Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Mechanical Behavior of Bio-Based Cellular Composite Sandwich Structures

被引:10
作者
Dashtgoli, Danial Sheini [1 ,2 ]
Taghizadeh, Seyedahmad [3 ]
Macconi, Lorenzo [3 ]
Concli, Franco [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trieste, Dept Math Informat & Geosci, I-34128 Trieste, Italy
[2] Natl Inst Oceanog & Appl Geophys OGS, I-34010 Sgonico, Italy
[3] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Engn, Piazza Univ 5, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
machine learning; generalized regression neural networks; extreme learning machine; support vector regression; biocomposites;
D O I
10.3390/ma17143493
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The growing demand for sustainable materials has significantly increased interest in biocomposites, which are made from renewable raw materials and have excellent mechanical properties. The use of machine learning (ML) can improve our understanding of their mechanical behavior while saving costs and time. In this study, the mechanical behavior of innovative biocomposite sandwich structures under quasi-static out-of-plane compression was investigated using ML algorithms to analyze the effects of geometric variations on load-bearing capacities. A comprehensive dataset of experimental mechanical tests focusing on compression loading was employed, evaluating three ML models-generalized regression neural networks (GRNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), and support vector regression (SVR). Performance indicators such as R-squared (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to compare the models. It was shown that the GRNN model with an RMSE of 0.0301, an MAE of 0.0177, and R2 of 0.9999 in the training dataset, and an RMSE of 0.0874, MAE of 0.0489, and R2 of 0.9993 in the testing set had a higher predictive accuracy. In contrast, the ELM model showed moderate performance, while the SVR model had the lowest accuracy with RMSE, MAE, and R2 values of 0.5769, 0.3782, and 0.9700 for training, and RMSE, MAE, and R2 values of 0.5980, 0.3976 and 0.9695 for testing, suggesting that it has limited effectiveness in predicting the mechanical behavior of the biocomposite structures. The nonlinear load-displacement behavior, including critical peaks and fluctuations, was effectively captured by the GRNN model for both the training and test datasets. The progressive improvement in model performance from SVR to ELM to GRNN was illustrated, highlighting the increasing complexity and capability of machine learning models in capturing detailed nonlinear relationships. The superior performance and generalization ability of the GRNN model were confirmed by the Taylor diagram and Williams plot, with the majority of testing samples falling within the applicability domain, indicating strong generalization to new, unseen data. The results demonstrate the potential of using advanced ML models to accurately predict the mechanical behavior of biocomposites, enabling more efficient and cost-effective development and optimization processes in the field of sustainable materials.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Rice Yield: Insights from Agricultural Inputs and Practices in Rwanda [J].
Mugemangango, Cyprien ;
Nzabanita, Joseph ;
Muhoza, Dieudonne Ndaruhuye ;
Cahill, Nathan D. .
RESEARCH ON WORLD AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY, 2024, 5 (04) :350-366
[32]   Predicting User Purchases From Clickstream Data: A Comparative Analysis of Clickstream Data Representations and Machine Learning Models [J].
Tokuc, A. Aylin ;
Dag, Tamer .
IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 :43796-43817
[33]   Predicting Waitlist Mortality for Liver Transplant Candidates: A Comparative Analysis between Statistical Scores and Machine Learning Models [J].
Halimi, Abdelghani ;
Houmani, Nesma ;
Garcia-Salicetti, Sonia ;
Kounis, Ilias ;
Coilly, Audrey .
2024 12TH E-HEALTH AND BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE, EHB 2024, 2024, :116-119
[34]   Comparative analysis of pedestrian volume models: Agent-based models, machine learning methods and multiple regression analysis [J].
Wolpert, Lior ;
Omer, Itzhak .
COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2025, 117
[35]   A survey for user behavior analysis based on machine learning techniques: current models and applications [J].
Alejandro G. Martín ;
Alberto Fernández-Isabel ;
Isaac Martín de Diego ;
Marta Beltrán .
Applied Intelligence, 2021, 51 :6029-6055
[36]   A survey for user behavior analysis based on machine learning techniques: current models and applications [J].
Martin, Alejandro G. ;
Fernandez-Isabel, Alberto ;
de Diego, Isaac Martin ;
Beltran, Marta .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 51 (08) :6029-6055
[37]   Life cycle assessment of bio-based and synthetic epoxy resin mediated composite tiles: a comparative analysis based on agricultural and industrial waste filler [J].
Faroque, Firoz Alam ;
Jayasundara, Piyumali Mewanthika ;
Rathnayake, Mahinsasa ;
Ghosh, Subrata Bandhu ;
Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh, Sanchita .
JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 27 (04) :2482-2498
[38]   Detecting Cutout Shape and Predicting Its Location in Sandwich Structures Using Free Vibration Analysis and Tuned Machine-Learning Algorithms [J].
Demircioglu, Ufuk ;
Sayil, Asaf ;
Bakir, Halit .
ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 49 (02) :1611-1624
[39]   Detecting Cutout Shape and Predicting Its Location in Sandwich Structures Using Free Vibration Analysis and Tuned Machine-Learning Algorithms [J].
Ufuk Demircioğlu ;
Asaf Sayil ;
Halit Bakır .
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024, 49 :1611-1624
[40]   Comparative analysis of machine learning models in predicting housing prices: a case study of Prishtina's real estate market [J].
Hoxha, Visar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOUSING MARKETS AND ANALYSIS, 2025, 18 (03) :694-711