Examining the Validity and Factor Structure of the ICD-11 Trait Domains

被引:2
作者
Brown, Tiffany A. [1 ]
Sellbom, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, POB 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
关键词
International Classification of Diseases; 11th Edition; personality disorder; dimensional; personality traits; PERSONALITY-DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; 5-FACTOR MODEL; SELF; VALIDATION; INVENTORY; CRITERION; PATHOLOGY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1037/pas0001308
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11) includes a new personality disorder (PD) severity diagnosis that may be further characterized using up to five trait domain specifiers. Most of the previous studies have investigated the ICD-11 trait domains using self-report measures. The present study aimed to validate ICD-11 PD trait domains using a multimethod design in a community mental health sample (n = 336). We conducted two confirmatory factor analyses to examine the factor structure of the ICD-11 PD trait model, utilizing clinician-rating, self-report, and informant-report measures. Finally, we examined associations between clinician-rated, self-reported, and informant-reported ICD-11 trait domains with external criteria, specifically traditional PD symptoms and the five-factor model of normal personality. All clinician-rated, self-reported, and informant-reported domain scores loaded meaningfully on their expected factors when controlling for nontrivial method factors. Generally, the trait domains exhibited meaningful associations with conceptually relevant external criteria, although the anankastia domain exhibited more variability in its pattern of correlations across methods. Overall, the ICD-11 trait domain model shows promising reliability and validity, indicating good progress within the field of PD assessment toward a more useful PD operationalization. The International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition, has a new diagnostic system for personality disorder, which includes dimensional personality traits. Further validation of this system is necessary to ensure that it works well in practice. The present study provides support for validity of the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition personality trait model.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 322
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] As others see us - Clinical and research implications of cross-informant correlations for psychopathology
    Achenbach, Thomas M.
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (02) : 94 - 98
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, V5th ed., DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
  • [3] Assessing ICD-11 personality trait domain qualifiers with the MMPI-2-RF
    Anderson, Jaime L.
    Sellbom, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 77 (04) : 1090 - 1105
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, DSM-5 Clinicians Personality Trait Rating Form.
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1994, The Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire
  • [6] Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems
    Bach, B.
    Sellbom, M.
    Kongerslev, M.
    Simonsen, E.
    Krueger, R. F.
    Mulder, R.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 136 (01) : 108 - 117
  • [7] Structure of Clinician-Reported ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Qualifiers
    Bach, Bo
    Christensen, Sune
    Kongerslev, Mickey T.
    Sellbom, Martin
    Simonsen, Erik
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2020, 32 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [8] ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground
    Bach, Bo
    Sellbom, Martin
    Skjernov, Mathias
    Simonsen, Erik
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 52 (05) : 425 - 434
  • [9] Evaluating the Measurement Invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Black Americans and White Americans
    Bagby, R. Michael
    Keeley, Jared W.
    Williams, Charmaine C.
    Mortezaei, Ardeshir
    Ryder, Andrew G.
    Sellbom, Martin
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (01) : 82 - 90
  • [10] Ben-Porath Y.S., 2020, MMPI-3 (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3): Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation