Participation in Everyday Leisure and Its Influencing Factors for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Findings

被引:5
|
作者
Heister, Noemi [1 ]
Zentel, Peter [2 ]
Koeb, Stefanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Educ, Dept Educ Sci, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Educ & Rehabil, D-80539 Munich, Germany
来源
DISABILITIES | 2023年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
intellectual disabilities (ID); profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD); leisure; participation; scoping review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; MULTIPLE DISABILITIES; VIRTUAL-REALITY; YOUNG-ADULTS; CHILDREN; ADOLESCENTS; YOUTH; INDIVIDUALS; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.3390/disabilities3020018
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Participation is often defined as taking part and being included in different areas of life. Leisure represents an important area of life for all people. People with disabilities have the right to experience leisure time in a self-determined manner. They have the right to participate in leisure activities on an equal basis with others. Due to various influencing factors, people with intellectual disabilities, especially those with severe to profound intellectual disabilities, are at risk of decreased participation. This is alarming because participation in leisure activities reflects quality of life. Purpose: The present study aims to review the empirical findings on leisure participation and its influencing factors in people with mild to moderate disabilities as compared to people with severe to profound intellectual disabilities. Method: A scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR checklist by Cochrane and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) was conducted to examine research studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2022. The studies that were included relate to activities within the everyday leisure time of people with intellectual disabilities, regardless of age, gender, or severity of their cognitive disability. The categories of vacation and tourism were excluded so as to focus on everyday leisure. The sample was screened by two reviewers independently. In total, 27 articles met the inclusion criteria, with 21 articles referring to people with a mild to moderate intellectual disability and only six articles referring to people with a severe to profound intellectual disability. The evidence was summarized with a predefined standardized charting form, which was used by the two reviewers. Results: The results show that participation in leisure activities by people with intellectual disabilities can be limited, especially for those with severe to profound intellectual disabilities. This contradicts the guiding principle and human rights of inclusion and self-determination. Their participation in leisure time is extremely dependent on external factors, such as support people, leisure time availability, and form of living. Passive activities at home are often provided for people with severe to profound intellectual disabilities in particular; therefore, the need for interactive and self-determined leisure opportunities in the community is enormous. Various factors influencing leisure participation can be identified. Implications: The findings of this scoping review can be used to consider intervention, support, and barriers to enhancing leisure participation among people with disabilities as an important area of life.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 294
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PARTICIPATION IN EVERYDAY LEISURE AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE WITH PROFOUND AND MULTIPLE DISABILITIES
    Zentel, P.
    Heister, N.
    Koeb, S.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (07) : 859 - 859
  • [2] Community participation of people with an intellectual disability: a review of empirical findings
    Verdonschot, M. M. L.
    de Witte, L. P.
    Reichrath, E.
    Buntinx, W. H. E.
    Curfs, L. M. G.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2009, 53 : 303 - 318
  • [3] Everyday Technology to Support Leisure and Daily Activities in People with Intellectual and Other Disabilities
    Lancioni, Giulio E.
    Singh, Nirbhay N.
    O'Reilly, Mark F.
    Sigafoos, Jeff
    Alberti, Gloria
    Chiariello, Valeria
    Carrella, Luigina
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2020, 23 (07) : 431 - 438
  • [4] Health of people with intellectual disabilities: A review of factors influencing access to health care
    Ruddick, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 10 : 559 - 570
  • [5] Participation of adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A scoping review
    Hanzen, Gineke
    Waninge, Aly
    van der Putten, Annette
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1267 - 1267
  • [6] The political participation of people with intellectual disabilities: A mapping review
    Tipping, S.
    Bigby, C.
    Whiteside, M.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (7-8) : 750 - 750
  • [7] Violence Prevention Strategies for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review
    Araten-Bergman, Tal
    Bigby, Christine
    AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 76 (01) : 72 - 87
  • [8] Impact of infection outbreak on people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review
    Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
    Nijs, Sara L. P.
    van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2021, 46 (04): : 291 - 299
  • [9] Emergency Medical Care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review
    York, Jana
    Wechuli, Yvonne
    Karbach, Ute
    OPEN ACCESS EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 14 : 441 - 456
  • [10] Psychological eHealth interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review
    Oudshoorn, Cathelijn E. M.
    Frielink, Noud
    Nijs, Sara L. P.
    Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (04) : 950 - 972