Clinical Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

被引:1
作者
Seto, Ichiro [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Hisashi [1 ]
Takagawa, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Azami, Yusuke [1 ]
Takayama, Kanako [1 ]
Suzuki, Motohisa [1 ]
Machida, Masanori [1 ]
Dai, Yuntao [1 ]
Sulaiman, Nor Shazrina Binti [1 ]
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Kato, Takahiro [2 ]
Nishino, Noriyuki [3 ]
Teranishi, Yasushi [4 ]
Murakami, Masao [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Tohoku Gen Hosp, Southern Tohoku Res Inst Neurosci, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol Southern, Koriyama, Japan
[2] Southern Tohoku Gen Hosp, Southern Tohoku Res Inst Neurosci, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys & Technol, Koriyama, Japan
[3] Southern Tohoku Gen Hosp, Southern Tohoku Res Inst Neurosci, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Koriyama, Japan
[4] Southern Tohoku Gen Hosp, Southern Tohoku Res Inst Neurosci, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Surg, Koriyama, Japan
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; PHASE-II TRIAL; CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PERFORMANCE STATUS; RADIATION-THERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; GEMCITABINE; RADIOTHERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2024.101577
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We retrospectively researched the treatment outcome of proton beam therapy (PBT) and assessed its efficacy fi cacy for inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at our institution. Methods and Materials: Fifty-four patients (28 men and 26 women, median age 67 years ranging from 40-88 years) were diagnosed with unresectable stage III LAPC and administered PBT from April 2009 to March 2020. Patients who could not complete PBT, had new distant metastases during the treatment, or did not have enough follow-up time were excluded from this study. All patients were clinically staged based on the International Union of Cancer TNM staging system (eighth edition) using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography and were diagnosed as stage III (histologic type: 18 patients with adenocarcinoma and 36 clinically diagnosed patients). PBT was performed using the passive method, with a median total dose of 67.5 GyE (range, 50-77 GyE/25-35 fractions). Chemotherapy was used in combination during PBT in 46 patients (85.2%). Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival, and median OS time were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following factors: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (PS), tumor site, total irradiation dose, concurrent chemotherapy, and primary tumor site. Cutoff values for SUVmax and tumor diameter were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve based on OS. Multivariate analysis was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models. Adverse events were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Results: The median observation period was 17.4 months, ranging from 4.0 to 89.7 months. The median tumor diameter was 36.5 mm, ranging from 15 to 90 mm, the median SUVmax was 5.85 (range, 2.1-27.6), and their cutoff values were estimated to be 37 mm and 4.8 mm, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS was 77.8% and 35.2%, respectively, with a median OS time of 18.2 months, and only one patient survived > 5 years. Twelve patients (22.2%) developed local recurrence, and 1- and 2-year LPFS rates were 89.7% and 74.5%, respectively; progression-free survival at 1 year was 58.8%. The PS score, tumor site, and irradiation dose were the prognostic factors related to OS that showed a significant fi cant difference. On the other hand, there was a significant fi cant difference in factors involved in LPFS, at 96.7%/77.9% in the fi rst year and 86.6%/54.4% in the second year in the groups with tumor dose >= 67.5 GyE and < 67.5 GyE, respectively (P = .015). Treatment-related acute toxicities were neutropenia (grade 1/2/3 at 3.7%/11.1%/31.5%, respectively), leukopenia (grade 1/2/3 at 1.8%/7.4%/20.4%, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (grade 1/2 at 1.8%/7.4%, respectively), whereas the late effects including peptic ulcer were captured only grade 2+. The late adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed. Conclusions: PBT achieving 67.5 Gy combined with standard chemotherapy showed excellent local control for unresectable LAPC. Total irradiation dose, tumor site, and PS score at an initial diagnosis could be important prognostic factors. In this study, the dose-effect relationship was found, so an increase in dose should be considered to improve prognosis. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Survival benefit of conversion surgery for patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer who responded favorably to nonsurgical treatment [J].
Asano, Toshimichi ;
Hirano, Satoshi ;
Nakamura, Toru ;
Okamura, Keisuke ;
Tsuchikawa, Takahiro ;
Noji, Takehiro ;
Nakanishi, Yoshitsugu ;
Tanaka, Kimitaka ;
Shichinohe, Toshiaki .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2018, 25 (07) :342-350
[2]   The clinical usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis, staging, and response evaluation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer [J].
