Structural safety, technical reliability, and optimal redundancy allocation in structural systems

被引:2
作者
Beck, Andre T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Struct Engn, Sao Carlos, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Latent failure probability; social; political and management factors; systematic errors; human error; risk-based optimisation; risk-based decision making; RISK OPTIMIZATION; HUMAN ERROR; DESIGN; ROBUSTNESS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1080/10286608.2024.2402810
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Structural Reliability theory provides the means for managing uncertainties in modern codified structural design. Yet, historical records show that most structural collapses occur due to uncertainties not explicitly considered in reliability calculations, such as gross errors in design and execution, unanticipated loading, poor understanding of phenomena, new technology, etc. Recently, it has been shown that neglecting the above 'non-technical' factors in reliability-based optimisation leads to non-redundant optimal designs, with negative impacts on structural robustness. Surprisingly, the observed collapse frequency of structures was recently found to be smaller than calculated failure probabilities. This reveals that structural reliability calculations are conservative with respect to technical factors, while grossly overlooking non-technical factors. Population wise, the two independent errors may be partially offsetting each other. The discussion herein covers significant 'open issues' to be addressed by the Structural Safety community, before risk-based performance metrics can be incorporated into structural design practice.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]   Development of methods of structural reliability [J].
Ellingwood, Bruce ;
Maes, Marc ;
Bartlett, F. Michael ;
Beck, Andre T. ;
Caprani, Colin ;
Kiureghian, Armen Der ;
Duenas-Osorio, Leonardo ;
Galvao, Neryvaldo ;
Gilbert, Robert ;
Li, Jie ;
Matos, Jose ;
Mori, Yasuhiro ;
Papaioannou, Iason ;
Parades, Roger ;
Straub, Daniel ;
Sudret, Bruno .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2025, 113
[32]   Limitations of risk approaches [J].
Elms, David .
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) :2-16
[33]   RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION IN STRUCTURAL-ENGINEERING [J].
ENEVOLDSEN, I ;
SORENSEN, JD .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1994, 15 (03) :169-196
[34]   Design paradigms: Case histories of error and judgment in engineering - Petroski,H [J].
Ferguson, ES .
TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE, 1995, 36 (03) :696-697
[35]   STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION USING RELIABILITY CONCEPTS [J].
FRANGOPOL, DM .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1985, 111 (11) :2288-2301
[36]   Life-cycle reliability-based optimization of civil and aerospace structures [J].
Frangopol, DM ;
Maute, K .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2003, 81 (07) :397-410
[37]   Human error impact in structural safety of a reinforced concrete bridge [J].
Galvao, Neryvaldo ;
Matos, Jose C. ;
Oliveira, Daniel V. ;
Hajdin, Rade .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (06) :836-850
[38]   System risk modelling and decision-making - Reflections and common pitfalls [J].
Hoj, Niels Peter ;
Kroon, Inger Birgitte ;
Nielsen, Jannie Sonderkaer ;
Schubert, Matthias .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2025, 113
[39]   Analytical robustness assessment for robust design [J].
Huang, Beiqing ;
Du, Xiaoping .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2007, 34 (02) :123-137
[40]   Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? [J].
Kiureghian, Armen Der ;
Didevsen, Ove .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2009, 31 (02) :105-112