Climate policy curves highlight key mitigation choices

被引:0
|
作者
Haensel, Martin C. [1 ]
Bauer, Michael D. [2 ,3 ]
Drupp, Moritz A. [4 ,5 ]
Wagner, Gernot [6 ]
Rudebusch, Glenn D. [3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Fac Econ & Management Sci, Grimma Str 12, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Fed Reserve Bank San Francisco, Dept Econ Res, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Ctr Econ & Policy Res, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Hamburg, Dept Econ, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Hamburg, Ctr Earth Syst Res & Sustainabil CEN, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Columbia Business Sch, Fac Business, Econ Div, New York, NY USA
[7] Brookings Inst, Hutchins Ctr Fiscal & Monetary Policy, Washington, DC USA
[8] NYU, Wagner Sch Publ Serv, New York, NY USA
关键词
Climate policy; carbon tax; climate-economy models; model comparison; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2024.2392744
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The extent of future climate change is largely a policy choice. We illuminate this choice with climate policy curves (CPCs), which link climate policies to subsequent global temperatures. The estimated downward sloping CPCs highlight the key trade-off between initial policy ambition, expressed via an overall effective carbon price, and the subsequent policy burden left for future generations. We also demonstrate how different CPCs can illustrate the range of climate policy paths towards attaining the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Based on the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) integrated-assessment model scenarios, we estimate an implicit CPC, which provides a high-level summary of assumptions underlying the IPCC's assessment about climate policy trade-offs. We show that by virtue of their reductionism, CPCs serve as a useful model diagnostic and communication tool for climate policy discussions.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 510
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Harmonizing existing climate change mitigation policy datasets with a hybrid machine learning approach
    Wu, Libo
    Huang, Zhihao
    Zhang, Xing
    Wang, Yushi
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [22] Application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) to climate change mitigation policy: A systematic review
    Babatunde, Kazeem Alasinrin
    Begum, Rawshan Ara
    Said, Fathin Faizah
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 61 - 71
  • [23] Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options
    O'Neill, Brian C.
    Riahi, Keywan
    Keppo, Ilkka
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (03) : 1011 - 1016
  • [24] Affordable and sustainable transportation: Key drivers and policy choices for a megacity in India
    Ghosh, Tanmay
    Kanitkar, Tejal
    Srikanth, R.
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2023, 13
  • [25] The role of bioenergy in Ukraine's climate mitigation policy by 2050
    Chepeliev, Maksym
    Diachuk, Oleksandr
    Podolets, Roman
    Trypolska, Galyna
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 152
  • [26] Does leadership promote cooperation in climate change mitigation policy?
    Saul, Ulrike
    Seidel, Christian
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2011, 11 (02) : 901 - 921
  • [27] Policy forum: Nationally-determined climate commitments of the BRICS: At the forefront of forestry-based climate change mitigation
    Bhan, Manan
    Sharma, Dhruba
    Ashwin, A. S.
    Mehra, Swapan
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 85 : 172 - 175
  • [28] Sequential climate change policy
    Parson, Edward A.
    Karwat, Darshan
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 2 (05) : 744 - 756
  • [29] Comparing public rationales for justice trade-offs in mitigation and adaptation climate policy dilemmas
    Klinsky, Sonja
    Dowlatabadi, Hadi
    McDaniels, Timothy
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (04): : 862 - 876
  • [30] Climate change mitigation policy in Ecuador: Effects of land-use competition and transaction costs
    Ortega-Pacheco, Daniel V.
    Keeler, Andrew G.
    Jiang, Shiguo
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 81 : 302 - 310