Endovascular Versus Open Repair in Adolescent Patients With Difficult-to-Access Vascular Injuries

被引:0
|
作者
Otaibi, Banan W. [1 ]
Bhogadi, Sai Krishna [1 ]
Khurshid, Muhammad Haris [1 ]
Stewart, Collin [1 ]
Hosseinpour, Hamidreza [1 ]
Spencer, Audrey L. [1 ]
Hejazi, Omar [1 ]
Nelson, Adam [1 ]
Magnotti, Louis J. [1 ]
Joseph, Bellal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care Burns & Emergency Surg, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Endovascular repair; Iliac artery injury; Open repair; Subclavian artery injury; ARTERIAL INJURY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.068
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Management of subclavian artery injuries (SAI) and iliac artery injuries (IAI) in adolescent trauma patients poses a considerable challenge due to their complex anatomical locations. The aim of our study was to determine the association between the injury mechanism and type of repair with the outcomes of patients with traumatic SAI and IAI. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database2017-2020, adolescent (<18 y) patients with SAI and IAI undergoing either endovascular or open repair were included. Patients were stratified by mechanism (blunt versus penetrating) and type of repair (endovascular [E] versus open [O]) and compared. Outcomes measured were mortality and major complications. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Over 4 y, 170 pediatric patients were identified, of which 73 (43%) sustained an SAI and 97 (57%) had IAI. The mean age was 15 and 79% were male. Overall, 39% were managed endovascularly. Both groups had comparable median injury severity score (E: 23 versus O: 25, P = 0.278). For patients with blunt injury (n = 60), the type of repair was neither associated with major complications (E: 39% versus O: 33%, P = 0.694) nor mortality (E: 2.6% versus O: 4.8%, P = 0.651). For patients with penetrating injuries (n = 110), the endovascular repair had significantly lower morbidity (19% versus 41%, P = 0.034) and mortality (3.7% versus 21%, P = 0.041). On multivariable logistic regression, endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable risk factor associated with reduced mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.201, 95% confidence interval [0.14-0.76], P = 0.038). Conclusions: Difficult-to-access vascular injuries result in significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair was found to be the only modifiable factor associated with decreased mortality of patients with penetrating injury, whereas the type of repair was not associated with mortality in those with blunt injury.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 392
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Open versus endovascular repair of penetrating non-aortic arterial injuries: A systematic review and meta analysis
    Al Tannir, Abdul Hafiz
    Biesboer, Elise A.
    Pokrzywa, Courtney
    Golestani, Simin
    Kukushliev, Vasil
    Jean, Xavier
    Harding, Eric
    de Moya, Marc A.
    Morris, Rachel
    Kugler, Nathan
    Schellenberg, Morgan
    Murphy, Patrick B.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55 (03):
  • [2] Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Isolated Iliac Artery Aneurysms
    Zhorzel, Sven
    Busch, Albert
    Trenner, Matthias
    Reutersberg, Benedikt
    Salvermoser, Michael
    Eckstein, Hans-Henning
    Zimmermann, Alexander
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 53 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [3] Endovascular versus open repair of isolated superficial femoral and popliteal artery injuries
    Potter, Helen A.
    Alfson, Daniel B.
    Rowe, Vincent L.
    Wade, Niquelle B.
    Weaver, Fred A.
    Inaba, Kenji
    O'Banion, Leigh Ann
    Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
    Magee, Gregory A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (03) : 814 - +
  • [4] Penetrating Extremity Trauma Endovascular versus Open Repair?
    Kuwahara, Jeffery T.
    Kord, Ali
    Ray, Charles E., Jr.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 37 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [5] Endoscopic endonasal repair of difficult-to-access cerebrospinal fluid leaks of the frontal sinus
    Becker, Samuel S.
    Duncavage, James A.
    Russell, Paul T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2009, 23 (02) : 181 - 184
  • [6] Management of blunt thoracic aortic injuries: Endovascular stents versus open repair
    Ott, MC
    Stewart, TC
    Lawlor, DK
    Gray, DK
    Forbes, TL
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 56 (03): : 565 - 570
  • [7] Endovascular repair versus open surgery in patients in the treatment of the ruptured of aneurysms abdominal
    Novo Martinez, Gloria Maria
    Ballesteros Pomar, Marta
    Menendez Sanchez, Elena
    Santos Alcantara, Eliezer
    Rodriguez Fernandez, Ines
    Zorita Calvo, Andres Manuel
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2017, 95 (01): : 38 - 43
  • [8] Endovascular Instead of Open Surgical Repair of Axillosubclavian Artery Injuries: An Evolving Paradigm Shift
    Jalali, Shreya
    Roberts, Derek J.
    Brenner, Megan L.
    DuBose, Joseph J.
    Moore, Laura J.
    Power, Adam H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR RESUSCITATION AND TRAUMA MANAGEMENT, 2021, 5 (03): : 135 - 142
  • [9] Immediate Versus Delayed Repair of Destructive Bowel Injuries in Patients with an Open Abdomen
    Raines, Alexander
    Garwe, Tabitha
    Albrecht, Roxie
    Havron, William
    Hoge, Stephen
    Ademola, Adeseye
    Glenn, Jacquelyn
    Motghare, Prasenjeet
    Irvan, Jeremy
    Patel, Arpit
    Lees, Jason
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2015, 81 (05) : 458 - 462
  • [10] Open vs endovascular repair of blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injuries
    Rheaume, Pascal
    Chen, Jerry
    Casey, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (03) : 763 - 769