Bang, Seungmin ;
Chung, Hye Won ;
Park, Seung Woo ;
Chung, Jae Bock ;
Yun, Mijin ;
Lee, Jong Doo ;
Song, Si Young .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 40 (10) :923-929
[3]   Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy with and without neoadjuvant gemcitabine for locally advanced unresectable or resected pancreatic cancer: A Phase I-II study [J].
Brade, Anthony ;
Brierley, James ;
Oza, Amit ;
Gallinger, Steven ;
Cummings, Bernard ;
MacLean, Martha ;
Pond, Gregory R. ;
Hedley, David ;
Wong, Shun ;
Townsley, Carol ;
Brezden-Masley, Christine ;
Moore, Malcolm .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (04) :1027-1036
[4]   Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Patients Aged 75 years and Older With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated With 5-Fraction Ablative Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (A-SMART) [J].
Bryant, J. M. ;
Palm, Russell F. ;
Herrera, Roberto ;
Rubens, Muni ;
Hoffe, Sarah E. ;
Kim, Dae Won ;
Kaiser, Adeel ;
Ucar, Antonio ;
Fleming, Jason ;
De Zarraga, Fernando ;
Hodul, Pamela ;
Aparo, Santiago ;
Asbun, Horacio ;
Malafa, Mokenge ;
Jimenez, Ramon ;
Denbo, Jason ;
Frakes, Jessica M. ;
Chuong, Michael D. .
CANCER CONTROL, 2023, 30
[5]   Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial [J].
Burris, HA ;
Moore, MJ ;
Andersen, J ;
Green, MR ;
Rothenberg, ML ;
Madiano, MR ;
Cripps, MC ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Storniolo, AM ;
Tarassoff, P ;
Nelson, R ;
Dorr, FA ;
Stephens, CD ;
VanHoff, DD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) :2403-2413
[6]   Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?: A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry [J].
Carpelan-Holmström, M ;
Nordling, S ;
Pukkala, E ;
Sankila, R ;
Lüttges, J ;
Klöppel, G ;
Haglund, C .
GUT, 2005, 54 (03) :385-387
[7]   Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.: Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study [J].
Chauffert, B. ;
Mornex, F. ;
Bonnetain, F. ;
Rougier, P. ;
Mariette, C. ;
Bouche, O. ;
Bosset, J. F. ;
Aparicio, T. ;
Mineur, L. ;
Azzedine, A. ;
Hammel, P. ;
Butel, J. ;
Stremsdoerfer, N. ;
Maingon, P. ;
Bedenne, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (09) :1592-1599
[8]   Phase II Trial of Cetuximab, Gemcitabine, and Oxaliplatin Followed by Chemoradiation With Cetuximab for Locally Advanced (T4) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation of Smad4(Dpc4) Immunostaining With Pattern of Disease Progression [J].
Crane, Christopher H. ;
Varadhachary, Gauri R. ;
Yordy, John S. ;
Staerkel, Gregg A. ;
Javle, Milind M. ;
Safran, Howard ;
Haque, Waqar ;
Hobbs, Bridgett D. ;
Krishnan, Sunil ;
Fleming, Jason B. ;
Das, Prajnan ;
Lee, Jeffrey E. ;
Abbruzzese, James L. ;
Wolff, Robert A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (22) :3037-3043
[9]   Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry; 30th Year Anniversary Japan Pancreas Society [J].
Egawa, Shinichi ;
Toma, Hiroki ;
Ohigashi, Hiroaki ;
Okusaka, Takuji ;
Nakao, Akimasa ;
Hatori, Takashi ;
Maguchi, Hiroyuki ;
Yanagisawa, Akio ;
Tanaka, Masao .
PANCREAS, 2012, 41 (07) :985-992
[10]   Performance Status is an Important Prognostic Factor in Second Line Treatment of Pancreaticobiliary Adenocarcinoma [J].
Erdogan, Bulent ;
Turkmen, Esma ;
Uzunoglu, Sernaz ;
Tanriverdi, Ozgur ;
Cicin, Irfan .
HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (126) :1479-1483