Participatory Design Curriculum Promotes Engineering Design, Critical Thinking, and Creativity for Students From Kindergarten to 12th Grade

被引:0
作者
Chien, Yu-Hung [1 ]
Liu, Chia-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Technol Applicat & Human Resource Dev, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Acad Educ Res, Res Ctr Testing & Assessment, 2 Sanshu Rd, New Taipei 237201, Taiwan
关键词
creativity; critical thinking; curriculum; from kindergarten to 12th grade; participatory design; STEAM;
D O I
10.1037/aca0000652
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Critical thinking and creativity are the most valuable human resources for addressing today's and tomorrow's challenges. To foster the growth of these higher-order thinking skills, participatory design, which gives students the chance to work with users, should be included in engineering-design courses as a useful strategy. This study developed a participatory-design curriculum to improve students' engineering-design behaviors and foster critical-thinking skills and creativity. Our study included 111 10th-graders. We compared the differences between an experimental participatory-design group and a control engineering-design group (limited and unlimited) for engineering-design and critical-thinking behaviors using lag sequential analysis and creativity using a creative product analysis matrix. We show that the participatory-design group displayed more significant engineering-design and critical-thinking behaviors compared to the other groups, but the creativity results were mixed. We conclude with possible strategies to implement participatory design to enhance students' performance in engineering design, critical thinking, and creativity; offer insights for teaching; and strengthen the alignment of school curricula for upcoming higher-order thinking skill sets.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [41] The relationship of the quality of creative problem solving stages to overall creativity in engineering students
    Nazzal, Lamies J.
    Kaufman, James C.
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2020, 38
  • [42] Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students' creativity
    Ozkan, Gulbin
    Topsakal, Unsal Umdu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2021, 31 (01) : 95 - 116
  • [43] Perkins C, 2006, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V9, P298
  • [44] Peschl M. F., 2019, Design Management Journal, V14, P4, DOI [10.1111/dmj.12049, DOI 10.1111/DMJ.12049]
  • [45] Philley J., 2005, Professional Safety, V50, P26
  • [46] Creativity and Domain Specificity: The Effect of Task Type on Multiple Indexes of Creative Problem-Solving
    Reiter-Palmon, Roni
    Illies, Marcy Young
    Cross, Lisa Kobe
    Buboltz, CaraBeth
    Nimps, Tom
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2009, 3 (02) : 73 - 80
  • [47] Smart learning environments for a smart city: from the perspective of lifelong and lifewide learning
    Rongxia Zhuang
    Haiguang Fang
    Yan Zhang
    Aofan Lu
    Ronghuai Huang
    [J]. Smart Learning Environments, 4 (1)
  • [48] Sanders E.B.N., 2008, CoDesign, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/15710880701875068
  • [49] Analysis of Critical Thinking Path of College Students Under STEAM Course
    Sha, Jingrong
    Shu, Hong
    Kan, Zhaocao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [50] Teacher Suggestion Feedback Facilitates Creativity of Students in STEAM Education
    Shen, Sha
    Wang, Saidi
    Qi, Yun
    Wang, Yanli
    Yan, Xiangdong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12