A meta-analysis of livestock brucellosis prevalence in Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Ridlo, Muhammad Rosyid [1 ]
Andityas, Morsid [1 ]
Primatika, Roza Azizah [2 ]
Widantara, Handang [3 ]
Loong, Shih Keng [4 ]
Nuraini, Dian Meididewi [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Vocat Coll, Dept Bioresources Technol & Vet, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Gadjah Mada, Dept Vet Publ Hlth, Fac Vet Med, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[3] Natl Res & Innovat Agcy, Res Ctr Fishery, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Univ Malaya, Higher Inst Ctr Excellence, Trop Infect Dis Res & Educ Ctr, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[5] Univ Sebelas Maret, Fac Anim Sci, Dept Anim Sci, Surakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Brucellosis; Indonesia; meta-analysis; pig; ruminant; DAIRY-CATTLE;
D O I
10.1080/01652176.2024.2390945
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Indonesia has a long history of livestock brucellosis, but the overall pooled prevalence remains unclear. This study aims to determine the pooled estimated prevalence of livestock brucellosis in Indonesia using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were searched and screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from included studies were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model in R 4.3.0 for pooled estimated prevalence, subgroup meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Publication bias and sensitivity tests were conducted using Egger's test, funnel plot, trim and fill plot, and leave-one-out. The screening process identified 46 included studies, representing 47,057 samples for brucellosis testing. The pooled estimated prevalence for livestock brucellosis was 3.25% (95% CI, 1.81%-5.78%) with high heterogeneity (Q = 2130.91, p = 0, I-2=98%). Subgroup meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in the prevalence of livestock brucellosis across the main islands in Indonesia (p = 0.44) and across provinces in Sulawesi Island (p = 0.83), but significant differences were found among provinces in Java (p < 0.01). The subgroup meta-analysis based on animal type showed no significant difference between cattle, small ruminants, and pig brucellosis estimated prevalence (p = 0.26). Between serological tests, no significant difference was found (p = 0.77). Meta-regression showed no significant difference in brucellosis prevalence from 1988-2023. Egger's test and funnel plot showed publication bias. Trim and fill test indicated 21 studies should be added. As most studies were conducted in Java and Sulawesi Islands, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results, emphasizing the necessity of increasing the study of brucellosis in other regions.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Seroprevalence of brucellosis in livestock in Iran: a meta-analysis [J].
Adabi M. ;
Gharekhani J. ;
Saadatmand A. ;
Shahbazi F. .
Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2024, 33 (1) :175-182
[2]   Mapping of Reproduction Disorders Caused by Infectious Diseases in Bali Cattle (Bos sundaicus) in Muna Regency, Indonesia [J].
Aku, Achmad S. ;
Yaddi, Yamin ;
Saili, Takdir ;
Hafid, Harapin ;
Munadi, La Ode M. ;
Dewi, Fitria ;
Kete, Surya C. R. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2023, 57 (02) :241-244
[3]  
Amaliah F., 2023, Indonesia, V3, P27
[4]  
Amna L., 2019, Bul Inov Tek Perta., V1, P53
[5]  
Anis S., 2019, Bul Diag Vet, V18, P9
[6]   Bovine brucellosis trends in Malaysia between 2000 and 2008 [J].
Anka, Mukhtar S. ;
Hassan, Latiffah ;
Adzhar, Azri ;
Khairani-Bejo, Siti ;
Bin Mohamad, Ramlan ;
Zainal, Mohamed A. .
BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2013, 9
[7]  
Antoniou SE., 2019, Efsa J, V17, P133
[8]  
Aritayanthi NPN., 2023, Bulvet, V5, P991, DOI [10.24843/bulvet.2023.v15.i05.p36, DOI 10.24843/BULVET.2023.V15.I05.P36]
[9]  
Azzahrawani N., 2018, P 20 FAVA 15 KIVNAS, P390
[10]  
Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia, 2022, Populasi ternak menurut provinsi dan jenis ternak (ekor), 2022