Systematic review of statistical methods for the identification of buildings and areas with high radon levels

被引:3
作者
Rey, Joan F. [1 ,2 ]
Antignani, Sara [3 ]
Baumann, Sebastian [4 ]
Di Carlo, Christian [3 ]
Loret, Niccolo [3 ]
Greau, Claire [5 ]
Gruber, Valeria [4 ]
Pernot, Joelle Goyette [1 ]
Bochicchio, Francesco [3 ]
机构
[1] HES SO Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Transform Inst, Western Switzerland Ctr Indoor Air Qual & Radon cr, Sch Engn & Architecture Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, Human Oriented Built Environm Lab, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Natl Ctr Radiat Protect & Computat Phys, Italian Natl Inst Hlth, Rome, Italy
[4] Austrian Agcy Hlth & Food Safety, Dept Radon & Radioecol, Linz, Austria
[5] Inst Radioprotect & Surete Nucleaire, Bur Etud & expertise Radon, IRSN, PSE ENV,SERPEN,BERA, Fontenay Aux Roses, France
关键词
radon prone areas and building; public health; statistic; geostatistics; machine learning; INDOOR RADON; PRONE AREAS; QUANTILE REGRESSION; GEOLOGICAL UNITS; MODEL; EXHALATION; URANIUM; REGION;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460295
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Radon is a natural and radioactive noble gas, which may accumulate indoors and cause lung cancers after long term-exposure. Being a decay product of Uranium 238, it originates from the ground and is spatially variable. Many environmental (i.e., geology, tectonic, soils) and architectural factors (i.e., building age, floor) influence its presence indoors, which make it difficult to predict. However, different methods have been developed and applied to identify radon prone areas and buildings. This paper presents the results of a systematic literature review of suitable statistical methods willing to identify buildings and areas where high indoor radon concentrations might be found. The application of these methods is particularly useful to improve the knowledge of the factors most likely to be connected to high radon concentrations. These types of methods are not so commonly used, since generally statistical methods that study factors predictive of radon concentration are focused on the average concentration and aim to identify factors that influence the average radon level. In this paper, an attempt has been made to classify the methods found, to make their description clearer. Four main classes of methods have been identified: descriptive methods, regression methods, geostatistical methods, and machine learning methods. For each presented method, advantages and disadvantages are presented while some applications examples are given. The ultimate purpose of this overview is to provide researchers with a synthesis paper to optimize the selection of the method to identify radon prone areas and buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Trends in Development of Novel Machine Learning Methods for the Identification of Gliomas in Datasets That Include Non-Glioma Images: A Systematic Review
    Subramanian, Harry
    Dey, Rahul
    Brim, Waverly Rose
    Tillmanns, Niklas
    Petersen, Gabriel Cassinelli
    Brackett, Alexandria
    Mahajan, Amit
    Johnson, Michele
    Malhotra, Ajay
    Aboian, Mariam
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [42] Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiological approaches to inform COVID-19 surveillance and control: a systematic review of statistical and modelling methods in Africa
    Odhiambo, Julius Nyerere
    Dolan, Carrie B.
    Troup, Lydia
    Rojas, Nathaly Perez
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [43] Point of care HIV testing in dental settings in high-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Doughty, J.
    Tran, C.
    Santella, A. J.
    Fitzgerald, R.
    Burns, F.
    Porter, Stephen
    Watt, Richard G.
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 52 (05) : 648 - 659
  • [44] Risk factors for violence against women in high-prevalence settings: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-synthesis
    Mannell, Jenevieve
    Lowe, Hattie
    Brown, Laura
    Mukerji, Reshmi
    Devakumar, Delan
    Gram, Lu
    Jansen, Henrica A. F. M.
    Minckas, Nicole
    Osrin, David
    Prost, Audrey
    Shannon, Geordan
    Vyas, Seema
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 7 (03):