共 50 条
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bivalent mRNA booster vaccines against Omicron variants
被引:6
作者:
Song, Shangchen
[1
]
Madewell, Zachary J.
[1
]
Liu, Mingjin
[2
]
Miao, Yu
[2
]
Xiang, Shaolin
[2
]
Huo, Yanan
[3
]
Sarkar, Shoumi
[1
]
Chowdhury, Amily
[4
]
Longini Jr, Ira M.
[1
]
Yang, Yang
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Stat, Athens, GA USA
[3] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Franklin Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Athens, GA USA
来源:
关键词:
Bivalent;
Omicron;
Vaccine Effectiveness;
Meta-Analysis;
Infection;
Severe disease;
D O I:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.049
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: A global shift to bivalent mRNA vaccines is ongoing to counterbalance the diminishing effectiveness of the original monovalent vaccines due to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants, yet substantial variation in the bivalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) exists across studies and a complete picture is lacking. Methods: We searched papers evaluating absolute or relative effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 type or BA.4/5 type bivalent mRNA vaccines on eight publication databases published from September 1st, 2022, to November 8th, 2023. Pooled VE against Omicron-associated infection and severe events (hospitalization and/or death) was estimated in reference to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses. Results: From 630 citations identified, 28 studies were included, involving 55,393,303 individuals. Bivalent boosters demonstrated higher effectiveness against symptomatic or any infection for all ages combined, with an absolute VE of 53.5 % (95 % CI: -22.2-82.3 %) when compared to unvaccinated and relative VE of 30.8 % (95 % CI: 22.5-38.2 %) and 28.4 % (95 % CI: 10.2-42.9 %) when compared to >= 2 and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. The corresponding VE estimates for adults >= 60 years old were 22.5 % (95 % CI: 16.8-39.8 %), 31.4 % (95 % CI: 27.7-35.0 %), and 30.6 % (95 % CI: - 13.2-57.5 %). Pooled bivalent VE estimates against severe events were higher, 72.9 % (95 % CI: 60.5-82.4 %), 57.6 % (95 % CI: 42.4-68.8 %), and 62.1 % (95 % CI: 54.6-68.3 %) for all ages, and 72.0 % (95 % CI: 51.4-83.9 %), 63.4 % (95 % CI: 41.0-77.3 %), and 60.7 % (95 % CI: 52.4-67.6 %) for adults >= 60 years old, compared to unvaccinated, >= 2 original monovalent doses, and >= 3 original monovalent doses, respectively. Conclusions: The bivalent boosters demonstrated superior protection against severe outcomes than the original monovalent boosters across age groups, highlighting the critical need for improving vaccine coverage, especially among the vulnerable older subpopulation.
引用
收藏
页码:3389 / 3396
页数:8
相关论文