Assessing the quality of breast cancer-related videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study

被引:3
作者
Qu, Yang [1 ]
Lian, Jie [1 ]
Pan, Bo [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahui [1 ]
Zhou, Yidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; TikTok; video quality assessment; social media; short video apps; SOCIAL MEDIA; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1177/20552076241277688
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Breast cancer, the most common cancer in women globally, highlights the need for patient education. Despite many breast cancer discussions on TikTok, their scientific evaluation is lacking. Our study seeks to assess the content quality and accuracy of popular TikTok videos on breast cancer, to improve the dissemination of health knowledge. Methods: On August 22, 2023, we collected the top 100 trending videos from TikTok's Chinese version using "breast cancer/breast nodule" as keywords. We noted their length, TikTok duration, likes, comments, favorites, reposts, uploader types, and topics. Four assessment tools were used: Goobie's six questions, the Patient Educational Material Assessment Tool (PEMAT), the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and the Global Quality Score (GQS). These instruments evaluate videos based on content, informational integrity, and overall quality. Results: Among the 100 videos, content quality was low with Goobie's questions mostly scoring 0, except for management at 1.0 (QR 1.0). PEMAT scores were moderate: 54.1 (QR 1.6) for sum, 47.0 (QR 18.8) for PEMAT-A, and 52.3 (QR 11.7) for PEMAT-U. Regarding the quality of information, the VIQI (sum) median was 14.1 (QR 0.2). Additionally, the median GQS score was 3.5 (QR 0.1). Medical professionals' videos focused on breast cancer stages, while patient videos centered on personal experiences. Patient videos had lower content and overall quality compared to those by medical professionals (PEMAT, GQS: P < 0.001, P = 0.004) but received more comments, indicating higher engagement (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: TikTok's breast cancer content shows educational potential, but while informational quality is moderate, content quality needs improvement. Videos by medical professionals are of higher quality. We recommend increased involvement of healthcare professionals on TikTok to enhance content quality. Non-medical users should share verified information, and TikTok should strengthen its content vetting. Users must scrutinize the credibility of health information on social platforms.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Basch CH., 2022, JMIR Cancer, V8
[2]   A global pandemic in the time of viral memes: COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation on TikTok [J].
Basch, Corey H. ;
Meleo-Erwin, Zoe ;
Fera, Joseph ;
Jaime, Christie ;
Basch, Charles E. .
HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (08) :2373-2377
[3]  
Basch Corey H, 2022, Int J Adolesc Med Health, V34, P367, DOI 10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111
[4]   Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review [J].
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Sheridan, Stacey L. ;
Donahue, Katrina E. ;
Halpern, David J. ;
Crotty, Karen .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (02) :97-+
[5]   A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the world wide web [J].
Bernard, Andre ;
Langille, Morgan ;
Hughes, Stephanie ;
Rose, Caren ;
Leddin, Desmond ;
van Zanten, Sander Veldhuyzen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (09) :2070-2077
[6]   Older adults' credibility assessment of online health information: An exploratory study using an extended typology of web credibility [J].
Choi, Wonchan .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 71 (11) :1295-1307
[7]   Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media [J].
Chou, Wen-Ying Sylvia ;
Oh, April ;
Klein, William M. P. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (23) :2417-2418
[8]   "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media [J].
Dobrossy, Bence ;
Girasek, Edmond ;
Susanszky, Anna ;
Koncz, Zsuzsa ;
Gyorffy, Zsuzsa ;
Bognar, Virag Katalin .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04)
[9]  
Donner A, 1998, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V15, P627, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1998)15:6<627::AID-GEPI6>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-G