Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes among subsequent twin pregnancies: a nationwide population-based study

被引:2
作者
Ye, Shaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Xuqiong [3 ]
Fan, Dazhi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Gengdong [1 ,2 ]
Li, Pengsheng [1 ,2 ]
Rao, Jiaming [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Zixing [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Xiaoling [2 ]
Liu, Zhengping [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Dongxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp Foshan, Foshan Inst Fetal Med, Foshan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp Foshan, Dept Obstet, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Hosp Huadu Dist, Med Adm Div, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
infant mortality; interpregnancy interval; neonatal morbidity; preterm birth; small for gestational age; twins; BIRTH; MORBIDITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101439
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The existing evidence on the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and pregnancy outcomes primarily focuses on singleton pregnancies, with limited research on twin pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between IPI and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based, retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the National Center for Health Statistics in the United States between 2016 and 2020. We included multiparous women aged 18 to 45 years with live-born twins without congenital anomalies, born between 26 and 42 weeks of gestation. Poisson regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used to evaluate the associations between IPI and adverse outcomes, including preterm birth (PTB) <36 weeks, small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal composite morbidity, and infant death. Missing data on covariates were managed using multiple imputations. Dose-response analyses were performed using the restricted cubic splines (RCS) approach. Subgroup analyses were stratified by maternal age, parity, and combination of neonatal sex. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complete data and excluding pregnancies with intervening events during the IPI. RESULTS: A total of 143,014 twin pregnancies were included in the analysis. Compared to the referent group (IPI of 18-23 months), an IPI of less than 6 months was associated with an increased risk of PTB<36 weeks (RR, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.17-1.25), SGA (RR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.03-1.18), neonatal composite morbidity (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.12-1.27), NICU admission (RR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.14-1.22), and infant death (RR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.05-1.60). An IPI of 5 years or more was associated with an increased risk of PTB<36 weeks (RR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.15-1.21), SGA (RR, 1.24; 95% CI: 1.18-1.30), neonatal composite morbidity (RR, 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), and NICU admission (RR, 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.17). The dose-response analyses showed that these outcomes had U-shaped or J-shaped associations with IPI. The associations between IPI and the outcomes slightly differed by advanced maternal age, parity, and combination of neonatal sex. The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results to the main findings. CONCLUSION: Extreme IPI, less than 6 months or more than 5 years, was associated with adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies. IPI could be used as a predictor for risk stratification in high-risk twin pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Obstet Gynecol, V127, P1192, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001481
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2024, National Vital Statistics System, Mortality 2018-2022 on CDC WONDER Online Database
[3]   Neonatal and maternal outcomes among twin pregnancies stratified by mode of conception in the United States [J].
Arian, Sara E. ;
Erfani, Hadi ;
Yadav, Ghanshyam S. ;
Clark, Steven ;
Gibbons, William E. ;
Shamshirsaz, Alireza A. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (02) :514-521
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics, Birth cohort linked birth infant death data files. User guide to the 2021 period/2020 cohort linked birth/infant death public use file
[5]   Association of interpregnancy interval and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in woman by different previous gestational ages [J].
Chen, Peiran ;
Mu, Yi ;
Liu, Zheng ;
Wang, Yanping ;
Li, Xiaohong ;
Dai, Li ;
Li, Qi ;
Li, Mingrong ;
Xie, Yanxia ;
Liang, Juan ;
Zhu, Jun .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 137 (01) :87-96
[6]   Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cheong-See, Fiona ;
Schuit, Ewoud ;
Arroyo-Manzano, David ;
Khalil, Asma ;
Barrett, Jon ;
Joseph, K. S. ;
Asztalos, Elizabeth ;
Hack, Karien ;
Lewi, Liesbeth ;
Lim, Arianne ;
Liem, Sophie ;
Norman, Jane E. ;
Morrison, John ;
Combs, C. Andrew ;
Garite, Thomas J. ;
Maurel, Kimberly ;
Serra, Vicente ;
Perales, Alfredo ;
Rode, Line ;
Worda, Katharina ;
Nassar, Anwar ;
Aboulghar, Mona ;
Rouse, Dwight ;
Thom, Elizabeth ;
Breathnach, Fionnuala ;
Nakayama, Soichiro ;
Russo, Francesca Maria ;
Robinson, Julian N. ;
Dodd, Jodie M. ;
Newman, Roger B. ;
Bhattacharya, Sohinee ;
Tang, Selphee ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Zamora, Javier ;
Thilaganathan, Basky ;
Thangaratinam, Shakila .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
[7]   Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes - A meta-analysis [J].
Conde-Agudelo, A ;
Rosas-Bermúdez, A ;
Kafury-Goeta, AC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (15) :1809-1823
[8]   Effects of Birth Spacing on Maternal, Perinatal, Infant, and Child Health: A Systematic Review of Causal Mechanisms [J].
Conde-Agudelo, Agustin ;
Rosas-Bermudez, Anyeli ;
Castano, Fabio ;
Norton, Maureen H. .
STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 2012, 43 (02) :93-114
[9]   The Impact of Computing Interpregnancy Intervals Without Accounting for Intervening Pregnancy Events [J].
Conzuelo-Rodriguez, Gabriel ;
Naimi, Ashley I. .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (02) :141-148
[10]   Influence of interpregnancy interval on neonatal morbidity [J].
DeFranco, Emily A. ;
Seske, Laura M. ;
Greenberg, James M. ;
Muglia, Louis J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) :386.e1-386.e9