Effect of a correlated competing risk on marginal survival estimation in an accelerated failure time model

被引:1
|
作者
Gares, Valerie [1 ,2 ]
Hudson, Malcolm [2 ,3 ]
Manuguerra, Maurizio [3 ]
Gebski, Val [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, INSA, CNRS, IRMAR UMR 6625, Rennes, France
[2] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Sch Math & Phys Sci, FSE, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Time-to-event analysis; Accelerated failure time; Bivariate normal; Cox model; Competing risks; Dependent censoring; EM algorithm; Ill-conditioning; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; REGRESSION-ANALYSIS; PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD; ALGORITHM; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1080/03610918.2024.2380005
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
In problems with a time to event outcome, subjects may experience competing events, which censor the outcome of interest. Cox's partial likelihood estimator treating competing events as independent censoring is commonly used to examine group differences in clinical trials but fails to adjust for omitted covariates and can bias the assessment of marginal benefit. A bivariate normal linear model generating latent data with dependent censoring is used to assess this bias. Our R-package bnc provides maximum penalized likelihood (MPL) parameter estimation using a novel EM algorithm. Using bnc, we study the properties of such MPL estimation. Simulation results for two-sample survival comparisons of time to an event of interest, with independent censoring accompanied by censoring from a correlated competing risk, are presented. Key parameters-means, hazard ratios, and correlation-are estimated. These results demonstrated that, despite ill-conditioning in models generating correlated competing risks, estimates of marginal effects are reliable. Bivariate normal models were fitted in a trial of head and neck cancer. Model fits help with clinical interpretation while also supplementing other standard methods for follow-up that are terminated by intervening risks.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analyzing Factors Affecting Emergency Department Length of Stay-Using a Competing Risk-accelerated Failure Time Model
    Chaou, Chung-Hsien
    Chiu, Te-Fa
    Yen, Amy Ming-Fang
    Ng, Chip-Jin
    Chen, Hsiu-Hsi
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (14)
  • [42] NONPARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION OF ACCELERATED FAILURE TIME COMPETING RISKS MODELS
    Lee, Sokbae
    Lewbel, Arthur
    ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2013, 29 (05) : 905 - 919
  • [43] An estimation method of marginal treatment effects on correlated longitudinal and survival outcomes
    Pan, Qing
    Yi, Grace Y.
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2011, 4 (04) : 499 - 509
  • [44] ESTIMATION OF THE TIME-DEPENDENT ACCELERATED FAILURE TIME MODEL IN THE PRESENCE OF CONFOUNDING FACTORS
    ROBINS, J
    BIOMETRIKA, 1992, 79 (02) : 321 - 334
  • [45] Role of competing failure model in reliability estimation
    Zhang, Fang
    Cai, Jinyan
    Zhu, Yanhui
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK AND RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 722 - 725
  • [46] Bayesian accelerated failure time model for space-time dependency in a geographically augmented survival model
    Onicescu, Georgiana
    Lawson, Andrew
    Zhang, Jiajia
    Gebregziabher, Mulugeta
    Wallace, Kristin
    Eberth, Jan M.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (05) : 2244 - 2256
  • [47] Estimation of Time-Dependent Association for Bivariate Failure Times in the Presence of a Competing Risk
    Ning, Jing
    Bandeen-Roche, Karen
    BIOMETRICS, 2014, 70 (01) : 10 - 20
  • [48] Generalized F accelerated failure time model for mapping survival trait loci
    Zhou, Xiaojing
    Yan, Li
    Prows, Daniel R.
    Yang, Runqing
    GENOMICS, 2011, 97 (06) : 379 - 385
  • [49] Mediation Analysis for Censored Survival Data Under an Accelerated Failure Time Model
    Fulcher, Isabel R.
    Tchetgen, Eric J. Tchetgen
    Williams, Paige L.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (05) : 660 - 666
  • [50] Robust estimation in accelerated failure time models
    Sinha, Sanjoy K.
    LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2019, 25 (01) : 52 - 78