Sustainability assessment for China's intensive dairy farming: Integrating environmental and economic perspectives

被引:4
作者
Xu, Tianshu [1 ]
Zhang, Tianzuo [1 ]
Cheng, Ziyue [1 ]
Li, Ziheng [1 ]
Wang, Shuo [1 ]
Zhou, Xinying [1 ]
Li, Changting [1 ]
Wang, Liyao [1 ]
Li, Mengqing [1 ]
Hong, Jinglan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shandong Key Lab Environm Proc & Hlth, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Climate Change & Hlth Ctr, Publ Hlth Sch, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental-economic sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Intensive dairy farming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; HEAT-STRESS; INTENSIFICATION; IMPACTS; NITROGEN; CATTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Intensive dairy farming (IDF) is crucial for achieving the second Sustainable Development Goal due to its superior milk production efficiency. However, IDF heavily relies on external inputs to increase productivity; this practice simultaneously increases environmental pollution, thereby posing significant challenges to its sustain- ability. This study conducted a comparative analysis of the environmental and economic sustainability of general-IDF, moderate-IDF, high-IDF, and traditional dairy farming (TDF) in China using a comprehensive method that integrates cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Results showed that among the three IDF scenarios, high-IDF had the lowest external costs, and general-IDF had the lowest internal and total costs. Compared with TDF, IDF demonstrated poorer comprehensive environmental and economic performance, attributed to an increase in roughage expenditure ranging from 28.47 % to 116.73 %. In addition, the output value per ton of milk from IDF was $95.61 to $116.12 less than the total costs, implying the unsustainability of IDF from an integrated environmental and economic perspective. The global warming was the largest environmental impact category for dairy farming, contributing approximately 55 % to the total external costs. Feed dominated the environmental and economic burden with the proportion of approximately 50 % and 60 %, respectively. Key measures to achieve sustainability of IDF were to optimize feed production and consumption, with recommendations for improving feed efficiency and using cow manure as fertilizer. Adjusting the structure and layout of IDF in accordance with the social environment can also enhance the productivity and environmental and economic sustainability of IDF in China.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]   IMPACT World plus : a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method [J].
Bulle, Cecile ;
Margni, Manuele ;
Patouillard, Laure ;
Boulay, Anne-Marie ;
Bourgault, Guillaume ;
De Bruille, Vincent ;
Viet Cao ;
Hauschild, Michael ;
Henderson, Andrew ;
Humbert, Sebastien ;
Kashef-Haghighi, Sormeh ;
Kounina, Anna ;
Laurent, Alexis ;
Levasseur, Annie ;
Liard, Gladys ;
Rosenbaum, Ralph K. ;
Roy, Pierre-Olivier ;
Shaked, Shanna ;
Fantke, Peter ;
Jolliet, Olivier .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (09) :1653-1674
[12]   The Milk Supply Chain in Italy's Umbria Region: Environmental and Economic Sustainability [J].
Cecchini, Lucio ;
Torquati, Biancamaria ;
Paffarini, Chiara ;
Barbanera, Marco ;
Foschini, Daniele ;
Chiorri, Massimo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (08)
[13]   Bridging environmental and financial cost of dairy production: A case study of Irish agricultural policy [J].
Chen, Wenhao ;
Holden, Nicholas M. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 615 :597-607
[14]   Life cycle environmental impacts of high and low intensification pasture-based milk production systems: A case study of the Waikato region, New Zealand [J].
Chobtang, Jeerasak ;
Ledgard, Stewart F. ;
McLaren, Sarah J. ;
Donaghy, Daniel J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :664-674
[15]   Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives [J].
Clay, Nathan ;
Garnett, Tara ;
Lorimer, Jamie .
AMBIO, 2020, 49 (01) :35-48
[16]  
Dong H, 2019, Manual of Fecal Pollution Monitoring and Accounting Method and Production and Discharge Coefficient of Livestock and Poultry Industry
[17]  
Duan Y, 2020, The TFP and Comparative Analysis of Cow Breeding Industry in Different Scales and Provinces in China
[18]  
Fan B., 2017, Chinese J. Anim. Sci., V53, P131, DOI [10.19556/j.0258-7033.2017-08-131, DOI 10.19556/J.0258-7033.2017-08-131]
[19]   Precision feed restriction improves feed and milk efficiencies and reduces methane emissions of less efficient lactating Holstein cows without impairing their performance [J].
Fischer, A. ;
Edouard, N. ;
Faverdin, P. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (05) :4408-4422
[20]   New Zealand Dairy Farming: Milking Our Environment for All Its Worth [J].
Foote, Kyleisha J. ;
Joy, Michael K. ;
Death, Russell G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 56 (03) :709-720