Systematic review of statistical methods for the identification of buildings and areas with high radon levels

被引:3
作者
Rey, Joan F. [1 ,2 ]
Antignani, Sara [3 ]
Baumann, Sebastian [4 ]
Di Carlo, Christian [3 ]
Loret, Niccolo [3 ]
Greau, Claire [5 ]
Gruber, Valeria [4 ]
Pernot, Joelle Goyette [1 ]
Bochicchio, Francesco [3 ]
机构
[1] HES SO Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Transform Inst, Western Switzerland Ctr Indoor Air Qual & Radon cr, Sch Engn & Architecture Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, Human Oriented Built Environm Lab, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Natl Ctr Radiat Protect & Computat Phys, Italian Natl Inst Hlth, Rome, Italy
[4] Austrian Agcy Hlth & Food Safety, Dept Radon & Radioecol, Linz, Austria
[5] Inst Radioprotect & Surete Nucleaire, Bur Etud & expertise Radon, IRSN, PSE ENV,SERPEN,BERA, Fontenay Aux Roses, France
关键词
radon prone areas and building; public health; statistic; geostatistics; machine learning; INDOOR RADON; PRONE AREAS; QUANTILE REGRESSION; GEOLOGICAL UNITS; MODEL; EXHALATION; URANIUM; REGION;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460295
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Radon is a natural and radioactive noble gas, which may accumulate indoors and cause lung cancers after long term-exposure. Being a decay product of Uranium 238, it originates from the ground and is spatially variable. Many environmental (i.e., geology, tectonic, soils) and architectural factors (i.e., building age, floor) influence its presence indoors, which make it difficult to predict. However, different methods have been developed and applied to identify radon prone areas and buildings. This paper presents the results of a systematic literature review of suitable statistical methods willing to identify buildings and areas where high indoor radon concentrations might be found. The application of these methods is particularly useful to improve the knowledge of the factors most likely to be connected to high radon concentrations. These types of methods are not so commonly used, since generally statistical methods that study factors predictive of radon concentration are focused on the average concentration and aim to identify factors that influence the average radon level. In this paper, an attempt has been made to classify the methods found, to make their description clearer. Four main classes of methods have been identified: descriptive methods, regression methods, geostatistical methods, and machine learning methods. For each presented method, advantages and disadvantages are presented while some applications examples are given. The ultimate purpose of this overview is to provide researchers with a synthesis paper to optimize the selection of the method to identify radon prone areas and buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employment and inequalities: a systematic review of international evidence and critical appraisal of statistical methods
    Abugamza, A.
    Kaskirbayeva, D.
    Charlwood, A.
    Nikolova, S.
    Martin, A.
    PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024,
  • [32] Systematic review of the identification, assessment, and mitigation of safety risks in high-rise building construction
    Lei, Wei Rui
    Khoiry, Muhamad Azry
    Mutalib, Azrul A.
    GRADEVINAR, 2024, 76 (12): : 1099 - 1114
  • [33] A Systematic Review of the Literature on Machine Learning Methods Applied to High Throughput Phenotyping in Agricultural Production
    Nogueira, Emilia
    Oliveira, Bruna
    Bulcao-Neto, Renato
    Soares, Fabrizzio
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2023, 21 (07) : 783 - 796
  • [34] Bias and Unfairness in Machine Learning Models: A Systematic Review on Datasets, Tools, Fairness Metrics, and Identification and Mitigation Methods
    Pagano, Tiago P.
    Loureiro, Rafael B.
    Lisboa, Fernanda V. N.
    Peixoto, Rodrigo M.
    Guimaraes, Guilherme A. S.
    Cruz, Gustavo O. R.
    Araujo, Maira M.
    Santos, Lucas L.
    Cruz, Marco A. S.
    Oliveira, Ewerton L. S.
    Winkler, Ingrid
    Nascimento, Erick G. S.
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [35] Reporting of Model Performance and Statistical Methods in Studies That Use Machine Learning to Develop Clinical Prediction Models: Protocol for a Systematic Review
    Weaver, Colin George Wyllie
    Basmadjian, Robert B.
    Williamson, Tyler
    McBrien, Kerry
    Sajobi, Tolu
    Boyne, Devon
    Yusuf, Mohamed
    Ronksley, Paul Everett
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (03):
  • [36] Predictive performance of machine learning compared to statistical methods in time-to-event analysis of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review protocol
    Suliman, Abubaker
    Masud, Mohammad
    Serhani, Mohamed Adel
    Abdullahi, Aminu S.
    Oulhaj, Abderrahim
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [37] Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence-Driven Advanced Methods for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Identification and Classification: A Systematic Review
    Rahman, Syed Ijaz Ur
    Abbas, Naveed
    Ali, Sikandar
    Salman, Muhammad
    Alkhayat, Ahmed
    Khan, Jawad
    Hussain, Dildar
    Gu, Yeong Hyeon
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2025, 142 (02): : 1199 - 1231
  • [38] Comparison of machine learning models with conventional statistical methods for prediction of percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sepehr Nayebirad
    Ali Hassanzadeh
    Amir Mohammad Vahdani
    Aida Mohamadi
    Shayan Forghani
    Akbar Shafiee
    Farzad Masoudkabir
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 25 (1)
  • [39] Do machine learning methods improve prediction of ambient air pollutants with high spatial contrast? A systematic review
    Vachon, Julien
    Kerckhoffs, Jules
    Buteau, Stephane
    Smargiassi, Audrey
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 262
  • [40] Machine Learning Approaches for Microorganism Identification, Virulence Assessment, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Evaluation Using DNA Sequencing Methods: A Systematic Review
    Abhadionmhen, Abel Onolunosen
    Asogwa, Caroline Ngozi
    Ezema, Modesta Ero
    Nzeh, Royransom Chiemela
    Ezeora, Nnamdi Johnson
    Abhadiomhen, Stanley Ebhohimhen
    Echezona, Stephenson Chukwukanedu
    Udanor, Collins Nnalue
    MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024,