University Student Surveys Using Chatbots: Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents

被引:7
作者
Abbas, Noorhan [1 ]
Pickard, Thomas [1 ]
Atwell, Eric [1 ]
Walker, Aisha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Comp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Educ, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
来源
LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES: GAMES AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS FOR LEARNING, LCT 2021, PT II | 2021年 / 12785卷
关键词
Chatbot; Conversational agent; Online course evaluation; Pedagogical conversational agents; Student enjoyment;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-77943-6_10
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Predefined web surveys are often used to collect course evaluations from students in higher education institutions. These institutions use the evaluations to adjust their courses' pedagogical standards and lecture style to cope with an increasingly uncertain and complex world. Many limitations to using web surveys have been reported such as low response rates and low-quality responses to open questions. To overcome these limitations, artificial intelligence conversational agents (CAs) or 'chatbots' are used to play the interviewer role, facilitating the enhancement of the quality of responses. This is accomplished by mimicking human-human conversations; by asking questions in a friendly, casual way and pursuing high-quality responses. This study aims to explore the opportunities and the obstacles of using CAs in collecting course evaluations in three European universities (UK, Spain and Croatia) and one Centre of excellence in Cyprus. The transcripts collected have been analyzed using statistical data analysis methods and qualitative data analysis techniques. Our findings reveal that the use of CAs in collecting course feedback from students has a positive impact on response quality and can boost students' enjoyment levels. Furthermore, gender differences and student age have been identified as important factors that can influence the depth of the conversation with the CA.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 169
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 9 EUR QUAL ASS FOR B
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02602930500099193, 10.1080/02602930500099193]
[3]   Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? [J].
Blair, Erik ;
Noel, Keisha Valdez .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (07) :879-894
[4]  
Brustenga G., 2018, Briefing paper: chatbots in education
[5]   Chatbot in a Campus Environment: Design of LiSA, a Virtual Assistant to Help Students in Their University Life [J].
Dibitonto, Massimiliano ;
Leszczynska, Katarzyna ;
Tazzi, Federica ;
Medaglia, Carlo M. .
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: INTERACTION TECHNOLOGIES, HCI INTERNATIONAL 2018, PT III, 2018, 10903 :103-116
[6]  
Fadel C., 2019, Sustainability, Human Well-Being, and the Future of Education, P269, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-78580-6_8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-78580-6_8]
[7]  
Gnewuch U., 2018, P 26 EUR C INF SYST, P143975
[8]   Incorporating android conversational agents in m-learning apps [J].
Griol, David ;
Manuel Molina, Jose ;
Callejas, Zoraida .
EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2017, 34 (04)
[9]  
Hobert S., 2019, 40 INT C INF SYST IC, V1, P1
[10]   Comparing Data from Chatbot and Web Surveys Effects of Platform and Conversational Style on Survey Response Quality [J].
Kim, Soomin ;
Lee, Joonhwan ;
Gweon, Gahgene .
CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,