Patient Preferences for First-Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: An Application of Multidimensional Thresholding

被引:3
作者
Apolo, Andrea B. [1 ]
Michaels-Igbokwe, Christine [2 ]
Simon, Nicholas I. [1 ]
Benjamin, David J. [3 ]
Farrar, Mallory [4 ]
Hepp, Zsolt [4 ]
Mucha, Lisa [5 ]
Heidenreich, Sebastian [6 ]
Cutts, Katelyn [2 ]
Krucien, Nicolas [6 ]
Ramachandran, Natasha [6 ]
Gore, John L. [7 ]
机构
[1] NCI, NIH, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Evidera, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Hoag Family Canc Inst, Newport Beach, CA USA
[4] Pfizer Inc, Bothell, WA USA
[5] Astellas Pharma Inc, Northbrook, IL USA
[6] Evidera, London, England
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
PHASE-III TRIAL; BLADDER-CANCER; ENFORTUMAB VEDOTIN; DECISION-MAKING; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; PEMBROLIZUMAB; METHOTREXATE; GEMCITABINE; VINBLASTINE;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-024-00709-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesPatient preferences have the potential to influence the development of new treatments for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), and therefore we explored how patients with la/mUC value different attributes of first-line treatments.MethodsAn online preference survey and multidimensional thresholding (MDT) exercise were developed following a targeted literature review and qualitative interviews with physicians, patients with la/mUC, and their caregivers. Treatment attributes included two benefits (overall response rate [ORR], pain related to bladder cancer [scored 0-100; 100 being the worst pain possible]) and four treatment-related risks (peripheral neuropathy, severe side effects, mild to moderate nausea, mild to moderate skin reactions). A Dirichlet regression was used to estimate average preference weights. Marginal utility and the reduction in ORR that patients would accept in exchange for a 10-point decrease or a 10% decrease in other attributes were calculated.ResultsA total of 100 patients were recruited and self-completed the survey and MDT. Mean patient age was 64.9 years (standard deviation, 7.6), 54% were female, and 38% identified as white. All included treatment attributes had a statistically significant impact on preferences. Changes in ORR had the largest impact, followed by cancer-related pain and treatment-related risks. Patients were willing to accept an 8.4% decrease in ORR to reduce their pain level by 10 points or a 7.8% decrease in ORR to reduce the risk of peripheral neuropathy by 10%. For a 10% decrease in severe side effects, mild to moderate nausea, or skin reaction, patients would accept decreases in ORR of 5.5%, 3.7%, or 3.4%, respectively.ConclusionsOf the attributes tested, changes in ORR were most important to patients. Patients made tradeoffs between treatment attributes indicating that a lower ORR may be acceptable for an improvement in other attributes such as reduced cancer-related pain or the risk of treatment-related adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 87
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Apolo AB, 2023, J CLIN ONCOL, V41
[2]  
Apolo AB, 2020, J CLIN ONCOL, V38
[3]  
Apolo AB, 2020, J CLIN ONCOL, V38
[4]   Patient preferences in the treatment of genitourinary cancers [J].
Benjamin, David J. J. ;
Kalebasty, Arash Rezazadeh .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2023, 20 (09) :513-514
[5]   Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) of First-Line Therapies (1L) for Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (la/mUC) [J].
Bloudek, Lisa ;
Wright, Phoebe ;
McKay, Caroline ;
Derleth, Christina Louise ;
Lill, Jennifer Susan ;
Lenero, Enrique ;
Hepp, Zsolt ;
Ramsey, Scott David ;
Sullivan, Sean D. ;
Devine, Beth .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04) :3637-3647
[6]  
Boveldt NT, 2013, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V16, P379
[7]   A Roadmap for Increasing the Usefulness and Impact of Patient-Preference Studies in Decision Making in Health: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. ;
Hauber, Brett ;
Heidenreich, Sebastian ;
Janssen, Ellen ;
Bast, Alice ;
Hanmer, Janel ;
Danyliv, Andriy ;
Low, Eric ;
Bouvy, Jacoline C. ;
Marshall, Deborah A. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (02) :153-162
[8]   Quality of Life After Bladder Cancer: A Cross-sectional Survey of Patient-reported Outcomes [J].
Catto, James W. F. ;
Downing, Amy ;
Mason, Samantha ;
Wright, Penny ;
Absolom, Kate ;
Bottomley, Sarah ;
Hounsome, Luke ;
Hussain, Syed ;
Varughese, Mohini ;
Raw, Caroline ;
Kelly, Phil ;
Glaser, Adam W. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (05) :621-632
[9]   Current Treatment and Outcomes Benchmark for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer From a Large UK-Based Single Centre [J].
Cheeseman, Sue ;
Thompson, Matthew ;
Sopwith, Will ;
Godden, Paul ;
Seshagiri, Divyagiri ;
Adedokun, Lola ;
Zucker, Kieran ;
Jain, Sunjay ;
Kotwal, Sanjeev ;
Prescott, Stephen ;
Henry, Ann ;
Joseph, Joji ;
Chilka, Sameer ;
Roulson, Jo-An ;
Weston, Michael ;
Burbidge, Simon ;
Brown, Simon ;
Jagdev, Satinder ;
Ralph, Christy ;
Hall, Geoff ;
Vasudev, Naveen S. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
[10]  
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2023, ENFORTUMAB VEDOTIN P