Comparative analysis of machine learning models for shortlisting SNPs to facilitate detection of marginal epistasis in GWAS

被引:0
作者
Dasmandal, Tanwy [1 ,2 ]
Sinha, Dipro [4 ]
Rai, Anil [3 ]
Mishra, Dwijesh Chandra [4 ]
Archak, Sunil [5 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Grad Sch, New Delhi, India
[2] ICAR Natl Bur Fish Genet Resources, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Indian Council Agr Res, New Delhi, India
[4] ICAR Indian Agr Stat Res Inst, New Delhi, India
[5] ICAR Natl Bur Plant Genet Resources, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Marginal epistasis; Machine learning; GWAS; Feature selection; SNP-SNP interactions; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; GENETIC ARCHITECTURE; COMPLEX TRAITS; COMMON; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s41060-024-00647-1
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Epistasis, an essential genetic element causing phenotypic diversity, is frequently characterized as the interaction between two or more genes. Previous models could identify marginal epistatic interactions by mapping variants that have nonzero marginal epistatic effects. However, these models fail short of identifying individual interaction partners. To reduce the computational burden of the existing epistasis detection algorithms without compromising the detection of exact epistatic partners, strengths of various machine learning algorithms were exploited as a filtering strategy. Seven machine learning strategies were compared for shortlisting marginally associated SNPs that includes AdaBoost, artificial neural network, 3 random forest, stepwise regression, ridge regression, lasso and elastic net. Datasets were simulated for different combinations of heritability and minor allele frequencies, and performances of different algorithms were evaluated using power and precision measures. We found that ridge regression model outperformed the other models in shortlisting marginal epistasis-related SNPs. Thus, it is expected that epistasis detection tools will benefit by adding a filtering stage using ridge regression for efficient detection of marginal epistasis in large genomic datasets.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Nanofluids Viscosity Assessment
    Shateri, Mohammadhadi
    Sobhanigavgani, Zeinab
    Alinasab, Azin
    Varamesh, Amir
    Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein
    Mosavi, Amir
    Shahab, S.
    NANOMATERIALS, 2020, 10 (09) : 1 - 22
  • [22] Enhancement of Properties of Concrete by Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models
    Mohit
    Balwinder, L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRENDS IN ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION, ICTAC-2024, 2025, 527 : 1185 - 1193
  • [23] Enhancing cure rate analysis through integration of machine learning models: a comparative study
    Aselisewine, Wisdom
    Pal, Suvra
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2024, 34 (04)
  • [24] Stacked machine learning models for non-technical loss detection in smart grid: A comparative analysis
    Hashim, Muhammad
    Khan, Laiq
    Javaid, Nadeem
    Ullah, Zahid
    Javed, Aymin
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2024, 12 : 1235 - 1253
  • [25] A comparative analysis and classification of cancerous brain tumors detection based on classical machine learning and deep transfer learning models
    Singh, Yajuvendra Pratap
    Lobiyal, D. K.
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (13) : 39537 - 39562
  • [26] Advanced Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Transformer Models for Depression and Suicide Detection in Social Media Texts
    Bokolo, Biodoumoye George
    Liu, Qingzhong
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (20)
  • [27] A comparative analysis and classification of cancerous brain tumors detection based on classical machine learning and deep transfer learning models
    Yajuvendra Pratap Singh
    D.K Lobiyal
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83 : 39537 - 39562
  • [28] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps
    Abraham, Adriel
    Jose, Rejath
    Ahmad, Jawad
    Joshi, Jai
    Jacob, Thomas
    Khalid, Aziz-ur-rahman
    Ali, Hassam
    Patel, Pratik
    Singh, Jaspreet
    Toma, Milan
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2023, 9 (10)
  • [29] A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Classification and Detection of Malware
    Al-Janabi, Maryam
    Altamimi, Ahmad Mousa
    2020 21ST INTERNATIONAL ARAB CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ACIT), 2020,
  • [30] Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms in detection of phishing websites
    Kosan, Muhammed Ali
    Yildiz, Oktay
    Karacan, Hacer
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2018, 24 (02): : 276 - 282