Management of Advanced Staged Ovarian Cancer in a National Cancer Center: Comparison of the Efficacy of Primary Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

被引:0
作者
Kovacevic, Nina [1 ]
Skof, Erik [2 ]
Cilensek, Ines [3 ]
Merlo, Sebastjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol Ljubljana, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Zaloska Cesta 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Inst Oncol Ljubljana, Dept Med Oncol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Med Fac, Inst Histol & Embryol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Interval debulking surgery; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ovarian cancer; primary debulking surgery; overall survival; optimal cytoreduction; ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS; FALLOPIAN-TUBE; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; TRIALS;
D O I
10.2174/1573404817666210106093301
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In most cases, ovarian cancer is diagnosed at an advanced stage. The aim of this study was to determine if Primary Debulking Surgery (PDS) for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is an equivalent treatment approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 214 women with stage FIGO IIIC and IV ovarian cancer was performed at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia. Women were divided into two groups based on their primary treatment. The first group was the NACT group (184 women) and the second the PDS group (30 women). The selection of the women for PDS or NACT was based on the expertise of the gynecological-oncological surgeon and the image exam results. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for calculating Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS). The statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS. Results: The median OS was lower in the NACT group than in the PDS group, 25 months (95% CI 20.6-29.5) and 46 months (95% CI 32.9-62.1), respectively. The PFS in the NACT group was 8 months (95% CI 6.4-9.5) and 18 months (95% CI 12.5-23.4) in the PDS group. For women treated with PDS the 5-year survival rate was 36.7% and 20.1% in the NACT group. Conclusion: In this study, the best survival results were observed in women treated with PDS, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. If a woman is not suitable for surgery, NACT doubles the chance of a complete gross resection. Despite higher rates of complete gross resection after NACT, women treated with PDS (complete gross resection or optimal surgery) had higher OS.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 273
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality in primary cytoreductive surgery compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian malignancy [J].
Bartels, Helena C. ;
Rogers, Ailin C. ;
McSharry, Veronica ;
McVey, Ruaidhri ;
Walsh, Thomas ;
O'Brien, Donal ;
Boyd, William D. ;
Brennan, Donal J. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 (03) :622-630
[2]   Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: optimal patient selection and response evaluation [J].
Cho, Jae Hyun ;
Kim, Seik ;
Song, Yong Sang .
CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (06)
[3]   Role of Surgical Outcome as Prognostic Factor in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Combined Exploratory Analysis of 3 Prospectively Randomized Phase 3 Multicenter Trials By the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l'Ovaire (GINECO) [J].
du Bois, Andreas ;
Reuss, Alexander ;
Pujade-Lauraine, Eric ;
Harter, Philipp ;
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle ;
Pfisterer, Jacobus .
CANCER, 2009, 115 (06) :1234-1244
[4]   The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer [J].
Elies, Antoine ;
Riviere, Sophie ;
Pouget, Nicolas ;
Becette, Veronique ;
Dubot, Coraline ;
Donnadieu, Anne ;
Rouzier, Roman ;
Bonneau, Claire .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (06) :555-566
[5]   Introduction of staging laparoscopy in the management of advanced epithelial ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancer: Impact on prognosis in a single institution experience [J].
Fagotti, A. ;
Vizzielli, G. ;
Fanfani, F. ;
Costantini, B. ;
Ferrandina, G. ;
Gallotta, V. ;
Alletti, S. Gueli ;
Tortorella, L. ;
Scambia, G. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (02) :341-346
[6]   Principles of clinical management of ovarian cancer [J].
Gorodnova, Tatiana V. ;
Sokolenko, Anna P. ;
Kuligina, Ekatherina ;
Berlev, Igor V. ;
Imyanitov, Evgeny N. .
CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (06)
[7]   Prediction of post-operative residual disease in advanced-stage ovarian cancer (AOC) using whole transcriptome expression: An exploratory analysis of the AGO-OVAR 11 (ICON7) trial. [J].
Heitz, Florian ;
Kommoss, Stefan ;
Winterhoff, Boris J. N. ;
Aliferis, Constantin ;
Burges, Alexander ;
Wang, Chen ;
Canzler, Ulrich ;
Wang, Jinhua ;
Belau, Antje Kristina ;
Hanker, Lars Christian ;
Ma, Sisi ;
Hilpert, Felix ;
Sehouli, Jalid ;
Tourani, Roshan ;
Kimmig, Rainer ;
Kurzeder, Christian ;
Schmalfeldt, Barbara ;
Dowdy, Sean Christopher ;
Du Bois, Andreas ;
Pfisterer, Jacobus .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
[8]   Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial [J].
Kehoe, Sean ;
Hook, Jane ;
Nankivell, Matthew ;
Jayson, Gordon C. ;
Kitchener, Henry ;
Lopes, Tito ;
Luesley, David ;
Perren, Timothy ;
Bannoo, Selina ;
Mascarenhas, Monica ;
Dobbs, Stephen ;
Essapen, Sharadah ;
Twigg, Jeremy ;
Herod, Jonathan ;
McCluggage, Glenn ;
Parmar, Mahesh ;
Swart, Ann-Marie .
LANCET, 2015, 386 (9990) :249-257
[9]   Factors Predicting Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Primary Debulking Surgery in Advanced Stage Ovarian CancerA National Cancer Database Study [J].
Leiserowitz, Gary S. ;
Lin, Jeff F. ;
Tergas, Ana I. ;
Cliby, William A. ;
Bristow, Robert E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (04) :675-683
[10]   Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Primary or Interval Debulking? Five Categories of Patients in View of the Results of Randomized Trials and Tumor Biology: Primary Debulking Surgery and Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer [J].
Makar, Amin P. ;
Trope, Claes G. ;
Tummers, Philippe ;
Denys, Hannelore ;
Vandecasteele, Katrien .
ONCOLOGIST, 2016, 21 (06) :745-754