Industrial Intelligence and Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence from China's Manufacturing Industry

被引:1
作者
Mi, Tale [1 ]
Li, Tiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Business, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
industrial intelligence; carbon emissions; sustainable development; energy efficiency; manufacturing industry; carbon intensity; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONTRIBUTE; ROBOTS;
D O I
10.3390/su16156573
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study delves into the impact of industrial intelligence on corporate carbon performance using micro-level data from 1072 listed manufacturing companies in China's A-share market from 2012 to 2021. Industrial intelligence, through the integration of advanced technologies such as AI, IoT, and big data analytics applied to industrial robots, significantly improves the corporate carbon performance, measured by the carbon intensity and total emissions. Although the total carbon emissions increase due to the output effect, the efficiency optimization effect of industrial intelligence has a greater impact, reducing carbon intensity and emissions. The reduction effect from increased production efficiency outweighs the increase from the output effect. Heterogeneity tests show significant carbon reduction effects of industrial intelligence in industries with heavy and moderate carbon emissions, but an increase in carbon emissions in industries with light carbon emissions. Regional differences also emerge, with more effective carbon reduction in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta regions compared to the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. These findings highlight the carbon reduction potential of industrial intelligence across different industries and regions, offering valuable insights for targeted environmental policies and corporate strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Global Research on Carbon Emissions: A Scientometric Review [J].
Abeydeera, Lebunu Hewage Udara Willhelm ;
Mesthrige, Jayantha Wadu ;
Samarasinghalage, Tharushi Imalka .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (14)
[2]   Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Restrepo, Pascual .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (06) :2188-2244
[3]   Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study [J].
Andersson, Julius J. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 11 (04) :1-30
[4]   Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation [J].
Autor, David H. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 29 (03) :3-30
[5]   How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? [J].
Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad ;
Roubaud, David ;
Farhani, Sahbi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 113 :356-367
[6]   Relationship between the digital economy, resource allocation and corporate carbon emission intensity: new evidence from listed Chinese companies [J].
Chen, Pengyu .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 4 (07)
[7]   Do Artificial Intelligence Applications Affect Carbon Emission Performance?-Evidence from Panel Data Analysis of Chinese Cities [J].
Chen, Ping ;
Gao, Jiawei ;
Ji, Zheng ;
Liang, Han ;
Peng, Yu .
ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (15)
[8]  
Chen S. Y., 2018, EC RES J, V53, P20, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JEBO.2018.02.004
[9]   The effects of environmental regulation and industrial structure on carbon dioxide emission: a non-linear investigation [J].
Chen, Xia ;
Chen, Yin E. ;
Chang, Chun-Ping .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (29) :30252-30267
[10]  
Chen Y.B., 2019, Econ. Res. J, V7, P47