Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation: Is There an Association Between Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Imaging Features and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer?

被引:1
作者
Cheng, Beatrice Wing -Tung [1 ]
Ko, Tsz Yan [1 ]
Lai, Yee Tak Alta [1 ]
机构
[1] Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced mammogram; basal-like; her2; luminal; breast cancer subtypes; radiologic-pathologic correlation; breast cancer; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MRI; CLASSIFICATION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.64791
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to assess the correlation between imaging features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Methods: This is a retrospective single-institution study of patients who underwent CEM from December 2019 to August 2023. Each patient had at least one histologically proven invasive breast cancer with a core biopsy performed. Patients with a history of breast cancer treatment and lesions not entirely included in the CEM images were excluded. The images were interpreted using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) lexicon for CEM, published in 2022. Different imaging features, including the presence of calcifications, architectural distortion, non-mass enhancement, mass morphology, internal enhancement pattern, the extent of enhancement, and lesion conspicuity, were analyzed. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous variables, including luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and basal-like. The association between the imaging features and molecular subtypes was analyzed with a Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was assumed when the p-value was <0.05. Results: A total of 31 patients with 36 malignant lesions were included in this study. Sixteen lesions (44.4%) were luminal A, four lesions (11.1%) were luminal B, 10 lesions (27.8%) were HER2, and six (16.7%) were basal-like subtypes. The presence of calcifications was associated with the HER2 subtype (p=0.024). Rimenhancement on recombined images was associated with a basal-like subtype (p=0.001). Heterogeneous enhancement on recombined images was associated with non-basal-like breast cancer (p=0.027). No statistically significant correlation was found between other analyzed CEM imaging features and molecular subtypes. Conclusion: CEM imaging features, including the presence of calcifications and certain internal enhancement patterns, were correlated with distinguishing breast cancer molecular subtypes and thus may further expand the role of CEM.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Correlation between MR imaging - prognosis factors and molecular classification of breast cancers [J].
Alili, C. ;
Pages, E. ;
Doyon, F. Curros ;
Perrochia, H. ;
Millet, I. ;
Taourel, P. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (02) :235-242
[2]   Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results [J].
Dromain, Clarisse ;
Thibault, Fabienne ;
Muller, Serge ;
Rimareix, Francoise ;
Delaloge, Suzette ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Balleyguier, Corinne .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (03) :565-574
[3]   Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM) [J].
Francescone, Mark A. ;
Jochelson, Maxine S. ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Sung, Janice S. ;
Hughes, Mary C. ;
Zheng, Junting ;
Moskowitz, Chaya ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (08) :1350-1355
[4]   Radiologic-pathologic correlation in breast cancer: do MRI biomarkers correlate with pathologic features and molecular subtypes? [J].
Galati, Francesca ;
Rizzo, Veronica ;
Moffa, Giuliana ;
Caramanico, Claudia ;
Kripa, Endi ;
Cerbelli, Bruna ;
D'Amati, Giulia ;
Pediconi, Federica .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2022, 6 (01)
[5]   Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 [J].
Goldhirsch, A. ;
Winer, E. P. ;
Coates, A. S. ;
Gelber, R. D. ;
Piccart-Gebhart, M. ;
Thuerlimann, B. ;
Senn, H. -J. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (09) :2206-2223
[6]   Can Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype Help to Select Patients for Preoperative MR Imaging? [J].
Grimm, Lars J. ;
Johnson, Karen S. ;
Marcom, P. Kelly ;
Baker, Jay A. ;
Soo, Mary S. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (02) :352-358
[7]  
Hammond MEH, 2010, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V134, P907, DOI [10.1043/1543-2165-134.7.e48, 10.5858/134.6.907, 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529, 10.1200/JOP.777003]
[8]   Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): Patient preferences and tolerance [J].
Hobbs, Max M. ;
Taylor, Donna B. ;
Buzynski, Sebastian ;
Peake, Rachel E. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 59 (03) :300-305
[9]   Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art [J].
Jochelson, Maxine S. ;
Lobbes, Marc B., I .
RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (01) :36-48
[10]   Bilateral Contrast-enhanced Dual-Energy Digital Mammography: Feasibility and Comparison with Conventional Digital Mammography and MR Imaging in Women with Known Breast Carcinoma [J].
Jochelson, Maxine S. ;
Dershaw, D. David ;
Sung, Janice S. ;
Heerdt, Alexandra S. ;
Thornton, Cynthia ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Ferrara, Jessica ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (03) :743-751