Association between psychosocial factors and left ventricular assist device implant outcomes: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Joy J. [1 ]
Bhasin, Shreya [1 ]
Levstik, Johannes [1 ]
Walsh, Patrick [1 ]
Oldham, Mark A. [1 ]
Lee, Hochang Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, 300 Crittenden Blvd,Box PSYCH, Rochester, NY 14625 USA
关键词
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD); Transplant psychiatry; psychosocial assessment; Risk factors; Predictor; Outcome; TRANSPLANTATION; NONADHERENCE; MEDICATION; SUPPORT; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.007
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Psychosocial assessment is a core component of the multidisciplinary evaluation for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The degree to which psychosocial conditions are considered a contraindication to LVAD implantation continues to be debated. This systematic review examines modifiable psychosocial factors as predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search resulted in 2509 articles. After deduplication, abstract and full- text review, 20 relevant articles were identified. Results: Included studies evaluated socioeconomic status (n n = 6), caregiver characteristics (n n = 6), non-adherence (n n = 6), substance use (n n = 13), and psychiatric disorder (n n = 8). The most commonly measured outcomes were all-cause death, readmission rate, and adverse events. Studies varied widely in definition of each psychosocial factor and selected outcomes. No psychosocial factor was consistently associated with a specific outcome in all studies. Socioeconomic status was generally not associated with outcomes. Non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were associated with higher risks of mortality, adverse events, and/or readmission. Findings on caregiver characteristics were mixed. Conclusion: Of the psychosocial factors studied, non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were the most consistently associated with an increased risk of mortality, readmission, and/or adverse events. Heterogeneity in research methodology and study quality across studies precludes firm conclusions regarding the impact of psychosocial factors on long-term patient outcomes. The results of this review reveal a need for adequately powered studies that use uniform definitions of psychosocial factors to clarify relationships between these factors and outcomes after LVAD implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 140
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influencing factors on left ventricular assist device adaptation: A systematic review
    Rhoades, Brittany D.
    Beauchamp, Jennifer E. Sanner
    Engebretson, Joan C.
    Wardell, Diane Wind
    HEART & LUNG, 2020, 49 (05): : 501 - 511
  • [2] Psychosocial Risk and Its Association With Outcomes in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
    DeFilippis, Ersilia M.
    Breathett, Khadijah
    Donald, Elena M.
    Nakagawa, Shunichi
    Takeda, Koji
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Truby, Lauren K.
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Uriel, Nir
    Farr, Maryjane A.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (09) : E006910
  • [3] Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device in End-Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review
    Lakhdar, Sofia
    Nassar, Mahmoud
    Buttar, Chandan
    Perez, Laura M. Guzman
    Akbar, Shahzad
    Zafar, Anoosh
    Munira, Most
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [4] Outcomes Associated with Obesity in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Memon, Muhammad Mustafa
    Usman, Muhammad Shariq
    Yamani, Naser
    Garan, A. Reshad
    Demmer, Ryan T.
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (04) : 401 - 408
  • [5] Management and outcomes of left ventricular assist device-associated endocarditis: a systematic review
    Patel, Sinai
    Rizvi, Syed Saif Abbas
    Choi, Jae Hwan
    Horan, Dylan P.
    Weber, Matthew P.
    Maynes, Elizabeth J.
    Luc, Jessica G. Y.
    Aburjania, Nana
    Entwistle, John W.
    Morris, Rohinton J.
    Massey, Howard T.
    Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 8 (06) : 600 - 609
  • [6] Do Psychosocial Factors Have Any Impact on Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?
    Lundgren, Scott
    Lowes, Brian D.
    Zolty, Ronald
    Burdorf, Adam
    Raichlin, Eugenia
    Um, John Y.
    Poon, Cecilia
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2018, 64 (04) : E43 - E47
  • [7] Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates
    Olt, Caroline K.
    Thuita, Lucy W.
    Soltesz, Edward G.
    Tong, Michael Z.
    Weiss, Aaron J.
    Kendall, Kay
    Estep, Jerry D.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Hsich, Eileen M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (03) : 1111 - +
  • [8] Trends and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
    Varshney, Anubodh S.
    DeFilippis, Ersilia M.
    Cowger, Jennifer A.
    Netuka, Ivan
    Pinney, Sean P.
    Givertz, Michael M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (11) : 1092 - 1107
  • [9] Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes
    Smith, LaVone A.
    Yarboro, Leora T.
    Kennedy, Jamie L. W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2088 - 2096
  • [10] The Impact of Obesity on Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes
    Zhigalov, Konstantin
    Sa, Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira
    Arjomandi Rad, Arian
    Vardanyan, Robert
    Goerdt, Lukas
    Chrosch, Thomas
    Zubarevich, Alina
    Wendt, Daniel
    Pizanis, Nikolaus
    Koch, Achim
    Kamler, Markus
    Berger, Rafal
    Schmack, Bastian
    Ruhparwar, Arjang
    Popov, Aron-Frederik
    Weymann, Alexander
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (11): : 1 - 10