Seismic Performance Factors of Elliptic-Braced Frames with Rotational Friction Dampers through IDA

被引:6
作者
Jouneghani, Habib Ghasemi [1 ]
Nouri, Younes [2 ]
Mortazavi, Mina [3 ]
Haghollahi, Abbas [1 ]
Memarzadeh, Parham [4 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training Univ, Dept Civil Engn, POB 16785-163, Tehran, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Civil Engn, Azadi Sq,POB 9177948974, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, 15 Broadway,POB 123, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Najafabad Branch, Dept Civil Engn, Najafabad 8514143131, Iran
关键词
Elliptic brace; Rotational friction damper (RFD); Response modification factor; Overstrength factor; Ductility factor; Fragility curve; Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA); RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTORS; TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS; HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; STIFFNESS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1540
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In recent decades, various strategies have been employed to enhance the seismic resilience of structural systems in the event of earthquakes. One such innovative method is the elliptic-braced moment-resisting frame with a rotational friction damper (ELBRF-RFD), which serves as a displacement-restraint bracing technique connecting the elliptic brace to the upper beam. To design an ELBRF-RFD based on contemporary guidelines, for the first time, this study introduces the quantification of seismic performance factors (SPFs) through incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). The research then proceeded to design 3-story, 5-story, and 7-story archetypes in type II soil using the presumed SPFs. A comparative analysis was conducted with inverted-V braced frames equipped with rotational friction dampers (CBF-RFDs). The performance of each archetype was evaluated through nonlinear static pushover analysis (NSPA) and IDA, employing 15 earthquake records from the past and using the OpenSees software. For the response modification factor, suggested values of 11.2 (allowable stress method) and 7.8 (ultimate limit state methods) were identified. Furthermore, the collapse probability of archetypes was determined by employing fragility curves and considering sources of uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ATC-24
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
[4]   Seismic response of MRFs with partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column connections through FE analyses [J].
Brunesi, E. ;
Nascimbene, R. ;
Rassati, G. A. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2015, 107 :37-49
[5]  
Center PEER, 2000, Strong ground motion database
[6]   Performance evaluation of a nonlinear energy sink with quasi-zero stiffness property for vertical vibration control [J].
Chen, Peng ;
Wang, Bin ;
Zhou, Dingsong ;
Wu, Xiaobin ;
Dai, Kaoshan .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 282
[7]   NUMERICAL STUDY OF BLAST-RESISTANT SANDWICH PANELS WITH ROTATIONAL FRICTION DAMPERS [J].
Chen, Wensu ;
Hao, Hong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2013, 13 (06)
[8]  
Chopra A.K., 2007, Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering
[9]  
CONSTANTINOU MC, 1991, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V7, P179, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1585625
[10]   Investigation of the effect of real ground motion record number on seismic response of regular and vertically irregular RC frames [J].
Demir, Ahmet .
STRUCTURES, 2022, 39 :1074-1091