Social networks and transformative behaviours in a grassland social-ecological system

被引:2
作者
Nesbitt, Holly K. [1 ,6 ]
Metcalf, Alexander L. [1 ]
Floyd, Theresa M. [2 ]
Uden, Daniel R. [3 ,4 ]
Chaffin, Brian C. [1 ]
Gulab, Sabrina [5 ]
Banerjee, Simanti [5 ]
Vallury, Sechindra [1 ,7 ,8 ]
Hamlin, Samantha L. [3 ]
Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli [1 ]
Fogarty, Dillon T. [4 ]
Twidwell, Dirac [4 ]
Allen, Craig R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Dept Soc & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Univ Montana, Coll Business, Dept Management & Mkt, Missoula, MT USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Inst Agr & Nat Resources, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE USA
[5] Univ Nebraska, Inst Agr & Nat Resources, Agr Econ, Lincoln, NE USA
[6] Boise State Univ, Coll Innovat & Design, Human Environm Syst, Boise, ID USA
[7] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA USA
[8] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
adaptive capacity; collective action; livestock producer; prescribed burning; regime shift; social network analysis; transformation; woody encroachment; GREAT-PLAINS; POLICY NETWORKS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; KNOWLEDGE; RESILIENCE; TRUST; FIRE; COLLABORATION; EMBEDDEDNESS; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10695
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Social connections among individuals are essential components of social-ecological systems (SESs), enabling people to take actions to more effectively adapt or transform in response to widespread social-ecological change. Although scholars have associated social connections and cognitions with adaptive capacity, measuring actors' social networks may further clarify pathways for bolstering resilience-enhancing actions. We asked how social networks and socio-cognitions, as components of adaptive capacity, and SES regime shift severity affect individual landscape management behaviours using a quantitative analysis of ego network survey data from livestock producers and landcover data on regime shift severity (i.e. juniper encroachment) in the North American Great Plains. Producers who experienced severe regime shifts or perceived high risks from such shifts were not more likely to engage in transformative behaviour like prescribed burning. Instead, we found that social network characteristics explained significant variance in transformative behaviours. Policy implications: Our results indicate that social networks enable behaviours that have the potential to transform SESs, suggesting possible leverage points for enabling capacity and coordination toward sustainability. Particularly where private lands dominate and cultural practices condition regime shifts, clarifying how social connections promote resilience may provide much needed insight to bolster adaptive capacities in the face of global change.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页码:1877 / 1892
页数:16
相关论文
共 94 条
[51]   Simulations of agents in social networks harvesting a resource [J].
Little, L. R. ;
McDonald, A. D. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 204 (3-4) :379-386
[52]   Collective factors drive individual invasive species control behaviors: evidence from private lands in Montana, USA [J].
Lubeck, Alice A. ;
Metcalf, Alexander L. ;
Beckman, Crystal L. ;
Yung, Laurie ;
Angle, Justin W. .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (02)
[53]   Conservation Program Participation and Adaptive Rangeland Decision-Making [J].
Lubell, M. N. ;
Cutts, B. B. ;
Roche, L. M. ;
Hamilton, M. ;
Derner, J. D. ;
Kachergis, E. ;
Tate, K. W. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (06) :609-620
[54]   Local policy networks and agricultural watershed management [J].
Lubell, Mark ;
Fulton, Allan .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :673-696
[55]   RAD Adaptive Management for Transforming Ecosystems [J].
Lynch, Abigail J. ;
Thompson, Laura M. ;
Morton, John M. ;
Beever, Erik A. ;
Clifford, Michael ;
Limpinsel, Douglas ;
Magill, Robert T. ;
Magness, Dawn R. ;
Melvin, Tracy A. ;
Newman, Robert A. ;
Porath, Mark T. ;
Rahel, Frank J. ;
Reynolds, Joel H. ;
Schuurman, Gregor W. ;
Sethi, Suresh A. ;
Wilkening, Jennifer L. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2022, 72 (01) :45-56
[56]   Some primary producers are more likely to transform their agricultural practices in response to climate change than others [J].
Marshall, Nadine A. ;
Crimp, Steve ;
Curnock, Matt ;
Greenhill, Murni ;
Kuehne, Geoff ;
Leviston, Zoe ;
Ouzman, Jackie .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 222 :38-47
[57]   External exposure, boundary-spanning, and opinion leadership in remote communities: A network experiment [J].
Matous, Petr ;
Wang, Peng .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2019, 56 :10-22
[58]   Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks [J].
McPherson, M ;
Smith-Lovin, L ;
Cook, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 27 :415-444
[59]   Microtargeting for conservation [J].
Metcalf, Alexander L. ;
Phelan, Conor N. ;
Pallai, Cassandra ;
Norton, Michael ;
Yuhas, Ben ;
Finley, James C. ;
Muth, Allyson .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (05) :1141-1150
[60]  
Newig J, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15