Exploring the MAPPING application to facilitate risk communication and shared decision-making between physicians and patients with gynaecological cancer

被引:0
作者
Koning, Mijra [1 ]
Lok, Christianne [2 ,3 ]
Ubbink, Dirk T. [1 ]
Aarts, Johanna Wilhelmina Maria [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Gynecol Oncol Amsterdam CGOA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] NKI, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam UMC, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Locat VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
关键词
Shared decision making; Obstetrics and gynecology; Decision support; clinical; HEALTH LITERACY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; REPORTED MEASURE; COMPREHENSION; COLLABORATE; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; OPTION5; FORMATS; LADDER;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002776
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This is an observational study in which we evaluated current levels of risk communication (RC) among gynaecological oncologists and their view on the Mapping All Patient Probabilities in Numerical Graphs (MAPPING) application as a possible tool to facilitate RC and shared decision-making (SDM). In part A, we audio-recorded 29 conversations between gynaecological oncologists and patients when discussing treatment options. In part B, interviews were performed with eight gynaecological oncologists. RC and SDM were measured using two observer-based measures, that is, the RC content (RCC) tool (scale 0-2) and the OPTION-5 instrument (scale 0-100). We used CollaboRATE questionnaire (scale 0-10) and a self-developed survey to assess patient-reported RC and SDM. In part B, we evaluated physicians' attitudes regarding the use of the MAPPING application to support RC. Patients were minimally involved in the decision-making process (OPTION-5 25.9%+/- 13.4 RCC 0.21 +/- 0.18). Patient-reported SDM was high (mean collaboRATE score 9.19 +/- 1.79) and patients preferred receiving numeric information, whereas most physicians used qualitative risk terms rather than exact numbers. In part B, gynaecologists had a positive attitude towards the MAPPING application. However, they stated that the app was difficult to use improvement of layout and better implementations are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts [J].
Trevena, Lyndal J. ;
Bonner, Carissa ;
Okan, Yasmina ;
Peters, Ellen ;
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang ;
Han, Paul K. J. ;
Ozanne, Elissa ;
Timmermans, Danielle ;
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) :834-847
[42]   Communicating treatment risks and benefits to cancer patients: a systematic review of communication methods [J].
van de Water, L. F. ;
van Kleef, J. J. ;
Dijksterhuis, W. P. M. ;
Henselmans, I ;
van den Boorn, H. G. ;
Morel, N. M. Vaarzon ;
Schut, K. F. ;
Daams, J. G. ;
Smets, E. M. A. ;
van Laarhoven, H. W. M. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (07) :1747-1766
[43]   Development of a plain-language guide for discussing breast cancer genetic counseling and testing with patients with limited health literacy [J].
van der Giessen, J. A. M. ;
Ausems, M. G. E. M. ;
van Riel, E. ;
de Jong, A. ;
Fransen, M. P. ;
van Dulmen, S. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (06) :2895-2905
[44]   Cocreation with Dutch patients of decision-relevant information to support shared decision-making about adjuvant treatment in breast cancer care [J].
van Strien-Knippenberg, Inge S. ;
Boshuizen, Marieke C. S. ;
Determann, Domino ;
de Boer, Jasmijn H. ;
Damman, Olga C. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (04) :1664-1677
[45]   Do prostate cancer patients want to choose their own radiation treatment? [J].
van Tol-Geerdink, Julia J. ;
Stalmeier, Peep F. M. ;
van Lin, Emile N. J. T. ;
Schimmel, Erik C. ;
Huizenga, Henk ;
van Daal, Wim A. J. ;
Leer, Jan-Willem .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (04) :1105-1111
[46]   Communicating tailored risk information of cancer treatment side effects: Only words or also numbers? [J].
Vromans, Ruben D. ;
Pauws, Steffen C. ;
Bol, Nadine ;
van de Poll-franse, Lonneke V. ;
Krahmer, Emiel J. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (01)
[47]   Risk Ladder, Table, or Bulleted List? Identifying Formats That Effectively Communicate Personalized Risk and Risk Reduction Information for Multiple Diseases [J].
Waters, Erika A. ;
Maki, Julia ;
Liu, Ying ;
Ackermann, Nicole ;
Carter, Chelsey R. ;
Dart, Hank ;
Bowen, Deborah J. ;
Cameron, Linda D. ;
Colditz, Graham A. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (01) :74-88
[48]   Variability in the interpretation of probability phrases used in Dutch news articles - a risk for miscommunication [J].
Willems, Sanne ;
Albers, Casper ;
Smeets, Ionica .
JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2020, 19 (02)
[49]   Health literacy and functional health status among older adults [J].
Wolf, MS ;
Gazmararian, JA ;
Baker, DW .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (17) :1946-1952
[50]   Evidence-Based Risk Communication A Systematic Review [J].
Zipkin, Daniella A. ;
Umscheid, Craig A. ;
Keating, Nancy L. ;
Allen, Elizabeth ;
Aung, Koko ;
Beyth, Rebecca ;
Kaatz, Scott ;
Mann, Devin M. ;
Sussman, Jeremy B. ;
Korenstein, Deborah ;
Schardt, Connie ;
Nagi, Avishek ;
Sloane, Richard ;
Feldstein, David A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 161 (04) :270-+