Normal fault reactivation induced by hydraulic fracturing: Poroelastic effects

Numerous surface-felt earthquakes have been spatiotemporally correlated with hydraulic-fracturing operations. Because large deformations occur close to hydraulic fractures (HFs), any associated fault reactivation and resulting seismicity must be evaluated within the length scale of the fracture stages and based on the precise fault location relative to the simulated rock volumes. To evaluate the changes in Coulomb failure stress (CFS) with injection, we conduct fully coupled poroelastic finite-element simulations using a pore-pressure cohesive zone model for the fracture and fault core in combination with a fault-fracture intersection model. The simulations quantify the dependence of CFS and the fault reactivation potential on the host rock and fault properties, spacing between the fault and the HF, and the fracturing sequence. We find that fracturing in an anisotropic insitu stress state does not lead to fault tensile opening but rather dominant shear reactivation through a poroelastic stress disturbance over the fault core ahead of the compressed central stabilized zone. In our simulations, poroelastic stress changes significantly affect fault reactivation in all the simulated scenarios of fracturing 50-200 m away from an optimally oriented normal fault. Asymmetric HF growth due to the stress shadowing effect of the adjacent HFs leads to (1) a larger reactivated fault zone following the simultaneous and sequential fracturing of multiple clusters compared with single-cluster fracturing and (2) a larger unstable area (CFS > 0.1) over the fault core or a higher potential of the fault slip following sequential fracturing compared with simultaneous fracturing. The fault reactivation area is further increased for a fault with lower conductivity and a higher opening-mode fracture toughness of the overlying layer. To reduce the risk of fault reactivation by hydraulic fracturing under the reservoir characteristics of the Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, it is recommended to (1) conduct simultaneous fracturing instead of sequential and (2) maintain a minimum distance of approximately 200 m for HF operations from known faults.