Negotiation in group interaction: Longitudinal evidence from Chinese postgraduate EFL learners

被引:2
作者
Xu, Jinfen [1 ]
Shu, Jing [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] South Cent Minzu Univ, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
negotiation of content; negotiation of form; negotiation of procedure; negotiation of meaning; peer interaction; CLASSROOM; CHILD; PATTERNS; TALK; CLIL;
D O I
10.1177/13621688241269177
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Negotiation serves to solve communication problems in second language (L2) learners' peer interaction including negotiation of meaning (NoM), negotiation of form (NoF), negotiation of content (NoC) and negotiation of procedure (NoP). The four negotiation types are initiated through negotiation strategies. This study examined how negotiation types and negotiation strategies were distributed and how the distributions developed. The data came from five rounds of group interaction conducted by 52 Chinese postgraduate students in a semester. The findings reveal significant differences in the distributions of negotiation types and negotiation strategies. NoC occurred significantly more frequently than NoM and NoF. Each negotiation type had its major negotiation strategies and they had significantly higher percentages than the other negotiation strategies. Specifically, NoM was mostly initiated by clarification requests, NoF by recasts, NoC by explicit appeals for assistance, and NoP by direct negotiations. Both competitive and supportive growths occurred in the longitudinal trajectories. This study provides a comprehensive and developmental insight into negotiation in EFL learners' peer interaction and offers significant pedagogical implications.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Differences in the task-supported negotiations of younger and older EFL children: From repair into prevention [J].
Angeles Hidalgo, Maria .
IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2021, 59 (03) :395-419
[2]   A cross-sectional study on task type and negotiation of meaning in CLIL child-child interaction [J].
Angeles Hidalgo, Maria ;
Azpilicueta-Martinez, Raul .
PORTA LINGUARUM, 2021, (35) :183-204
[3]  
Aubrey S., 2023, System, V115, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.system.2023.103069, DOI 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2023.103069]
[4]   Examining Deductive Versus Guided Instruction From an Interactionist Perspective [J].
Azkarai, Agurtzane ;
Oliver, Rhonda ;
Gil-Berrio, Yohana .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2022, 72 :125-164
[5]   Negotiation of Meaning Strategies in Child EFL Mainstream and CLIL Settings [J].
Azkarai, Agurtzane ;
Imaz Agirre, Ainara .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2016, 50 (04) :844-870
[6]  
Azpilicueta-Martínez R, 2022, VIAL-VIGO INT J APPL, V19, P9
[7]  
Bitchener J., 2004, LANG AWARE, V13, P81, DOI [10.1080/09658410408667088, DOI 10.1080/09658410408667088]
[8]  
Donato R., 1994, VYGOTSKIAN APPROACHE, P33
[9]   The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge [J].
Ellis, R .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2004, 54 (02) :227-275
[10]  
Ellis R., 2003, TASK BASED LANGUAGE