Machine learning-assisted performance prediction from the synthesis conditions of nanofiltration membranes

被引:2
|
作者
Sutariya, Bhaumik [1 ,2 ]
Sarkar, Pulak [1 ,2 ]
Indurkar, Pankaj D. [1 ,2 ]
Karan, Santanu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CSIR, Membrane Sci & Separat Technol Div, Cent Salt & Marine Chem Res Inst, Gijubhai Badheka Marg, Bhavnagar 364002, Gujarat, India
[2] Acad Sci & Innovat Res AcSIR, Ghaziabad 201002, India
关键词
Thin-film composite membrane; Polyamide; Nanofiltration membrane; Permeance-selectivity tradeoff; Machine learning; NEURAL-NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2024.128960
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Optimizing membrane fabrication conditions, including monomer and catalyst concentrations, reaction time, etc., is crucial for achieving high-performance membranes. However, the multitude of variables involved can result in a complex and laborious permutation process, making trial-and-error optimization challenging. To address this issue, we developed a conventional multiple linear regression model and machine learning (ML) models, specifically random forest (RF) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP), to predict the performance of nanofiltration membranes in terms of key parameters such as pure water permeance or PWP (LMH/bar), Na2SO4 rejection (%), and NaCl rejection (%), based on specified input variable ranges. The input variables utilized to construct the models are the concentration of piperazine (PIP) (0.01-2 wt%), the concentration of trimesoyl chloride (TMC) (0.05-0.15 wt%), the concentration of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) (0-10 mM), and reaction time (5-1200 s). The conventional regression model failed to predict the membrane performance. The RF model exhibited the best prediction capability for PWP and NaCl rejection with the R2 of 0.9806 and 0.9812 for training, and 0.9669 and 0.9082 for testing, respectively. Similarly, the MLP model outperformed the RF model in predicting Na2SO4 rejection with an R2 of 0.9972 for testing and 0.9844 for training. The best membrane exhibited permeance ranging from 16 to 20 LMH/bar and selectivity between NaCl and Na2SO4 of over 4000, was facilitated by specific conditions. These conditions included lower concentrations of PIP (0.05-0.1 wt%), intermediate concentration of TMC (0.1 wt%), lower concentration of SLS (1 mM), and shorter reaction times (5-30 s). The best-performing ML-based models have been used to provide insights into the relative importance of these input variables in determining membrane performance, thereby aiding in correlating model predictions with fundamental principles of membrane fabrication processes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine Learning-Assisted Prediction of Stress Corrosion Crack Growth Rate in Stainless Steel
    Wang, Peng
    Wu, Huanchun
    Liu, Xiangbing
    Xu, Chaoliang
    CRYSTALS, 2024, 14 (10)
  • [32] Machine Learning-Assisted Prediction of Ambient-Processed Perovskite Solar Cells' Performances
    Pyun, Dowon
    Lee, Seungtae
    Lee, Solhee
    Jeong, Seok-Hyun
    Hwang, Jae-Keun
    Kim, Kyunghwan
    Kim, Youngmin
    Nam, Jiyeon
    Cho, Sujin
    Hwang, Ji-Seong
    Lee, Wonkyu
    Lee, Sangwon
    Lee, Hae-Seok
    Kim, Donghwan
    Kang, Yoonmook
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (23)
  • [33] Machine learning-assisted constitutive modeling of a novel powder metallurgy superalloy
    Wen, Hongning
    Jin, Junsong
    Tang, Xuefeng
    Wang, Xinyun
    Yang, Heyang
    Zhang, Yiding
    Zhang, Mao
    Deng, Lei
    Wei, Qingsong
    Chen, Junzhi
    Ma, Xiangdong
    Guo, Jianzheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 260
  • [34] Machine Learning-Assisted Simulations and Predictions for Battery Interfaces
    Sun, Zhaojun
    Li, Xin
    Wu, Yiming
    Gu, Qilin
    Zheng, Shiyou
    ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2025,
  • [35] Machine Learning-Assisted Modeling in Antenna Array Design
    Wu, Qi
    Chen, Weiqi
    Li, Yuefeng
    Wang, Haiming
    Yin, Jiexi
    Yin, Weishuang
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ANTENNA TECHNOLOGY, IWAT, 2024, : 92 - 93
  • [36] Machine Learning-Assisted PAPR Reduction in Massive MIMO
    Kalinov, Aleksei
    Bychkov, Roman
    Ivanov, Andrey
    Osinsky, Alexander
    Yarotsky, Dmitry
    IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS, 2021, 10 (03) : 537 - 541
  • [37] Machine learning-assisted global optimization of photonic devices
    Kudyshev, Zhaxylyk A.
    Kildishev, Alexander, V
    Shalaev, Vladimir M.
    Boltasseva, Alexandra
    NANOPHOTONICS, 2021, 10 (01) : 371 - 383
  • [38] Machine learning-assisted synthetic biology of cyanobacteria and microalgae
    Jin, Weijia
    Wang, Fangzhong
    Chen, Lei
    Zhang, Weiwen
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2025, 86
  • [39] Novel Cocrystals of Vonoprazan: Machine Learning-Assisted Discovery
    Lee, Min-Jeong
    Kim, Ji-Yoon
    Kim, Paul
    Lee, In-Seo
    Mswahili, Medard E.
    Jeong, Young-Seob
    Choi, Guang J.
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [40] Machine learning-assisted surrogate construction for full-core fuel performance analysis
    Che, Yifeng
    Yurko, Joseph
    Seurin, Paul
    Shirvan, Koroush
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2022, 168