A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccines against Omicron variants

被引:6
作者
Song, Shangchen [1 ]
Madewell, Zachary J. [1 ]
Liu, Mingjin [2 ]
Miao, Yu [2 ]
Xiang, Shaolin [2 ]
Huo, Yanan [3 ]
Sarkar, Shoumi [1 ]
Chowdhury, Amily [4 ]
Longini Jr, Ira M. [1 ]
Yang, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Stat, Athens, GA USA
[3] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Athens, GA USA
关键词
Bivalent; Omicron; Vaccine Effectiveness; Meta-Analysis; Infection; Severe disease;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.049
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: A global shift to bivalent mRNA vaccines is ongoing to counterbalance the diminishing effectiveness of the original monovalent vaccines due to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants, yet substantial variation in the bivalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) exists across studies and a complete picture is lacking. Methods: We searched papers evaluating absolute or relative effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 type or BA.4/5 type bivalent mRNA vaccines on eight publication databases published from September 1st, 2022, to November 8th, 2023. Pooled VE against Omicron-associated infection and severe events (hospitalization and/or death) was estimated in reference to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses. Results: From 630 citations identified, 28 studies were included, involving 55,393,303 individuals. Bivalent boosters demonstrated higher effectiveness against symptomatic or any infection for all ages combined, with an absolute VE of 53.5 % (95 % CI: -22.2-82.3 %) when compared to unvaccinated and relative VE of 30.8 % (95 % CI: 22.5-38.2 %) and 28.4 % (95 % CI: 10.2-42.9 %) when compared to >= 2 and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. The corresponding VE estimates for adults >= 60 years old were 22.5 % (95 % CI: 16.8-39.8 %), 31.4 % (95 % CI: 27.7-35.0 %), and 30.6 % (95 % CI: - 13.2-57.5 %). Pooled bivalent VE estimates against severe events were higher, 72.9 % (95 % CI: 60.5-82.4 %), 57.6 % (95 % CI: 42.4-68.8 %), and 62.1 % (95 % CI: 54.6-68.3 %) for all ages, and 72.0 % (95 % CI: 51.4-83.9 %), 63.4 % (95 % CI: 41.0-77.3 %), and 60.7 % (95 % CI: 52.4-67.6 %) for adults >= 60 years old, compared to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. Conclusions: The bivalent boosters demonstrated superior protection against severe outcomes than the original monovalent boosters across age groups, highlighting the critical need for improving vaccine coverage, especially among the vulnerable older subpopulation.
引用
收藏
页码:3389 / 3396
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Omicron Containing Booster Vaccines Among Patients With Hematological Neoplasms
    Tadmor, Tamar
    Melamed, Guy
    Alapi, Hilel
    Patalon, Tal
    Rokach, Lior
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (07) : 3129 - 3134
  • [2] Effectiveness of mRNA vaccine against Omicron-related infections in the real world: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Kaixin
    Ni, Peng
    Chang, Shuailei
    Jin, Yuefei
    Duan, Guangcai
    Zhang, Rongguang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2023, 51 (09) : 1049 - 1055
  • [3] Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against Omicron infection and severe events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies
    Song, Shangchen
    Madewell, Zachary J.
    Liu, Mingjin
    Longini, Ira M.
    Yang, Yang
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [4] Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zeng, Baoqi
    Gao, Le
    Zhou, Qingxin
    Yu, Kai
    Sun, Feng
    BMC MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [5] Protection of the third-dose and fourth-dose mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rahman, Md. Obaidur
    Kamigaki, Taro
    Thandar, Moe Moe
    Haruyama, Rei
    Yan, Fangyu
    Shibamura-Fujiogi, Miho
    Soe, July Khin Maung
    Islam, Md. Rafiqul
    Yoneoka, Daisuke
    Miyahara, Reiko
    Ota, Erika
    Suzuki, Motoi
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [6] Effectiveness of mRNA and viral-vector vaccines in epidemic period led by different SARS-CoV-2 variants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jun
    Yang, Wenxing
    Huang, Feijun
    Zhang, Kui
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2023, 95 (03)
  • [7] Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baoqi Zeng
    Le Gao
    Qingxin Zhou
    Kai Yu
    Feng Sun
    BMC Medicine, 20
  • [8] Vaccine effectiveness of 3rd generation mpox vaccines against mpox and disease severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pischel, Lauren
    Martini, Brett A.
    Yu, Natalle
    Cacesse, David
    Tracy, Mahder
    Kharbanda, Kolambi
    Ahmed, Noureen
    Patel, Kavin M.
    Grimshaw, Alyssa A.
    Malik, Amyn A.
    Goshua, George
    Omer, Saad B.
    VACCINE, 2024, 42 (25)
  • [9] Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccines in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vasileiou, Eleftheria
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Butler, Chris
    El Ferkh, Karim
    von Wissmann, Beatrix
    McMenamin, Jim
    Ritchie, Lewis
    Schwarze, Jurgen
    Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
    Johnstone, Sebastian L.
    Tian, Lilly
    Simpson, Cohn R.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (08) : 1388 - 1395
  • [10] Vaccine effectiveness and impact of meningococcal vaccines against gonococcal infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Bing
    Mohammed, Hassen
    Andraweera, Prabha
    McMillan, Mark
    Marshall, Helen
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2024, 89 (03)