Assessing the quality of breast cancer-related videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study

被引:1
|
作者
Qu, Yang [1 ]
Lian, Jie [1 ]
Pan, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhou, Yidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Breast cancer; TikTok; video quality assessment; social media; short video apps; SOCIAL MEDIA; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241277688
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Breast cancer, the most common cancer in women globally, highlights the need for patient education. Despite many breast cancer discussions on TikTok, their scientific evaluation is lacking. Our study seeks to assess the content quality and accuracy of popular TikTok videos on breast cancer, to improve the dissemination of health knowledge. Methods: On August 22, 2023, we collected the top 100 trending videos from TikTok's Chinese version using "breast cancer/breast nodule" as keywords. We noted their length, TikTok duration, likes, comments, favorites, reposts, uploader types, and topics. Four assessment tools were used: Goobie's six questions, the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT), the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and the Global Quality Score (GQS). These instruments evaluate videos based on content, informational integrity, and overall quality. Results: Among the 100 videos, content quality was low with Goobie's questions mostly scoring 0, except for management at 1.0 (QR 1.0). PEMAT scores were moderate: 54.1 (QR 1.6) for sum, 47.0 (QR 18.8) for PEMAT-A, and 52.3 (QR 11.7) for PEMAT-U. Regarding the quality of information, the VIQI (sum) median was 14.1 (QR 0.2). Additionally, the median GQS score was 3.5 (QR 0.1). Medical professionals' videos focused on breast cancer stages, while patient videos centered on personal experiences. Patient videos had lower content and overall quality compared to those by medical professionals (PEMAT, GQS: P < 0.001, P = 0.004) but received more comments, indicating higher engagement (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: TikTok's breast cancer content shows educational potential, but while informational quality is moderate, content quality needs improvement. Videos by medical professionals are of higher quality. We recommend increased involvement of healthcare professionals on TikTok to enhance content quality. Non-medical users should share verified information, and TikTok should strengthen its content vetting. Users must scrutinize the credibility of health information on social platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Algorithm-Based Risk Identification in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Nascimben, Mauro
    Lippi, Lorenzo
    De Sire, Alessandro
    Invernizzi, Marco
    Rimondini, Lia
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [42] Reliability and Educational Suitability of TikTok Videos as a Source of Information on Sleep and Awake Bruxism: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
    Cannata, Davide
    Galdi, Marzio
    Russo, Alessio
    Scelza, Carmine
    Michelotti, Ambrosina
    Martina, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [43] The reliability and quality of short videos as health information of guidance for lymphedema: a cross-sectional study
    Zhou, Xuchuan
    Ma, Gejia
    Su, Xuefeng
    Li, Xinyi
    Wang, Wenfei
    Xia, Linxi
    Yang, Chen
    Liu, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 12
  • [44] Lifestyle correlates of eight breast cancer-related metabolites: a cross-sectional study within the EPIC cohort
    His, Mathilde
    Viallon, Vivian
    Dossus, Laure
    Schmidt, Julie A.
    Travis, Ruth C.
    Gunter, Marc J.
    Overvad, Kim
    Kyro, Cecilie
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Lecuyer, Lucie
    Rothwell, Joseph A.
    Severi, Gianluca
    Johnson, Theron
    Katzke, Verena
    Schulze, Matthias B.
    Masala, Giovanna
    Sieri, Sabina
    Panico, Salvatore
    Tumino, Rosario
    Macciotta, Alessandra
    Boer, Jolanda M. A.
    Monninkhof, Evelyn M.
    Olsen, Karina Standahl
    Nost, Therese H.
    Sandanger, Torkjel M.
    Agudo, Antonio
    Sanchez, Maria-Jose
    Amiano, Pilar
    Colorado-Yohar, Sandra M.
    Ardanaz, Eva
    Vidman, Linda
    Winkvist, Anna
    Heath, Alicia K.
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Huybrechts, Inge
    Rinaldi, Sabina
    BMC MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [45] Evaluation of Vitamin D Levels in Patients with Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: An Observational Cross-sectional Study
    Ozcan, Didem Sezgin
    Dalyan, Meltem
    Ergul, Serhat
    Delialioglu, Sibel Unsal
    Koseoglu, Belma Fusun
    TURK OSTEOPOROZ DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2019, 25 (03): : 105 - 110
  • [46] Quality of information in #brokenfileremoval Reels videos on Instagram: a cross-sectional study
    Hancerliogullari, Dilek
    Ceylanoglu, Eray
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2023,
  • [47] An analysis of information about infantile hemangiomas on TikTok: A cross-sectional study
    Yun, Sonora
    Garzon, Maria C.
    Morel, Kimberly D.
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (02) : 253 - 255
  • [48] Biologics to breast milk: A cross-sectional study of popular eczema treatment content on TikTok
    Khan, Sabrina
    Yee, Danielle
    Khan, Samiya
    Mehta, Manan
    Zagona-Prizio, Caterina
    Maynard, Nicole
    Reddy, Rasika
    Armstrong, April W.
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 39 (06) : 920 - 922
  • [49] Analyzing ankyloglossia information on TikTok: A cross-sectional study
    Mozzochi, Kathryn
    Martin, Gabrielle
    Chorney, Stephen R.
    Sobin, Lindsay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 193
  • [50] The Mediating Role of Gut Microbiota on the Association Between Dietary Quality and Cancer-Related Fatigue Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    He, Jianyun
    Cheng, Lan
    Cheng, Xinxin
    Wang, Yuting
    Lin, Xiaoxia
    Xia, Shufang
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (24)