Parity, faultlessness and relativism: A response to Wright and Ferrari

Crispin Wright and Filippo Ferrari have accused relativism of not accounting for 'parity' - the idea that, when we argue over matters of taste, we take our opponents' opinions to be 'as good as ours' from our own committed perspective. In this paper, I show that (i) explaining parity has not been taken to be a desideratum by relativists and thus they cannot be accused of failing to fulfil a promise; (ii) Wright's and Ferrari's reasons for claiming that parity should be a desideratum are unconvincing.