Enhancing Ovarian Tumor Diagnosis: Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks in Classifying Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound Images

被引:3
|
作者
Giourga, Maria [1 ]
Petropoulos, Ioannis [2 ]
Stavros, Sofoklis [3 ]
Potiris, Anastasios [3 ]
Gerede, Angeliki [4 ]
Sapantzoglou, Ioakeim [1 ]
Fanaki, Maria [1 ]
Papamattheou, Eleni [1 ]
Karasmani, Christina [1 ]
Karampitsakos, Theodoros [3 ]
Topis, Spyridon [3 ]
Zikopoulos, Athanasios [3 ]
Daskalakis, Georgios [1 ]
Domali, Ekaterini [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 1, Athens 11528, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Athens 15772, Greece
[3] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Univ Hosp ATTIKON, Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 3, Athens 12462, Greece
[4] Univ Thrace, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Alexandroupolis 68100, Greece
关键词
ultrasonography; deep learning; ovarian cancer; artificial intelligence; convolutional neural network; diagnosis; ADNEXAL MASSES; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SONOGRAPHIC FEATURES; PELVIC MASSES; CANCER; BENIGN; DISCRIMINATION; RADIOMICS; MODELS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13144123
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: This study aims to create a strong binary classifier and evaluate the performance of pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to effectively distinguish between benign and malignant ovarian tumors from still ultrasound images. Methods: The dataset consisted of 3510 ultrasound images from 585 women with ovarian tumors, 390 benign and 195 malignant, that were classified by experts and verified by histopathology. A 20% to80% split for training and validation was applied within a k-fold cross-validation framework, ensuring comprehensive utilization of the dataset. The final classifier was an aggregate of three pre-trained CNNs (VGG16, ResNet50, and InceptionNet), with experimentation focusing on the aggregation weights and decision threshold probability for the classification of each mass. Results: The aggregate model outperformed all individual models, achieving an average sensitivity of 96.5% and specificity of 88.1% compared to the subjective assessment's (SA) 95.9% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity. All the above results were calculated at a decision threshold probability of 0.2. Notably, misclassifications made by the model were similar to those made by SA. Conclusions: CNNs and AI-assisted image analysis can enhance the diagnosis and aid ultrasonographers with less experience by minimizing errors. Further research is needed to fine-tune CNNs and validate their performance in diverse clinical settings, potentially leading to even higher sensitivity and overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep convolutional neural networks for multiple histologic types of ovarian tumors classification in ultrasound images
    Wu, Meijing
    Cui, Guangxia
    Lv, Shuchang
    Chen, Lijiang
    Tian, Zongmei
    Yang, Min
    Bai, Wenpei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [2] Subjective assessment of ovarian masses using pattern recognition: the impact of experience on diagnostic performance and interobserver variability
    Faschingbauer, Florian
    Benz, Michaela
    Haeberle, Lothar
    Goecke, Tamme W.
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Renner, Stefan
    Mueller, Andreas
    Wittenberg, Thomas
    Muenzenmayer, Christian
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (06) : 1663 - 1669
  • [3] Identifying pregnancy in cows using ovarian ultrasound images and convolutional neural networks-a proof-of-concept study
    Andrade, Andre Cascalho
    da Silva, Luan Oliveira
    Souza, Victor Ferreira
    Rufino, Luana Marta de Almeida
    da Silva, Tadeu Eder
    dos Santos, Adam Dreyton Ferreira
    Gomes, Diego de Azevedo
    Rodrigues, Joao Paulo Pacheco
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 206
  • [4] Ultrasonographic diagnosis of ovarian tumors through the deep convolutional neural network
    Xi, Min
    Zheng, Runan
    Wang, Mingyue
    Shi, Xiu
    Chen, Chaomei
    Qian, Jun
    Gu, Xinxian
    Zhou, Jinhua
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2024, 95 (03) : 181 - 189
  • [5] Ultrasound image analysis using deep neural networks for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors: comparison with expert subjective assessment
    Christiansen, F.
    Epstein, E. L.
    Smedberg, E.
    Akerlund, M.
    Smith, K.
    Epstein, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 57 (01) : 155 - 163
  • [6] Classification of breast masses on ultrasound shear wave elastography using convolutional neural networks
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Katsuta, Leona
    Kubota, Kazunori
    Mori, Mio
    Kikuchi, Yuka
    Kato, Arisa
    Oda, Goshi
    Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi
    Kitazume, Yoshio
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 2020, 42 (4-5) : 213 - 220
  • [7] Automated Detection of Liver Steatosis in Ultrasound Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks
    Mohammad, Umar Farooq
    Almekkawy, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IEEE IUS 2021), 2021,
  • [8] Classifying Brain Tumors on Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Using Convolutional Neural Networks
    Gomez-Guzman, Marco Antonio
    Jimenez-Beristain, Laura
    Garcia-Guerrero, Enrique Efren
    Lopez-Bonilla, Oscar Roberto
    Tamayo-Perez, Ulises Jesus
    Esqueda-Elizondo, Jose Jaime
    Palomino-Vizcaino, Kenia
    Inzunza-Gonzalez, Everardo
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [9] Thyroid nodule recognition using a joint convolutional neural network with information fusion of ultrasound images and radiofrequency data
    Liu, Zhong
    Zhong, Shaobin
    Liu, Qiang
    Xie, Chenxi
    Dai, Yunzhu
    Peng, Chuan
    Chen, Xin
    Zou, Ruhai
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (07) : 5001 - 5011
  • [10] Classifying functional nuclear images with convolutional neural networks: a survey
    Lin, Qiang
    Man, Zhengxing
    Cao, Yongchun
    Deng, Tao
    Han, Chengcheng
    Cao, Chuangui
    Zhang, Linjun
    Zeng, Sitao
    Gao, Ruiting
    Wang, Weilan
    Ji, Jinshui
    Huang, Xiaodi
    IET IMAGE PROCESSING, 2020, 14 (14) : 3300 - 3313