Exploring the MAPPING application to facilitate risk communication and shared decision-making between physicians and patients with gynaecological cancer

被引:0
作者
Koning, Mijra [1 ]
Lok, Christianne [2 ,3 ]
Ubbink, Dirk T. [1 ]
Aarts, Johanna Wilhelmina Maria [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Gynecol Oncol Amsterdam CGOA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] NKI, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam UMC, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Locat VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
关键词
Shared decision making; Obstetrics and gynecology; Decision support; clinical; HEALTH LITERACY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; REPORTED MEASURE; COMPREHENSION; COLLABORATE; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; OPTION5; FORMATS; LADDER;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002776
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This is an observational study in which we evaluated current levels of risk communication (RC) among gynaecological oncologists and their view on the Mapping All Patient Probabilities in Numerical Graphs (MAPPING) application as a possible tool to facilitate RC and shared decision-making (SDM). In part A, we audio-recorded 29 conversations between gynaecological oncologists and patients when discussing treatment options. In part B, interviews were performed with eight gynaecological oncologists. RC and SDM were measured using two observer-based measures, that is, the RC content (RCC) tool (scale 0-2) and the OPTION-5 instrument (scale 0-100). We used CollaboRATE questionnaire (scale 0-10) and a self-developed survey to assess patient-reported RC and SDM. In part B, we evaluated physicians' attitudes regarding the use of the MAPPING application to support RC. Patients were minimally involved in the decision-making process (OPTION-5 25.9%+/- 13.4 RCC 0.21 +/- 0.18). Patient-reported SDM was high (mean collaboRATE score 9.19 +/- 1.79) and patients preferred receiving numeric information, whereas most physicians used qualitative risk terms rather than exact numbers. In part B, gynaecologists had a positive attitude towards the MAPPING application. However, they stated that the app was difficult to use improvement of layout and better implementations are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of an adjective-selection measure evaluating clinicians' attitudes towards using patient decision aids: The ADOPT measure
    Aarts, Johanna W. M.
    Dannenberg, Michelle D.
    Scalia, Peter
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (08) : 2785 - 2792
  • [2] The Psychometric Properties of CollaboRATE: A Fast and Frugal Patient-Reported Measure of the Shared Decision-Making Process
    Barr, Paul James
    Thompson, Rachel
    Walsh, Thom
    Grande, Stuart W.
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (01)
  • [3] Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement
    Cabana, MD
    Rand, CS
    Powe, NR
    Wu, AW
    Wilson, MH
    Abboud, PAC
    Rubin, HR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15): : 1458 - 1465
  • [4] Discussing life expectancy with surgical patients: Do patients want to know and how should this information be delivered?
    Clarke, Michael G.
    Kennedy, Katherine P.
    MacDonagh, Ruaraidh P.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [5] Nomograms for Prediction of Outcome With or Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of PORTEC-1 and PORTEC-2 Trials
    Creutzberg, Carien L.
    van Stiphout, Ruud G. P. M.
    Nout, Remi A.
    Lutgens, Ludy C. H. W.
    Juergenliemk-Schulz, Ina M.
    Jobsen, Jan J.
    Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M.
    Lambin, Philippe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 91 (03): : 530 - 539
  • [6] Development of three different decision support tools to support shared decision-making in vascular surgery
    de Mik, Sylvana M. L.
    Stubenrouch, Fabienne E.
    Balm, Ron
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (02) : 282 - 289
  • [7] Dirk T Ubbink P., 2021, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V165
  • [8] Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures
    Edwards, A
    Elwyn, G
    Mulley, A
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7341): : 827 - 830
  • [9] Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION5 Item
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Tsulukidze, Maka
    Edwards, Adrian
    Legare, France
    Newcombe, Robert
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 93 (02) : 265 - 271
  • [10] Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Barr, Paul James
    Grande, Stuart W.
    Thompson, Rachel
    Walsh, Thom
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 93 (01) : 102 - 107