Accessibility of the early care and education supply: Variation within the center-based provider sector

被引:1
作者
Stephens, Christina M. [1 ]
Crosby, Danielle A. [2 ]
Smith, Julia Mendez [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Postdoctoral Res Associate Ctr Adv Study Teaching, 405 Emmet St S, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Human Dev & Family Studies, Greensboro, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Psychol, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
Early care and education; Access; Accessibility; Child care; Center-based ECE; Latent class analysis; LOW-INCOME FAMILIES; LATENT CLASS; MODEL-SELECTION; QUALITY; ACCESS; PREDICTORS; PRESCHOOL; CHOICE; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107846
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Center-based early care and education (ECE) is important for promoting positive early development and supporting families by providing child care so parents can work. However, the center-based supply varies substantially in terms of funding sources, indicators of quality, and services offered; and many families experience a lack of equitable access to providers that meet their needs. Using a nationally representative sample of the centerbased supply from the 2019 National Survey of Early Care and Education, this study examined patterns in the services center-based providers offer that may facilitate or pose barriers to families' access from a multidimensional lens. Two research questions were investigated using latent class analysis: First, are there patterns of provider accessibility within the center-based supply, and second, are there covariates (i.e., funding, community poverty/ urban density, geographic region) that explain patterns of ECE access? Center-based features selected as indicators were informed by a definition of access comprised of multiple dimensions: availability, affordability, supports children's development, and meets parent's needs. Class enumeration suggested that a three-class model provided the best fit, indicating three patterns of program accessibility: providers that were: flexible at cost (25.9%), free but inflexible (29.2%), and somewhat accessible (44.9%). Additional covariate analyses revealed providers were significantly more or less likely to be classified into the latent classes of access according to community and funding characteristics. Notably, programs receiving Head Start and public preschool funding and those in communities with high poverty and urban density were more likely to be assigned to the free but inflexible class. A key component driving ECE utilization is the accessibility of providers, and these findings inform recommendations for future research and policy to better serve the needs of families with young children.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Adams G., 2021, To Make the Child Care System More Equitable, Expand Options for Parents Working Nontraditional Hours
  • [2] Adams G., 2021, Executive Summary: Assessing Child Care Subsidies through an Equity Lens: A Review of Policies and Practices in the Child Care and Development Fund
  • [3] Albrecht DE, 2000, RURAL SOCIOL, V65, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00344.x
  • [4] Allen L, 2018, TRANSFORMING THE FINANCING OF EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION, P1, DOI 10.17226/24984
  • [5] Amadon S., 2022, OPRE Report #2022-291
  • [6] Child care type, access, and quality in rural areas of the United States: a review
    Anderson, Sara
    Mikesell, Megan
    [J]. EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2019, 189 (11) : 1812 - 1826
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2022, Addressing the impact of COVID-19 on the early care and education sector, DOI DOI 10.17226/26463
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, The Economics of the Child Care Supply in the United States
  • [9] Asparouhov T., 2021, Mplus Web Notes, V6, P49
  • [10] Barnett W.S., 2013, The state of preschool 2013: State preschool yearbook