Sustainability assessment for China's intensive dairy farming: Integrating environmental and economic perspectives

被引:2
作者
Xu, Tianshu [1 ]
Zhang, Tianzuo [1 ]
Cheng, Ziyue [1 ]
Li, Ziheng [1 ]
Wang, Shuo [1 ]
Zhou, Xinying [1 ]
Li, Changting [1 ]
Wang, Liyao [1 ]
Li, Mengqing [1 ]
Hong, Jinglan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shandong Key Lab Environm Proc & Hlth, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Climate Change & Hlth Ctr, Publ Hlth Sch, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental-economic sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Intensive dairy farming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; HEAT-STRESS; INTENSIFICATION; IMPACTS; NITROGEN; CATTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Intensive dairy farming (IDF) is crucial for achieving the second Sustainable Development Goal due to its superior milk production efficiency. However, IDF heavily relies on external inputs to increase productivity; this practice simultaneously increases environmental pollution, thereby posing significant challenges to its sustain- ability. This study conducted a comparative analysis of the environmental and economic sustainability of general-IDF, moderate-IDF, high-IDF, and traditional dairy farming (TDF) in China using a comprehensive method that integrates cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Results showed that among the three IDF scenarios, high-IDF had the lowest external costs, and general-IDF had the lowest internal and total costs. Compared with TDF, IDF demonstrated poorer comprehensive environmental and economic performance, attributed to an increase in roughage expenditure ranging from 28.47 % to 116.73 %. In addition, the output value per ton of milk from IDF was $95.61 to $116.12 less than the total costs, implying the unsustainability of IDF from an integrated environmental and economic perspective. The global warming was the largest environmental impact category for dairy farming, contributing approximately 55 % to the total external costs. Feed dominated the environmental and economic burden with the proportion of approximately 50 % and 60 %, respectively. Key measures to achieve sustainability of IDF were to optimize feed production and consumption, with recommendations for improving feed efficiency and using cow manure as fertilizer. Adjusting the structure and layout of IDF in accordance with the social environment can also enhance the productivity and environmental and economic sustainability of IDF in China.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Emergy accounting as a support for a strategic planning towards a regional sustainable milk production
    Agostinho, F.
    Oliveira, M. W.
    Pulselli, F. M.
    Almeida, C. M. V. B.
    Giannetti, B. F.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 176
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
  • [3] Sustainable assessment and resource recycling opportunities identification for China's pig industry: Integrating environmental, economic and social perspectives
    Bai, Yueyang
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Ren, Ke
    Jia, Yuke
    Zhou, Xinying
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Tanikawa, Hiroki
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 39 : 425 - 437
  • [4] Water footprint coupled economic impact assessment for maize production in China
    Bai, Yueyang
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Zhai, Yijie
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Zhang, Ruirui
    Ji, Changxing
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 752
  • [5] Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Flows through the Manure Management Chain in China
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Ma, Lin
    Jin, Shuqin
    Ma, Wenqi
    Velthof, Gerard L.
    Oenema, Oene
    Liu, Ling
    Chadwick, David
    Zhang, Fusuo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (24) : 13409 - 13418
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of milk produced in two smallholder dairy systems in the highlands and the coast of Peru
    Bartl, Karin
    Gomez, Carlos A.
    Nemecek, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (13) : 1494 - 1505
  • [7] Environmental impacts of different dairy farming systems in the Po Valley
    Battini, F.
    Agostini, A.
    Tabaglio, V.
    Amaducci, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 91 - 102
  • [8] How can farming intensification affect the environmental impact of milk production?
    Bava, L.
    Sandrucci, A.
    Zucali, M.
    Guerci, M.
    Tamburini, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (07) : 4579 - 4593
  • [9] Life cycle assessments of aquaculture systems: a critical review of reported findings with recommendations for policy and system development
    Bohnes, Florence Alexia
    Hauschild, Michael Zwicky
    Schlundt, Jorgen
    Laurent, Alexis
    [J]. REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2019, 11 (04) : 1061 - 1079
  • [10] The water, land and carbon footprint of conventional and organic dairy systems in the Netherlands and Spain. A case study into the consequences of ecological indicator selection and methodological choices
    Bronts, S.
    Gerbens-Leenes, P. W.
    Guzman-Luna, P.
    [J]. ENERGY NEXUS, 2023, 11