Assessing the quality of breast cancer-related videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study

被引:1
|
作者
Qu, Yang [1 ]
Lian, Jie [1 ]
Pan, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhou, Yidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Breast cancer; TikTok; video quality assessment; social media; short video apps; SOCIAL MEDIA; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241277688
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Breast cancer, the most common cancer in women globally, highlights the need for patient education. Despite many breast cancer discussions on TikTok, their scientific evaluation is lacking. Our study seeks to assess the content quality and accuracy of popular TikTok videos on breast cancer, to improve the dissemination of health knowledge. Methods: On August 22, 2023, we collected the top 100 trending videos from TikTok's Chinese version using "breast cancer/breast nodule" as keywords. We noted their length, TikTok duration, likes, comments, favorites, reposts, uploader types, and topics. Four assessment tools were used: Goobie's six questions, the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT), the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and the Global Quality Score (GQS). These instruments evaluate videos based on content, informational integrity, and overall quality. Results: Among the 100 videos, content quality was low with Goobie's questions mostly scoring 0, except for management at 1.0 (QR 1.0). PEMAT scores were moderate: 54.1 (QR 1.6) for sum, 47.0 (QR 18.8) for PEMAT-A, and 52.3 (QR 11.7) for PEMAT-U. Regarding the quality of information, the VIQI (sum) median was 14.1 (QR 0.2). Additionally, the median GQS score was 3.5 (QR 0.1). Medical professionals' videos focused on breast cancer stages, while patient videos centered on personal experiences. Patient videos had lower content and overall quality compared to those by medical professionals (PEMAT, GQS: P < 0.001, P = 0.004) but received more comments, indicating higher engagement (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: TikTok's breast cancer content shows educational potential, but while informational quality is moderate, content quality needs improvement. Videos by medical professionals are of higher quality. We recommend increased involvement of healthcare professionals on TikTok to enhance content quality. Non-medical users should share verified information, and TikTok should strengthen its content vetting. Users must scrutinize the credibility of health information on social platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study
    Zheng, Shusen
    Tong, Xinyu
    Wan, Dalong
    Hu, Chen
    Hu, Qing
    Ke, Qinghong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [2] Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China
    Liu, Hui
    Peng, Jialun
    Li, Lu
    Deng, Ao
    Huang, Xiangxin
    Yin, Guobin
    Ming, Jia
    Luo, Haojun
    Liang, Yinyin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 11
  • [3] Information quality of videos related to Helicobacter pylori infection on TikTok: Cross-sectional study
    Tan, Wei
    Liu, Yilong
    Shi, Zhiwen
    Zheng, Bainan
    Feng, Lingmei
    Wang, Jian
    Wang, Xiaohang
    Yuan, Zongli
    HELICOBACTER, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [4] Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study
    Sun, Fei
    Zheng, Shusen
    Wu, Jian
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [5] TikTok and #OccupationalTherapy: Cross-sectional Study
    Chasca, Whitney
    Nerada, Samantha
    Zenone, Marco
    Barbic, Skye
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 7
  • [6] Analyzing dissemination, quality, and reliability of Chinese brain tumor-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study
    Zhang, Ren
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Jie, Hui
    Guo, Yi
    Liu, Yi
    Yang, Yuan
    Li, Chuan
    Guo, Chenglin
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [7] Gone Viral: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Contact Lens-Related Videos on TikTok
    Costantini, Julia G.
    Yang, Aaron Goh Qi
    Steinemann, Thomas L.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 48 (11): : 479 - 484
  • [8] A cross-sectional content quality analysis of information in TikTok videos on "Dermarolling (Roller Microneedling)"
    Awad, Nardin
    Hetzel, John
    Bhupalam, Vishnu
    Nestor, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 23 (09) : 2996 - 2999
  • [9] Evaluating the Quality of Cancer-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study
    Pan, Peng
    Yu, Changhua
    Li, Tao
    Dai, Tingting
    Tian, Hanhan
    Xiong, Yaozu
    Lv, Jie
    Hu, Xiaochu
    Ma, Weidong
    Yin, Wenda
    JMIR CANCER, 2024, 10
  • [10] Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok
    Babar, Mustufa
    Loloi, Justin
    Patel, Rutul D.
    Singh, Sandeep
    Azhar, Umair
    Maria, Pedro
    Small, Alexander
    Watts, Kara
    ANDROLOGIA, 2022, 54 (05)