A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccines against Omicron variants

被引:6
作者
Song, Shangchen [1 ]
Madewell, Zachary J. [1 ]
Liu, Mingjin [2 ]
Miao, Yu [2 ]
Xiang, Shaolin [2 ]
Huo, Yanan [3 ]
Sarkar, Shoumi [1 ]
Chowdhury, Amily [4 ]
Longini Jr, Ira M. [1 ]
Yang, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Stat, Athens, GA USA
[3] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Athens, GA USA
关键词
Bivalent; Omicron; Vaccine Effectiveness; Meta-Analysis; Infection; Severe disease;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.049
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: A global shift to bivalent mRNA vaccines is ongoing to counterbalance the diminishing effectiveness of the original monovalent vaccines due to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants, yet substantial variation in the bivalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) exists across studies and a complete picture is lacking. Methods: We searched papers evaluating absolute or relative effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 type or BA.4/5 type bivalent mRNA vaccines on eight publication databases published from September 1st, 2022, to November 8th, 2023. Pooled VE against Omicron-associated infection and severe events (hospitalization and/or death) was estimated in reference to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses. Results: From 630 citations identified, 28 studies were included, involving 55,393,303 individuals. Bivalent boosters demonstrated higher effectiveness against symptomatic or any infection for all ages combined, with an absolute VE of 53.5 % (95 % CI: -22.2-82.3 %) when compared to unvaccinated and relative VE of 30.8 % (95 % CI: 22.5-38.2 %) and 28.4 % (95 % CI: 10.2-42.9 %) when compared to >= 2 and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. The corresponding VE estimates for adults >= 60 years old were 22.5 % (95 % CI: 16.8-39.8 %), 31.4 % (95 % CI: 27.7-35.0 %), and 30.6 % (95 % CI: - 13.2-57.5 %). Pooled bivalent VE estimates against severe events were higher, 72.9 % (95 % CI: 60.5-82.4 %), 57.6 % (95 % CI: 42.4-68.8 %), and 62.1 % (95 % CI: 54.6-68.3 %) for all ages, and 72.0 % (95 % CI: 51.4-83.9 %), 63.4 % (95 % CI: 41.0-77.3 %), and 60.7 % (95 % CI: 52.4-67.6 %) for adults >= 60 years old, compared to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. Conclusions: The bivalent boosters demonstrated superior protection against severe outcomes than the original monovalent boosters across age groups, highlighting the critical need for improving vaccine coverage, especially among the vulnerable older subpopulation.
引用
收藏
页码:3389 / 3396
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Population effectiveness of the pentavalent and monovalent rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Daniel Hungerford
    Katie Smith
    Angela Tucker
    Miren Iturriza-Gómara
    Roberto Vivancos
    Catherine McLeonard
    Nigel A Cunliffe
    Neil French
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 17
  • [22] COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness of Booster Doses Against Delta and Omicron Variants Over Follow-up Times Using Longitudinal Meta-analysis
    Mostafavi, Farideh
    Bahardoust, Mansour
    Sera, Francesco
    Amirabadizadeh, Alireza
    Allahyari, Sepehr
    Ssentongod, Paddy
    Karami, Manochehr
    Nazari, Seyed Saeed Hashemi
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 24 (04)
  • [23] Efficacy and Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ghazy, Ramy Mohamed
    Ashmawy, Rasha
    Hamdy, Noha Alaa
    Elhadi, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed
    Reyad, Omar Ahmed
    Elmalawany, Dina
    Almaghraby, Abdallah
    Shaaban, Ramy
    Taha, Sarah Hamed N.
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [24] Safety and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ling, Yunzhi
    Zhong, Jiaying
    Luo, Jiaru
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (12) : 6486 - 6495
  • [25] The Effectiveness of Coxiella burnetii Vaccines in Occupationally Exposed Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    O'Neill, T. J.
    Sargeant, J. M.
    Poljak, Z.
    ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 61 (02) : 81 - 96
  • [26] Immunogenicity, clinical efficacy and safety of additional second COVID-19 booster vaccines against Omicron and its subvariants: A systematic review
    Chenchula, Santenna
    Chandra, Madhu Bhargavi
    Adusumilli, Madhu Babu
    Ghanta, Sai Nikhila
    Bommasani, Anusha
    Kuttiappan, Anitha
    Padmavathi, R.
    Amerneni, Krishna Chaitanya
    Chikatipalli, Radhika
    Ghanta, Mohan Krishna
    Reddy, Samarra Simha
    Bai, K. Mythili
    Prakash, Satya
    Jogender, G.
    Chavan, Madhavrao
    Balakrishnan, S.
    REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 34 (01)
  • [27] Immunogenicity and effectiveness of COVID-19 booster vaccination among people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Meng-Qun
    Li, Rong
    Weng, Zhi-Ying
    Song, Gao
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [28] Efficacy of commercially available vaccines against canine leptospirosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Esteves, Stephanie Bergmann
    Santos, Cassia Moreira
    Salgado, Fabiana Ferreira
    Goncales, Amane Paldes
    Alves Guilloux, Aline Gil
    Martins, Camila Marinelli
    Hagiwara, Mitika Kuribaiashi
    Miotto, Bruno Alonso
    VACCINE, 2022, 40 (12) : 1722 - 1740
  • [29] Effectiveness of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lansbury, Louise E.
    Smith, Sherie
    Beyer, Walter
    Karamehic, Emina
    Pasic-Juhas, Eva
    Sikira, Hana
    Mateus, Ana
    Oshitani, Hitoshi
    Zhao, Hongxin
    Beck, Charles R.
    Nguyen-Van-Tam, Jonathan S.
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (16) : 1996 - 2006
  • [30] Effectiveness of the pre-Omicron COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron in reducing infection, hospitalization, severity, and mortality compared to Delta and other variants: A systematic review
    Paul, Pradipta
    El-Naas, Ahmed
    Hamad, Omar
    Salameh, Mohammad A.
    Mhaimeed, Nada
    Laswi, Ibrahim
    Abdelati, Ali A.
    AlAnni, Jamal
    Khanjar, Bushra
    Al-Ali, Dana
    Pillai, Krishnadev V.
    Elshafeey, Abdallah
    Alroobi, Hasan
    Burney, Zain
    Mhaimeed, Omar
    Bhatti, Mohammad
    Sinha, Pratyaksha
    Almasri, Muna
    Aly, Ahmed
    Bshesh, Khalifa
    Chamseddine, Reem
    Khalil, Omar
    D'Souza, Ashton
    Shree, Thanu
    Mhaimeed, Narjis
    Yagan, Lina
    Zakaria, Dalia
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (01)