Endovascular Versus Open Repair in Adolescent Patients With Difficult-to-Access Vascular Injuries

被引:0
|
作者
Otaibi, Banan W. [1 ]
Bhogadi, Sai Krishna [1 ]
Khurshid, Muhammad Haris [1 ]
Stewart, Collin [1 ]
Hosseinpour, Hamidreza [1 ]
Spencer, Audrey L. [1 ]
Hejazi, Omar [1 ]
Nelson, Adam [1 ]
Magnotti, Louis J. [1 ]
Joseph, Bellal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care Burns & Emergency Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Endovascular repair; Iliac artery injury; Open repair; Subclavian artery injury; ARTERIAL INJURY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.068
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Management of subclavian artery injuries (SAI) and iliac artery injuries (IAI) in adolescent trauma patients poses a considerable challenge due to their complex anatomical locations. The aim of our study was to determine the association between the injury mechanism and type of repair with the outcomes of patients with traumatic SAI and IAI. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database2017-2020, adolescent (<18 y) patients with SAI and IAI undergoing either endovascular or open repair were included. Patients were stratified by mechanism (blunt versus penetrating) and type of repair (endovascular [E] versus open [O]) and compared. Outcomes measured were mortality and major complications. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Over 4 y, 170 pediatric patients were identified, of which 73 (43%) sustained an SAI and 97 (57%) had IAI. The mean age was 15 and 79% were male. Overall, 39% were managed endovascularly. Both groups had comparable median injury severity score (E: 23 versus O: 25, P = 0.278). For patients with blunt injury (n = 60), the type of repair was neither associated with major complications (E: 39% versus O: 33%, P = 0.694) nor mortality (E: 2.6% versus O: 4.8%, P = 0.651). For patients with penetrating injuries (n = 110), the endovascular repair had significantly lower morbidity (19% versus 41%, P = 0.034) and mortality (3.7% versus 21%, P = 0.041). On multivariable logistic regression, endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable risk factor associated with reduced mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.201, 95% confidence interval [0.14-0.76], P = 0.038). Conclusions: Difficult-to-access vascular injuries result in significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair was found to be the only modifiable factor associated with decreased mortality of patients with penetrating injury, whereas the type of repair was not associated with mortality in those with blunt injury.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 392
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endovascular Salvage of Complications Following Initial Open Repair of Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injuries
    Park, Diane
    Rajakumar, Chandheeb
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 45 (02) : 183 - 186
  • [42] Endovascular Repair versus Open Repair for Isolated Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
    Lee, Hyung Chae
    Joo, Hyun-Chel
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Lee, Sak
    Chang, Byung-Chul
    Yoo, Kyung-Jong
    Youn, Young-Nam
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 904 - 912
  • [43] Endovascular versus open repair of asymptomatic popliteal artery aneurysm
    Joshi, Dhiraj
    James, Richard L.
    Jones, Lyn
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (08):
  • [44] Open Versus Endovascular or Hybrid Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Ryan Clare
    Julianne Jorgensen
    Somjot S. Brar
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2016, 18
  • [45] Open versus Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Speicher, Paul J.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Mureebe, Leila
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (05) : 1249 - 1257
  • [46] Open Versus Endovascular or Hybrid Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Clare, Ryan
    Jorgensen, Julianne
    Brar, Somjot S.
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2016, 18 (10)
  • [47] A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair for the traumatic ruptured thoracic aorta
    Harky, Amer
    Bleetman, David
    Chan, Jeffrey S. K.
    Eriksen, Peter
    Chaplin, Grace
    MacCarthy-Ofosu, Beverly
    Theologou, Thomas
    Ambekar, Shirish
    Roberts, Neil
    Oo, Aung
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 71 (01) : 270 - 282
  • [48] Surgical or endovascular repair of thrombosed dialysis vascular access: Is there any evidence?
    Tordoir, Jan H. M.
    Bode, Aron S.
    Peppelenbosch, Noud
    van der Sande, Frank M.
    de Haan, Michiel W.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (04) : 953 - 956
  • [49] Endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    McHugh, S. M.
    Aherne, T.
    Goetz, T.
    Byrne, J.
    Boyle, E.
    Allen, M.
    Leahy, A.
    Moneley, D.
    Naughton, P.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2016, 14 (05): : 274 - 277
  • [50] Safety and Efficiency of Endovascular Treatment of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Asghar, Umair
    Qadir, Abdul
    Hanif, Ayesha
    Waheed, Iqra
    Malik, Zeeshan
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 10 (04): : 1143 - 1146