Comparative economic analysis of urban sanitation interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

被引:1
作者
Ross, Simon John [1 ]
Fane, Simon [1 ]
Foster, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Inst Sustainable Futures, POB 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
cost analysis; cost-effectiveness; economic principles; social equity; sustainability; FECAL SLUDGE MANAGEMENT; WASTE-WATER; OPERATING COSTS; OPTIONS; SUSTAINABILITY; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2166/washdev.2024.313
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
This review assesses evaluative criteria for least-cost economic analyses of citywide inclusive sanitation (CWIS) interventions, focusing on their alignment with the practical needs for decision support in low- and middle-income countries. We examined the literature from 2003 to 2022 that compares the costs and benefits of urban sanitation interventions to analyse their capacity to select cost-efficient and equitable urban sanitation options. The analysis revealed that finer disaggregation of cost perspectives could better articulate the diverse demands for services. Furthermore, options for comparison should be framed in addition to the diverse service provision models already existing within a context to ensure these perspectives are included. Developing the capacity to forecast a context-specific without-project scenario, using locally derived cost data as a basis of comparison, will be essential for adhering to CWIS planning principles. In addition, involving marginalised users more effectively in decision-making processes within economic analyses is essential for advancing equitable service provision. Future comparative economic analysis studies should embrace the complexities of CWIS contexts by supplementing broad-scale comparisons with detailed, context-sensitive evaluations to support more inclusive urban sanitation planning.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 807
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Manual on Low Cost Sanitation Technologies For Ger Areas, Mongolia
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, UN-Water Integr. Monit. Initiat, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000-2020: Five Years into the SDGs
[4]   Life-cycle costs of a resource-oriented sanitation system and implications for advancing a circular economy approach to sanitation [J].
Carrard, Naomi ;
Jayathilake, Nilanthi ;
Willetts, Juliet .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 307 (307)
[5]   Shining the spotlight on household investments for water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH): let us talk about HI and the three 'T's [J].
Danert, Kerstin ;
Hutton, Guy .
JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 10 (01) :1-4
[6]   The cost of urban sanitation solutions: a literature review [J].
Daudey, Loic .
JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 8 (02) :176-195
[7]   How Much Will Safe Sanitation for all Cost? Evidence from Five Cities [J].
Delaire, Caroline ;
Peletz, Rachel ;
Haji, Salim ;
Kones, Joan ;
Samuel, Edinah ;
Easthope-Frazer, Alicea ;
Charreyron, Eloise ;
Wang, Timothy ;
Feng, Andy ;
Mustafiz, Razin ;
Faria, Ismat Jabeen ;
Antwi-Agyei, Prince ;
Donkor, Emmanuel ;
Adjei, Kwaku ;
Monney, Isaac ;
Kisiangani, Joyce ;
MacLeod, Clara ;
Mwangi, Brian ;
Khush, Ranjiv .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (01) :767-777
[8]   Capital and Operating Costs of Full-Scale Fecal Sludge Management and Wastewater Treatment Systems in Dakar, Senegal [J].
Dodane, Pierre-Henri ;
Mbeguere, Mbaye ;
Sow, Ousmane ;
Strande, Linda .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (07) :3705-3711
[9]   Evaluating financial sustainability along the sanitation value chain using a financial flow simulator (eSOSView™) [J].
Furlong, Claire ;
Singh, Shirish ;
Shrestha, Nitesh ;
Sherpa, Mingma Gyalzen ;
Luthi, Christoph ;
Zakaria, Fiona ;
Brdjanovic, Damir .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 82 (11) :2220-2233
[10]  
Hutton G, 2016, The costs of meeting the 2030 sustainable development goal targets on drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene: summary report, DOI [10.1596/K8543, 10.1596/K8632, DOI 10.1596/K8632, 10.1596/k8543, DOI 10.1596/K8543]