Do Boards Reward and Punish CEOs Based on Employee Satisfaction Ratings?

被引:1
作者
Abdulsalam, Khaled [1 ]
Christensen, Dane M. [2 ]
Graffin, Scott D. [3 ]
Li, John [4 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Coll Business Adm, Kuwait 12037, Kuwait
[2] Univ Oregon, Lundquist Coll Business, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Ted Rogers Sch Management, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
关键词
corporate governance; statistics and analyses; methods panel; strategy and policy; top management teams; succession; compensation; human resource management; strategic human resources management; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; JOB-SATISFACTION; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; CERTIFICATION CONTESTS; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; REPUTATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2021.15818
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We investigate whether boards of directors reward and punish chief executive officers (CEOs) based on employee satisfaction ratings. Using data from Glassdoor, we find that CEOs tend to receive larger bonuses when employee satisfaction ratings increase. Similarly, we find a higher rate of CEO dismissal when employees become less satisfied. Further, we investigate three factors that may amplify the role of employee satisfaction ratings in CEO evaluations: the importance of employees to financial performance, the board's commitment to stakeholders, and the need to preserve firm reputation. We find some evidence that each of these three factors strengthens the relationship between employee satisfaction ratings and CEO evaluations. Finally, we exploit the staggered timing of first-time reviews on Glassdoor and use a difference-in-differences design to strengthen our inferences. Collectively, these findings suggest that boards' evaluations of CEO compensation and retention incorporate employee satisfaction ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 902
页数:22
相关论文
共 141 条
  • [1] ABOWD JM, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P774
  • [2] Adams S., 2016, FORBES
  • [3] Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations
    Aguilera, Ruth V.
    Rupp, Deborah E.
    Williams, Cynthia A.
    Ganapathi, Jyoti
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) : 836 - 863
  • [4] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2022, ESG Global Study 2022
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
  • [7] How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? *
    Baker, Andrew C.
    Larcker, David F.
    Wang, Charles C. Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 144 (02) : 370 - 395
  • [8] High-quality work, job satisfaction, and occupational injuries
    Barling, J
    Kelloway, EK
    Iverson, RD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (02) : 276 - 283
  • [9] Why does affect matter in organizations?
    Barsade, Sigal G.
    Gibson, Donald E.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (01) : 36 - 59
  • [10] Corporate Social Responsibility and the Market Reaction to Negative Events: Evidence from Inadvertent and Fraudulent Restatement Announcements
    Bartov, Eli
    Marra, Antonio
    Momente, Francesco
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 96 (02) : 81 - 106