Endodontic Treatment Outcomes in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images-Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of AI

被引:2
作者
Kazimierczak, Wojciech [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kazimierczak, Natalia [1 ]
Issa, Julien [4 ]
Wajer, Roza [2 ]
Wajer, Adrian [5 ]
Kalka, Sandra [1 ]
Serafin, Zbigniew [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kazimierczak Private Med Practice, Dworcowa 13-u6a, PL-85009 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[2] Univ Hosp No 1 Bydgoszcz, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Marii Sklodowskiej Curie 9, PL-85094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[3] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Coll Medicum, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Jagiellonska 13-15, PL-85067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[4] Poznan Univ Med Sci, Chair Pract Clin Dent, Dept Diagnost, PL-61701 Poznan, Poland
[5] Dent Primus, Poznanska 18, PL-88100 Inowroclaw, Poland
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); automatic detection; diagnosis; diagnostic test accuracy; CBCT; cone beam computed tomography; endodontic treatment; MANAGEMENT; CBCT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13144116
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the AI-driven platform Diagnocat for evaluating endodontic treatment outcomes using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: A total of 55 consecutive patients (15 males and 40 females, aged 12-70 years) referred for CBCT imaging were included. CBCT images were analyzed using Diagnocat's AI platform, which assessed parameters such as the probability of filling, adequate obturation, adequate density, overfilling, voids in filling, short filling, and root canal number. The images were also evaluated by two experienced human readers. Diagnostic accuracy metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score) were assessed and compared to the readers' consensus, which served as the reference standard. Results: The AI platform demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for most parameters, with perfect scores for the probability of filling (accuracy, precision, recall, F1 = 100%). Adequate obturation showed moderate performance (accuracy = 84.1%, precision = 66.7%, recall = 92.3%, and F1 = 77.4%). Adequate density (accuracy = 95.5%, precision, recall, and F1 = 97.2%), overfilling (accuracy = 95.5%, precision = 86.7%, recall = 100%, and F1 = 92.9%), and short fillings (accuracy = 95.5%, precision = 100%, recall = 86.7%, and F1 = 92.9%) also exhibited strong performance. The performance of AI for voids in filling detection (accuracy = 88.6%, precision = 88.9%, recall = 66.7%, and F1 = 76.2%) highlighted areas for improvement. Conclusions: The AI platform Diagnocat showed high diagnostic accuracy in evaluating endodontic treatment outcomes using CBCT images, indicating its potential as a valuable tool in dental radiology.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Is the quality of root canal filling obtained by cone-beam computed tomography associated with periapical lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alves dos Santos, Guilherme Nilson
    Faria-e-Silva, Andre Luis
    Ribeiro, Vitor Luis
    Pelozo, Lais Lima
    Candemil, Amanda Pelegrin
    Oliveira, Matheus L.
    Lopes-Olhe, Fabiane Carneiro
    Mazzi-Chaves, Jardel Francisco
    Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (08) : 5105 - 5116
  • [2] Artificial Intelligence in Endodontics: Current Applications and Future Directions
    Aminoshariae, Anita
    Kulild, Jim
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2021, 47 (09) : 1352 - 1357
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, LANCET, V402, P503, DOI [10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01668-9, 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01668-9]
  • [4] Berkhout W E R, 2015, Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd, V122, P263, DOI 10.5177/ntvt.2015.5.14227
  • [5] Ezhov M, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-94093-9
  • [6] Impact of Three Radiographic Methods in the Outcome of Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment: A Five-Year Follow-up
    Fernandez, Rafael
    Cadavid, Diego
    Zapata, Sandra M.
    Alvarez, Luis G.
    Restrepo, Felipe A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2013, 39 (09) : 1097 - 1103
  • [7] Comparison of Classic Endodontic Techniques versus Contemporary Techniques on Endodontic Treatment Success
    Fleming, Chris H.
    Litaken, Mark S.
    Alley, Larry W.
    Eleazer, Paul D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (03) : 414 - 418
  • [8] Justification and optimization of CT in children: how are we performing?
    Frush D.P.
    [J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2011, 41 (Suppl 2) : 467 - 471
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial radiology: what is currently possible?
    Heo, Min-Suk
    Kim, Jo-Eun
    Hwang, Jae-Joon
    Han, Sang-Sun
    Kim, Jin-Soo
    Yi, Won-Jin
    Park, In-Woo
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (03)
  • [10] On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence
    Hicks, Steven A.
    Struemke, Inga
    Thambawita, Vajira
    Hammou, Malek
    Riegler, Michael A.
    Halvorsen, Pal
    Parasa, Sravanthi
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)