Endovascular Versus Open Repair in Adolescent Patients With Difficult-to-Access Vascular Injuries

被引:0
|
作者
Otaibi, Banan W. [1 ]
Bhogadi, Sai Krishna [1 ]
Khurshid, Muhammad Haris [1 ]
Stewart, Collin [1 ]
Hosseinpour, Hamidreza [1 ]
Spencer, Audrey L. [1 ]
Hejazi, Omar [1 ]
Nelson, Adam [1 ]
Magnotti, Louis J. [1 ]
Joseph, Bellal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care Burns & Emergency Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Endovascular repair; Iliac artery injury; Open repair; Subclavian artery injury; ARTERIAL INJURY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.068
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Management of subclavian artery injuries (SAI) and iliac artery injuries (IAI) in adolescent trauma patients poses a considerable challenge due to their complex anatomical locations. The aim of our study was to determine the association between the injury mechanism and type of repair with the outcomes of patients with traumatic SAI and IAI. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database2017-2020, adolescent (<18 y) patients with SAI and IAI undergoing either endovascular or open repair were included. Patients were stratified by mechanism (blunt versus penetrating) and type of repair (endovascular [E] versus open [O]) and compared. Outcomes measured were mortality and major complications. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Over 4 y, 170 pediatric patients were identified, of which 73 (43%) sustained an SAI and 97 (57%) had IAI. The mean age was 15 and 79% were male. Overall, 39% were managed endovascularly. Both groups had comparable median injury severity score (E: 23 versus O: 25, P = 0.278). For patients with blunt injury (n = 60), the type of repair was neither associated with major complications (E: 39% versus O: 33%, P = 0.694) nor mortality (E: 2.6% versus O: 4.8%, P = 0.651). For patients with penetrating injuries (n = 110), the endovascular repair had significantly lower morbidity (19% versus 41%, P = 0.034) and mortality (3.7% versus 21%, P = 0.041). On multivariable logistic regression, endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable risk factor associated with reduced mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.201, 95% confidence interval [0.14-0.76], P = 0.038). Conclusions: Difficult-to-access vascular injuries result in significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair was found to be the only modifiable factor associated with decreased mortality of patients with penetrating injury, whereas the type of repair was not associated with mortality in those with blunt injury.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 392
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open versus endovascular repair for patients with acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta
    Canaud, Ludovic
    Alric, Pierre
    Branchereau, Pascal
    Joyeux, Frederic
    Hireche, Kheira
    Berthet, Jean-Philippe
    Marty-Ane, Charles
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 142 (05) : 1032 - 1037
  • [22] Open versus endovascular aneurysm repair trial review
    Weinkauf, Craig
    George, Elizabeth
    Zhou, Wei
    SURGERY, 2017, 162 (05) : 974 - 978
  • [23] Open versus endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms
    Moore, Randy D.
    Hill, Andrew B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (01) : 271 - 276
  • [24] Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Greenhalgh, Roger M.
    Brown, Louise C.
    Powell, Janet T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Epstein, David
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (20) : 1863 - 1871
  • [25] Mid-term results of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients anatomically suitable for endovascular repair
    Becquemin, JP
    Bourriez, A
    D'Audiffret, A
    Zubilewicz, T
    Kobeiter, H
    Allaire, E
    Mellière, D
    Desgranges, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 19 (06) : 656 - 661
  • [26] Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms
    Rao, Rohini
    Lane, Tristan R. A.
    Franklin, Ian J.
    Davies, Alun H.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 61 (01) : 242 - U591
  • [27] Mesenteric vascular treatment 2016: from open surgical repair to endovascular revascularization
    Blauw, Juliette T. M.
    Bulut, Tomas
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    Geelkerken, Bob R. H.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [28] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Versus Open Repair: Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank
    Elkbuli, Adel
    Dowd, Brianna
    Spano, Paul J., II
    Smith, Zachary
    Flores, Rudy
    McKenney, Mark
    Boneva, Dessy
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 245 : 179 - 182
  • [29] Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Ren, Shiyan
    Fan, Xueqiang
    Ye, Zhidong
    Liu, Peng
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 18 (03) : 222 - 227
  • [30] Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Lederle, Frank A.
    Kyriakides, Tassos C.
    Stroupe, Kevin T.
    Freischlag, Julie A.
    Padberg, Frank T., Jr.
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Huo, Zhiping
    Johnson, Gary R.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (22) : 2126 - 2135