Determination of Propeller-Rudder-Hull Interaction Coefficients in Ship Manoeuvring Prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Kolodziej, Radoslaw [1 ]
Hoffmann, Pawel [1 ]
机构
[1] Maritime Adv Res Ctr CTO, Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Ship manoeuvring model tests; Numerical manoeuvring tests; Ship manoeuvring prediction; MMG standard method; IMO standards for manoeuvring; HYDRODYNAMIC DERIVATIVES;
D O I
10.2478/pomr-2024-0032
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The assessment of ship manoeuvring properties is a crucial part of the process of ship design and is usually first carried out during the model test phase of the project. According to the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), the manoeuvrability of the ship can be assessed on the basis of the standard trial manoeuvres. In order to do this, free running model tests or captive model tests are used, in conjunction with a mathematical model of ship motion; this is considered to be a reliable prediction method. In recent years, numerical-based methods have also been widely used in ship hydrodynamics and constantly improving computing power and more accurate fluid dynamics models have made the simulation of more complex cases possible. The study presented in this paper focuses on the determination of propeller-rudder-hull interaction coefficients based on the Mathematical Modelling Group (MMG) standard method in ship manoeuvring prediction. The identification of the parameters uses both captive model tests and a simplified numerical method, as well as regression formulas. The results of 35 degrees turning and 10 degrees/10 degrees zig-zag manoeuvres, obtained with the use of each prediction method, are then compared. The test case used in the study is the container type cargo ship equipped with a single propeller and rudder. The model scale, for which the referenced model tests were carried out, is equal to 1:25 and a NACA 0020 rudder profile was used. This research highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each presented prediction method and their potential for future improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hull-Propeller-Rudder Interaction of the JBC Ship Model
    Bekhit, Adham S.
    Pacuraru, Florin
    Pacuraru, Sandita
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS ICNAAM 2019, 2020, 2293
  • [2] An experimental and numerical investigation of propeller-rudder-hull interaction in the presence of tip vortex cavitation (TVC)
    Yilmaz, Naz
    Aktas, Batuhan
    Atlar, Mehmet
    Fitzsimmons, Patrick A.
    Felli, Mario
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 216
  • [3] Effects of ship hull and propeller on rudder cavitation
    Naval Surface Warfare Cent, Carderock, United States
    J Ship Res, 3 (172-180):
  • [4] Effects of ship hull and propeller on rudder cavitation
    Shen, YT
    Remmers, KD
    Jiang, CW
    JOURNAL OF SHIP RESEARCH, 1997, 41 (03): : 172 - 180
  • [5] Numerical Study of the Hull-Propeller-Rudder Interaction
    Lungu, Adrian
    Pacuraru, Florin
    NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, 1168 : 693 - 696
  • [6] Investigating Pressure Fluctuations on Marine Vessel Rudders: Numerical Results from Propeller-Rudder-Hull Interactions
    Yuan, Hongtao
    Li, Fugeng
    Yan, Qinghao
    Zhang, Weipeng
    Hu, Jian
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2022, : 284 - 295
  • [7] Numerical estimation of bank-propeller-hull interaction effect on ship manoeuvring using CFD method
    S. Kaidi
    H. Smaoui
    P. Sergent
    Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29 : 154 - 167
  • [8] Numerical estimation of bank-propeller-hull interaction effect on ship manoeuvring using CFD method
    Kaidi, S.
    Smaoui, H.
    Sergent, P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDRODYNAMICS, 2017, 29 (01) : 154 - 167
  • [9] Numerical estimation of bank-propeller-hull interaction effect on ship manoeuvring using CFD method
    S.Kaidi
    H.Smaoui
    P.Sergent
    Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29 (01) : 154 - 167
  • [10] Numerical Calculation of Hydrodynamic Interference Coefficients between Hull, Rudder and Propeller
    Wang, Xiao
    Wu, Ming
    Ying, Rong-Rong
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATION II, PTS 1-3, 2012, 591-593 : 1949 - 1953