
    Orazi, Vittorio
    Troia, Anastasia
    Manzoli, Lamberto
    VACCINES, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [38] Real-World Safety of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Wanqian
    Ren, Weigang
    Wu, Tongxin
    Wang, Qin
    Luo, Mi
    Yi, Yongxiang
    Li, Junwei
    VACCINES, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [39] Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Monovalent and Bivalent Vaccine Booster Doses Against Omicron Severe Outcomes Among Adults Aged ≥50 Years in Ontario, Canada: A Canadian Immunization Research Network Study
    Grewal, Ramandip
    Buchan, Sarah A.
    Nguyen, Lena
    Nasreen, Sharifa
    Austin, Peter C.
    Brown, Kevin A.
    Gubbay, Jonathan
    Lee, Nelson
    Schwartz, Kevin L.
    Tadrous, Mina
    Wilson, Kumanan
    Wilson, Sarah E.
    Kwong, Jeffrey C.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 229 (02) : 394 - 397
  • [40] Effectiveness of interventions to improve vaccine efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aviraj K. S
    Apoorva Wasnik
    Lalima Gupta
    Ayushi Ranjan
    Harshini Suresh
    Systematic Reviews, 14 (1)