Association between psychosocial factors and left ventricular assist device implant outcomes: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Joy J. [1 ]
Bhasin, Shreya [1 ]
Levstik, Johannes [1 ]
Walsh, Patrick [1 ]
Oldham, Mark A. [1 ]
Lee, Hochang Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, 300 Crittenden Blvd,Box PSYCH, Rochester, NY 14625 USA
关键词
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD); Transplant psychiatry; psychosocial assessment; Risk factors; Predictor; Outcome; TRANSPLANTATION; NONADHERENCE; MEDICATION; SUPPORT; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.007
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Psychosocial assessment is a core component of the multidisciplinary evaluation for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The degree to which psychosocial conditions are considered a contraindication to LVAD implantation continues to be debated. This systematic review examines modifiable psychosocial factors as predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search resulted in 2509 articles. After deduplication, abstract and full- text review, 20 relevant articles were identified. Results: Included studies evaluated socioeconomic status (n n = 6), caregiver characteristics (n n = 6), non-adherence (n n = 6), substance use (n n = 13), and psychiatric disorder (n n = 8). The most commonly measured outcomes were all-cause death, readmission rate, and adverse events. Studies varied widely in definition of each psychosocial factor and selected outcomes. No psychosocial factor was consistently associated with a specific outcome in all studies. Socioeconomic status was generally not associated with outcomes. Non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were associated with higher risks of mortality, adverse events, and/or readmission. Findings on caregiver characteristics were mixed. Conclusion: Of the psychosocial factors studied, non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were the most consistently associated with an increased risk of mortality, readmission, and/or adverse events. Heterogeneity in research methodology and study quality across studies precludes firm conclusions regarding the impact of psychosocial factors on long-term patient outcomes. The results of this review reveal a need for adequately powered studies that use uniform definitions of psychosocial factors to clarify relationships between these factors and outcomes after LVAD implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 140
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation
    Mariani, Silvia
    Li, Tong
    Bounader, Karl
    Boethig, Dietmar
    Schoede, Alexandra
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Michaelis, Jana
    Napp, L. Christian
    Berliner, Dominik
    Dogan, Guenes
    Lorusso, Roberto
    Haverich, Axel
    Schmitto, Jan D.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 10 (02) : 255 - +
  • [42] Vasoplegia following heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device explant is not associated with inferior outcomes
    Ali, Jason M.
    Patel, Serena
    Catarino, Pedro
    Vuylsteke, Alain
    Pettit, Stephen
    Bhagra, Sai
    Kydd, Anna
    Lewis, Clive
    Parameshwar, Jayan
    Kaul, Pradeep
    Sudarshan, Catherine
    Tsui, Steven
    Jenkins, David
    Abu-Omar, Yasir
    Berman, Marius
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2020, 12 (05) : 2426 - 2434
  • [43] Microparticles and left ventricular assist device complications: A causal association?
    Shah, Keyur B.
    Kontos, Michael. C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (05): : 468 - 469
  • [44] Anemia and outcomes following left ventricular assist device implantation
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    Narang, Nikhil
    Besser, Stephanie
    Rodgers, Daniel
    Combs, Pamela
    Siddiqi, Umar
    Stonebraker, Corinne
    Jeevanandam, Valluvan
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 46 (08) : 1626 - 1635
  • [45] Association of thrombophilia prospective detection with hemocompatibility related outcomes in left ventricular assist device patients
    Konarik, Miroslav
    Netuka, Ivan
    Ivak, Peter
    Riha, Hynek
    Tucanova, Zuzana
    Wohlfahrt, Peter
    Maly, Jiri
    Szarszoi, Ondrej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2021, 44 (11): : 838 - 845
  • [46] Outcomes after stroke complicating left ventricular assist device
    Willey, Joshua Z.
    Gavalas, Michael. V.
    Trinh, Pauline N.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Garan, A. Reshad
    Levin, Allison P.
    Takeda, Koji
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Fried, Justin
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Topkara, Veli K.
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (08): : 1003 - 1009
  • [47] Diabetes and outcomes after left ventricular assist device placement
    Butler, J
    Howser, R
    Portner, PM
    Pierson, RN
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2005, 11 (07) : 510 - 515
  • [48] Outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with left ventricular assist device
    McElderry, Brenna
    Alvarez, Paulino
    Hanna, Mazen
    Chaudhury, Pulkit
    Bhat, Pavan
    Starling, Randall C.
    Desai, Milind
    Mentias, Amgad
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (07): : 914 - 918
  • [49] Incidence and Outcomes of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Deshmukh, Amrish
    Bhatia, Ankit
    Anyanwu, Emeka
    Ota, Takeyoshi
    Jeevanandam, Valluvan
    Uriel, Nir
    Tung, Roderick
    Ozcan, Cevher
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2018, 64 (05) : 581 - 585
  • [50] Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With a Ventricular Assist Device A Systematic Review of Procedural Characteristics and Outcomes
    Anderson, Robert D.
    Lee, Geoffrey
    Virk, Sohaib
    Bennett, Richard G.
    Hayward, Christopher S.
    Muthiah, Kavitha
    Kalman, Jonathan
    Kumar, Saurabh
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 5 (01) : 39 - 51