How much you talk matters: cheap talk and collusion in a Bertrand oligopoly game

被引:0
作者
Lee, Jun Yeong [1 ]
Hoffman, Elizabeth [2 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Econ, Busan, South Korea
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Econ, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
Bertrand competition; Experiments; Collusion; Cheap talk; Amazon MTurk; SOCIAL COSTS; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATION; CONSPIRACY; ORGANIZATION; COMPETITION; RESTRAINT; MONOPOLY; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1007/s11238-024-10001-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of cheap talk on price and participant profits using a repeated Bertrand oligopoly experiment. During the first 10 rounds, participants are not allowed to communicate with each other. Twenty additional rounds are then played in which the participants can text with one another using an instant message system. Some groups are allowed to text before every round, some before every other round, some every third round, some every fourth round, and others only every fifth round. On average, when texting is allowed, groups attempt to collude to raise the price after being allowed to text. In summary, success in collusion with cheap talk is correlated with a combination of how often participants can text, the subject of their texts, and whether participants actually text when they can.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 297
页数:21
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Andersson O., 2013, GAMES, V4, P497, DOI [10.3390/g4030497, DOI 10.3390/G4030497]
[2]   Do antitrust laws facilitate collusion?: Experimental evidence on costly communication in duopolies [J].
Andersson, Ola ;
Wengstroem, Erik .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 109 (02) :321-339
[3]   Credible communication and cooperation: Experimental evidence from multi-stage Games [J].
Andersson, Ola ;
Wengstrom, Erik .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 81 (01) :207-219
[4]   THE SOCIAL-ORGANIZATION OF CONSPIRACY - ILLEGAL NETWORKS IN THE HEAVY ELECTRICAL-EQUIPMENT INDUSTRY [J].
BAKER, WE ;
FAULKNER, RR .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 58 (06) :837-860
[5]   Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analytic Review [J].
Balliet, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2010, 54 (01) :39-57
[6]  
Belleflamme P., 2015, Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies, Vsecond
[7]   fines, leniency, and rewards in antitrust [J].
Bigoni, Maria ;
Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof ;
Le Coq, Chloe ;
Spagnolo, Giancarlo .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 43 (02) :368-390
[8]   THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS ON SPATIAL COMPETITION [J].
BROWNKRUSE, J ;
CRONSHAW, MB ;
SCHENK, DJ .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1993, 31 (01) :139-165
[9]  
Cason TN., 1995, INFORMATION EC POLIC, V7, P183, DOI [10.1016/0167-6245(94)00041-4, DOI 10.1016/0167-6245(94)00041-4]
[10]   Socially Mediated Internet Surveys: Recruiting Participants for Online Experiments [J].
Cassese, Erin C. ;
Huddy, Leonie ;
Hartman, Todd K. ;
Mason, Lilliana ;
Weber, Christopher R. .
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2013, 46 (04) :775-784