Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting: how I teach it

被引:1
|
作者
Sutter, Francis P. [1 ]
Wertan, MaryAnn C. [1 ]
Spragan, Danielle [1 ]
Yamashita, Yoshiyuki [2 ]
Sicouri, Serge [2 ]
机构
[1] Main Line Hlth, Lankenau Inst Med Res, Dept Cardiac Surg Res, Wynnewood, PA USA
[2] Lankenau Heart Inst, Dept Cardiac Surg, Lankenau Med Ctr, Main Line Hlth, Wynnewood, PA USA
关键词
degrees Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (robotic-assisted CABG); learning curve; minithoracotomy; coronary revascularization; minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB);
D O I
10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The first robotic cardiac operation was performed more than two decades ago. This paper describes the distinct steps and components necessary for teaching robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (R-MIDCAB). It also provides a general overview of the surgical robotic setup and ways to troubleshoot potential complications. The focus of robotic training is not only on the surgeon but includes an entire dedicated cardiac team and administrative institutional support. This team approach ensures that R-MIDCAB can be performed safely and reproducibly. Meticulous planning, incremental learning, and teamwork are the main factors leading to program success and optimal patient outcomes. Robotic-assisted internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting and coronary revascularization via a small, anterior mini-thoracotomy has provided an alternative to sternotomy in selected patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Benefits include less postoperative atrial fibrillation, fewer blood transfusion, less time in the operating room (OR), less ventilatory support, fewer strokes, decreased intensive care unit stay and shortened postoperative length of stay all of which manifests as a decrease in institutional resource utilization. Recent data show that R-MIDCAB and hybrid coronary revascularization provides good longterm outcomes. In addition to patient satisfaction, there is an additional overall cost benefit to R-MIDCAB over traditional sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), secondary to decreased hospital length of stay. Robotically harvesting the IMA, operating on a beating heart, and performing anastomoses through a small incision all require advanced training and incremental learning. Increased experience generally leads to shortened surgical times and fewer complications.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 353
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: an 18-year single-centre experience
    Giambruno, Vincenzo
    Chu, Michael W.
    Fox, Stephanie
    Swinamer, Stuart A.
    Rayman, Reiza
    Markova, Zarina
    Barnfield, Rebecca
    Cooper, Mitchell
    Boyd, Douglas W.
    Menkis, Alan
    Kiaii, Bob
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2018, 14 (03):
  • [2] Challenges facing totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting
    Moscarelli, Marco
    Harling, Leanne
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Casula, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2015, 11 (01): : 18 - 29
  • [3] Safe implementation of robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: application of learning curves and cumulative sum analysis
    Van den Eynde, Jef
    Bentein, Hannah Vaesen
    Decaluwe, Tom
    De Praetere, Herbert
    Wertan, MaryAnn C.
    Sutter, Francis P.
    Balkhy, Husam H.
    Oosterlinck, Wouter
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (07) : 4260 - 4270
  • [4] Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting
    Melly, Ludovic
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    Lee, Timothy
    Jansens, Jean-Luc
    Puskas, John D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (03) : 1960 - 1967
  • [5] Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting
    Kayatta M.O.
    Halkos M.E.
    Narayan P.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 34 (Suppl 3) : 302 - 309
  • [6] Robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buehler, Anna M.
    Ferri, Cleusa
    Flato, Uri A. P.
    Fernandes, Jefferson G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2015, 11 (02): : 150 - 158
  • [7] Coronary artery bypass grafting for coronary artery anomalies in infants and young children
    Hohri, Yu
    Yamagishi, Masaaki
    Maeda, Yoshinobu
    Asada, Satoshi
    Hongu, Hisayuki
    Numata, Satoshi
    Yaku, Hitoshi
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 35 (02)
  • [8] Renal insufficiency and severe coronary artery disease: should coronary artery bypass grafting, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention be performed?
    Hayatsu, Yukihiro
    Ruel, Marc
    Sun, Louise Y.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (06) : 645 - 649
  • [9] Five Hundred Cases of Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Predictors of Success and Safety
    Bonaros, Nikolaos
    Schachner, Thomas
    Lehr, Eric
    Kofler, Markus
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Hong, Patricia
    Wehman, Brody
    Zimrin, David
    Vesely, Mark K.
    Friedrich, Guy
    Bonatti, Johannes
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 95 (03): : 803 - 812
  • [10] Coronary artery bypass grafting without full sternotomy
    Sasaki, Hideki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2009, 39 (11) : 929 - 937