Association between psychosocial factors and left ventricular assist device implant outcomes: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Joy J. [1 ]
Bhasin, Shreya [1 ]
Levstik, Johannes [1 ]
Walsh, Patrick [1 ]
Oldham, Mark A. [1 ]
Lee, Hochang Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, 300 Crittenden Blvd,Box PSYCH, Rochester, NY 14625 USA
关键词
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD); Transplant psychiatry; psychosocial assessment; Risk factors; Predictor; Outcome; TRANSPLANTATION; NONADHERENCE; MEDICATION; SUPPORT; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.007
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Psychosocial assessment is a core component of the multidisciplinary evaluation for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The degree to which psychosocial conditions are considered a contraindication to LVAD implantation continues to be debated. This systematic review examines modifiable psychosocial factors as predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search resulted in 2509 articles. After deduplication, abstract and full- text review, 20 relevant articles were identified. Results: Included studies evaluated socioeconomic status (n n = 6), caregiver characteristics (n n = 6), non-adherence (n n = 6), substance use (n n = 13), and psychiatric disorder (n n = 8). The most commonly measured outcomes were all-cause death, readmission rate, and adverse events. Studies varied widely in definition of each psychosocial factor and selected outcomes. No psychosocial factor was consistently associated with a specific outcome in all studies. Socioeconomic status was generally not associated with outcomes. Non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were associated with higher risks of mortality, adverse events, and/or readmission. Findings on caregiver characteristics were mixed. Conclusion: Of the psychosocial factors studied, non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were the most consistently associated with an increased risk of mortality, readmission, and/or adverse events. Heterogeneity in research methodology and study quality across studies precludes firm conclusions regarding the impact of psychosocial factors on long-term patient outcomes. The results of this review reveal a need for adequately powered studies that use uniform definitions of psychosocial factors to clarify relationships between these factors and outcomes after LVAD implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 140
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation in hypercoagulable patients
    Dufendach, Keith A.
    Seese, Laura
    Stearns, Blaise
    Hickey, Gavin
    Mathier, Michael
    Keebler, Mary
    Chen, Shangzhen
    Sciortino, Christopher M.
    Thoma, Floyd W.
    Kilic, Arman
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (09) : 2201 - 2207
  • [22] The Association Between Pulmonary Vascular Resistance and Posttransplant Outcomes Differs by Left Ventricular Assist Device Status
    Gulati, Gaurav
    Tsoi, Melissa R.
    Upshaw, Jenica N.
    Vest, Amanda R.
    Denofrio, David
    Kiernan, Michael S.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2025, 71 (03) : 222 - 228
  • [23] Psychosocial outcomes in pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices and their families: A systematic review
    Rea, Kelly E.
    McCormick, Amanda M.
    Lim, Heang M.
    Cousino, Melissa K.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 25 (04)
  • [24] Psychosocial issues in ventricular assist device implantation and management
    Petty, Michael
    Bauman, Lillian
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2181 - 2187
  • [25] Outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review
    Alamouti-Fard, Emad
    Garg, Pankaj
    Yazji, John
    Brigham, Tara
    Jacob, Samuel
    Wadiwala, Ishaq J.
    Pham, Si M.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [26] Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Hypertrophic and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review
    Sreenivasan, Jayakumar
    Kaul, Risheek
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Ranka, Sagar
    Demmer, Ryan T.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Aronow, Wilbert S.
    Warraich, Haider J.
    Pan, Stephen
    Panza, Julio A.
    Cooper, Howard A.
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2021, 67 (03) : 239 - 244
  • [27] Left ventricular assist device exchange: a review of indications, operative procedure, and outcomes
    Lucertini, Giovanni
    Rogers, Michael Paul
    Italiano, Enrico Giuseppe
    Tarzia, Vincenzo
    Pradegan, Nicola
    Gallo, Michele
    Gerosa, Gino
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 39 (SUPPL 1) : 143 - 153
  • [28] Alarms and Their Outcomes in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
    Lim, Zi Z.
    Robson, Desiree
    Muthiah, Kavitha
    Jansz, Paul
    Macdonald, Peter S.
    Hayward, Christopher S.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2021, 67 (12) : 1284 - 1293
  • [29] Outcomes following left ventricular assist device exchange
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    Narang, Nikhil
    Rodgers, Daniel
    Nguyen, Ann
    Ota, Takeyoshi
    Song, Tae
    Kim, Gene
    Raikhelkar, Jayant
    Jeevanandam, Valluvan
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Uriel, Nir
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (03) : 591 - 597
  • [30] Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes for Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Alsara, Osama
    Reeves, Ronald K.
    Pyfferoen, Mary D.
    Trenary, Tamra L.
    Engen, Deborah J.
    Vitse, Merri L.
    Kessler, Stacy M.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    Clavell, Alfredo L.
    Thomas, Randal J.
    Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
    Park, Soon J.
    Perez-Terzic, Carmen M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2014, 93 (10) : 860 - 868