Assessing the quality of breast cancer-related videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study

被引:1
|
作者
Qu, Yang [1 ]
Lian, Jie [1 ]
Pan, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhou, Yidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Breast cancer; TikTok; video quality assessment; social media; short video apps; SOCIAL MEDIA; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241277688
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Breast cancer, the most common cancer in women globally, highlights the need for patient education. Despite many breast cancer discussions on TikTok, their scientific evaluation is lacking. Our study seeks to assess the content quality and accuracy of popular TikTok videos on breast cancer, to improve the dissemination of health knowledge. Methods: On August 22, 2023, we collected the top 100 trending videos from TikTok's Chinese version using "breast cancer/breast nodule" as keywords. We noted their length, TikTok duration, likes, comments, favorites, reposts, uploader types, and topics. Four assessment tools were used: Goobie's six questions, the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT), the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and the Global Quality Score (GQS). These instruments evaluate videos based on content, informational integrity, and overall quality. Results: Among the 100 videos, content quality was low with Goobie's questions mostly scoring 0, except for management at 1.0 (QR 1.0). PEMAT scores were moderate: 54.1 (QR 1.6) for sum, 47.0 (QR 18.8) for PEMAT-A, and 52.3 (QR 11.7) for PEMAT-U. Regarding the quality of information, the VIQI (sum) median was 14.1 (QR 0.2). Additionally, the median GQS score was 3.5 (QR 0.1). Medical professionals' videos focused on breast cancer stages, while patient videos centered on personal experiences. Patient videos had lower content and overall quality compared to those by medical professionals (PEMAT, GQS: P < 0.001, P = 0.004) but received more comments, indicating higher engagement (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: TikTok's breast cancer content shows educational potential, but while informational quality is moderate, content quality needs improvement. Videos by medical professionals are of higher quality. We recommend increased involvement of healthcare professionals on TikTok to enhance content quality. Non-medical users should share verified information, and TikTok should strengthen its content vetting. Users must scrutinize the credibility of health information on social platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] #Neurosurgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Neurosurgical Content on TikTok
    Mcbriar, Joshua D.
    Mishra, Akash
    Shah, Harshal A.
    Boockvar, John A.
    Langer, David J.
    D'Amico, Randy S.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY-X, 2023, 17
  • [32] A cross-sectional quality assessment of TikTok content on benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Hoi Pong Nicholas Wong
    Wei Zheng So
    Vikneshwaren Senthamil Selvan
    Jing Yang Lee
    Collin Elijah Rui Hong Ho
    Ho Yee Tiong
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 3051 - 3057
  • [33] Assessing the content and quality of GI bleeding information on Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube: a cross-sectional study
    Jingsong Wang
    Bingxi Liu
    Guang Yang
    Yixing Luo
    Nonghua Lv
    Xu Shu
    Zhenhua Zhu
    Linlin Liu
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [34] Promoting Mask Use on TikTok: Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study
    Basch, Corey H.
    Fera, Joseph
    Pierce, Isabela
    Basch, Charles E.
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [35] Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis
    Liang, Jing
    Wang, Linlin
    Song, Shijie
    Dong, Man
    Xu, Yidan
    Zuo, Xinyu
    Zhang, Jingyi
    Sherif, Akil Adrian
    Ehsan, Jafree
    Ma, Jianjun
    Li, Pengyang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (09)
  • [36] TikTok and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a cross-sectional study of social media content quality
    Jafri, Faraz I.
    Ancha, Nirupama
    Roy, Ananya
    Ahmad, Sami
    Riaz, Hamna
    Hyman, Charles
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2025, 33 (03): : 653 - 658
  • [37] Keratosis pilaris on TikTok: A cross-sectional analysis of trending content
    Mansour, Meghan R.
    Abushukur, Yasmine
    Potts, Geoffrey A.
    JAAD INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 8 : 116 - 117
  • [38] Monkeypox Content on TikTok: Cross-sectional Analysis
    Ji-Xu, Antonio
    Htet, Kyaw Zin
    Leslie, Kieron S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [39] Sleep Quality and Related Factors in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan
    Weng, Yi-Ping
    Hong, Rei-Mei
    Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung
    Tsai, Chia-Jui
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Fang, Yu-Hung
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 13 : 4725 - 4733
  • [40] Lifestyle correlates of eight breast cancer-related metabolites: a cross-sectional study within the EPIC cohort
    Mathilde His
    Vivian Viallon
    Laure Dossus
    Julie A. Schmidt
    Ruth C. Travis
    Marc J. Gunter
    Kim Overvad
    Cecilie Kyrø
    Anne Tjønneland
    Lucie Lécuyer
    Joseph A. Rothwell
    Gianluca Severi
    Theron Johnson
    Verena Katzke
    Matthias B. Schulze
    Giovanna Masala
    Sabina Sieri
    Salvatore Panico
    Rosario Tumino
    Alessandra Macciotta
    Jolanda M. A. Boer
    Evelyn M. Monninkhof
    Karina Standahl Olsen
    Therese H. Nøst
    Torkjel M. Sandanger
    Antonio Agudo
    Maria-Jose Sánchez
    Pilar Amiano
    Sandra M. Colorado-Yohar
    Eva Ardanaz
    Linda Vidman
    Anna Winkvist
    Alicia K. Heath
    Elisabete Weiderpass
    Inge Huybrechts
    Sabina Rinaldi
    BMC Medicine, 19